Everybody's favorite dissembler is baaaack....
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/317/living/Bellesiles_responds_to_critics_of_his_book+.shtml
Bellesiles responds to critics of his book
By David Mehegan, Globe Staff, 11/13/2001
An Emory University historian, author of an award-winning and controversial book, has published a response to critics who say that he stretched the historical record to prove his thesis that gun ownership was not as common in Colonial days as is generally believed.
But Michael A. Bellesiles's formal reply to his critics, published in the November newsletter of the respected Organization of American Historians, is unlikely to pacify either his ideological foes or those academic critics who think his scholarship flawed.
That's because Bellesiles addresses only a few alleged errors - including those underscored by a Boston Globe examination of the case in September. And he deflects concerns about data he says he gathered in San Francisco - data other researchers say were destroyed nearly a century ago - by saying he doesn't recall where he did the research.
Bellesiles's 2000 book, ''Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture,'' was favorably reviewed and won the Bancroft Prize, given by Columbia University for a work of history. But its revisionist thesis that few Americans before the Civil War owned guns, and that half or more of guns in private hands were old or unserviceable, immediately came under attack from the National Rifle Association and other gun organizations.
Gradually, the gun owners were joined by academic critics who complained that the book is riddled with statistical errors and shoddy analysis. A few alleged that Bellesiles had actually fabricated some of his data.
Much of Bellesiles's article in the OAH Newsletter (www.oah
.org/pubs/nl) deplores the personal and partisan tone of his opponents, and the ''hateful, threatening, and expletive-laced'' calls and e-mails he has received. He says he believes ''dedicated individuals'' had hacked into his Web site, ''altering and deleting material.'' He also describes the flood at Emory that, he says, destroyed all his notes on probate inventories.
The most serious questions, principally raised by law professor James A. Lindgren of Northwestern University, focus on Bellesiles's use of those inventories - lists of personal possessions in probated wills in the Colonial period and in the 19th century. In an academic paper, Lindgren alleged that Bellesiles could not have done research on San Francisco probates, as he says he did in his book and on his Web site, because all such records were destroyed in the 1906 earthquake and fire. Lindgren also alleged that Bellesiles miscounted and distorted inventories in Colonial Rhode Island and Vermont.