User Panel
Posted: 11/2/2001 9:46:34 AM EDT
Is McUzi in the penalty box again, or what?
|
|
He got his sorry ass banned for saying he'd like to hunt down all LEO's and put a bullet in their heads. Very classy post. Must have been off his meds that day.
|
|
After that, he came back and was cussing out a staff member; then he went off to make trouble in the chat room.
He can be a really nice guy - and also quite the opposite. Maybe a bipolar disorder [;)] |
|
Quoted: He got his sorry ass banned for saying he'd like to hunt down all LEO's and put a bullet in their heads. Very classy post. Must have been off his meds that day. View Quote I don't believe you. That is totally our of character for McTroublemaker. [:D] |
|
Quoted: He can be a really nice guy - and also quite the opposite. Maybe a bipolar disorder [;)] View Quote I have made that assumption myself. |
|
Even with his inability to hold his tongue I think this place isn't nearly as fun without him. I just learned to take what he said with a grain of salt. And, for the most part, I agreed with the post that got him banned. Anyone enforcing tyranical laws is a tyrant, no matter what badge or uniform they wear. However, I don't believe in what he said about going out and hunting down LEO's because they are inherently evil. To do so would be an evil act in itself, because all LEO's are not evil. Most of the ones I have met have been good people.
God Bless Texas |
|
I also agree with what I_Luv_Carrots said in the post about the LEO's but again not about going out and hunting them down.
Besides if it did come down to an ignorant LEO taking part in a Nazi gun-grab. I would not have to look for them. I would just quietly wait at the house for them. Most of the posts the LEO's were giving were frightening. ie...Even though they know it would be against the Bill of Rights and Second Amendment. They would still do it because it was law. Not very bright gentlemen. The British I believe made a new law raising taxes one day. When they went to enforce it they met with people who believed in freedom and were willing to die for it. Would you rather give your life or risk it for a law or freedom? Also, if they made it law to shoot on sight anyone who was speeding. Would you do it? You LEO's need to wake up. Nobody is asking you to look the other way in a violent felony or theft that someone has just comitted. We are talking the Bill of Rights and basic human freedom that includes the right to protect ourselves. Because whether you want to admit it or not. You guys show up AFTER something happens and wouldn't be able to protect me or family. I wish they would give you more help so you could actually prevent crime but it won't happen anytime soon I am afraid. So I take it upon myself to give my family protection from the BG's in the world. You take that away and I would be at your mercy. Not gonna happen without my blood and alot of other good people's blood being shed. I think the LEO's need to really think about it because the way things are going in today's times. It might not be long before you have to deal with this kind of situation. Oh by the way, my dad and brother were and are LEO's. I have respect for the ones that try to be a positive influence on this world. I have contempt for those that use their badge only for their own personal gain...ie...power,self-importance and prestige. |
|
How many times can a guy get banned? I didn't have any say about letting him back in!
If a snake promises not to bite you again, would you let him in out of the cold to warm up? Hell no, you would blow his head off or let the SOB freeze in the snow. Same story here. If I had my way, Garandtwit would join him. |
|
Quoted: How many times can a guy get banned? I didn't have any say about letting him back in! If a snake promises not to bite you again, would you let him in out of the cold to warm up? Hell no, you would blow his head off or let the SOB freeze in the snow. Same story here. If I had my way, Garandtwit would join him. View Quote Not a great comparison. McLandon has shown intelligence... |
|
He was an arrogant, instigating, penis. But he is like a cat and he has'nt used up all his lives. He will be back.
|
|
Quoted: Even with his inability to hold his tongue I think this place isn't nearly as fun without him. I just learned to take what he said with a grain of salt. And, for the most part, I agreed with the post that got him banned. Anyone enforcing tyranical laws is a tyrant, no matter what badge or uniform they wear. However, I don't believe in what he said about going out and hunting down LEO's because they are inherently evil. To do so would be an evil act in itself, because all LEO's are not evil. Most of the ones I have met have been good people. God Bless Texas View Quote That's what I said. But then Dave_G(mod of the maintance forum) came down on me like I was the devil, and everybody went nuts, and I got removed as moderator, despite saying nothing different from you. [:(] |
|
The real point about carrots is that he is internally undisciplined. He has no ability to hold his tongue when the situation calls for it.
Until he learns that lesson he will continue to be an entertaining loose cannon, instead of a wise adult. IMHO, unless he changes, and radically, he will wind up VERY badly. I see a surefire collision course between him and some cop somewhere, sometime. That boy's got too much undisciplined brains NOT to get him into BIG trouble sometime. Sad to say, unless he changes, you can count on it. Seen it before, dammit. |
|
As amusing as he is, how many times does a guy get another chance before it's his last?
|
|
Well, being one of the threatened people I can tell ya I will quickly get over my sense of loss. I totally disagreed with his whole post as the tantrum of a spoiled child.
What I say may scare you but here goes. I believe strongly in supporting the constitution and the various ammendments. That being said, all written words are subject to interpretation. Our system has checks and balances that may or may not agree. The supreme court has the final say and theirs is the interpretation I will follow in enforcing the various laws passed by the legislature. I do not follow my own interpretations unless no prior interpretation exhists. I am quite sure that those who disagree will cause an interpretation to be made and this will be the law of the land. We are discussing committing violent acts over things here, not lost lives or societal freedom. If enough people don't like the way the law is they will get together and change it. Hopefully through elections and other legal means. There are proper ways to go about changing unjust laws and threatening violence is usually the best way to convince those that passed these laws that they were right, and seek even more restrictive legislation. That leaves the simple choice, political activist, or martyr. Lets see a real adult show of hands of who would choose the latter. Things can be replaced, people cannot. Just my thoughts. |
|
Quoted: That leaves the simple choice, political activist, or martyr. View Quote shotar, there is another choice which you have left out. I really don't want to get into this whole mess, but I'm sure someone will.... |
|
Shotar, the easiest way to get laws changed is to PAY the politicians to change them... MUCH easier than taking to the streets, and a damn sight safer.
Learn how to manipulate the system. |
|
I really love this discussion. Tired, but nevertheless....The Costitution, B of R, Dec of Independance in my mind was written by men moved by the Spirit of God.Having read the Bible in its entirety a good number of times,I quickly recognize words chosen by men with a fear of God.Because I believe that Gods greatest blessing on the USA was the revelation of The Spirit in the authors, I will defend the Constitution,against enemies foreign or domestic, no matter who they claim to represent." I'm just doing my job", are the words of a man who is a slave to his employer. The United States was founded by men who took their freedom and rights against tyrannical law.Freedom will continue as long as the taking process continues.
|
|
Raf is of course right, wealth makes right, simple proposition, wealth replaced might in our society as the ruling force.
Yes, GT, there is a third option, but there are exactly one of you and 700,000 of us in the brotherhood of blue. If one of us is harmed doing his sworn duty we all were and we all see it that way. The third option if I read you correctly is really a choice, to take the second or at least and hopefully the perpetrator would surrender so that choice # 1 could be worked through the courts. If anyone thinks that the masses are ready go to that choice they are sadly deluded. I have dealt with gangs ( similar line of thinking ) they are brave en masse and usually surrender alone. Only a full blown loon would face off and expect to come out ok in the end, thus my reasoning here. No, I do not like certain laws, and I do believe in the 2nd amendment, but I also believe it has limits as do most of the amendments, any law that is an absolute is probably unjust. All things must be interpreted within their context and weighed accordingly. The " yelling fire " in a crowded theater test. I could go on, it would not be appreciated, but I am dealing from logical realities. The best way is to elect leaders on our side and petition them for the changes we want. Violence in the current state of society will only be counter productive. |
|
Quoted: I also agree with what I_Luv_Carrots said in the post about the LEO's but again not about going out and hunting them down. Besides if it did come down to an ignorant LEO taking part in a Nazi gun-grab. I would not have to look for them. I would just quietly wait at the house for them. Most of the posts the LEO's were giving were frightening. ie...Even though they know it would be against the Bill of Rights and Second Amendment. They would still do it because it was law. Not very bright gentlemen. The British I believe made a new law raising taxes one day. When they went to enforce it they met with people who believed in freedom and were willing to die for it. Would you rather give your life or risk it for a law or freedom? Also, if they made it law to shoot on sight anyone who was speeding. Would you do it? You LEO's need to wake up. Nobody is asking you to look the other way in a violent felony or theft that someone has just comitted. We are talking the Bill of Rights and basic human freedom that includes the right to protect ourselves. Because whether you want to admit it or not. You guys show up AFTER something happens and wouldn't be able to protect me or family. I wish they would give you more help so you could actually prevent crime but it won't happen anytime soon I am afraid. So I take it upon myself to give my family protection from the BG's in the world. You take that away and I would be at your mercy. Not gonna happen without my blood and alot of other good people's blood being shed. I think the LEO's need to really think about it because the way things are going in today's times. It might not be long before you have to deal with this kind of situation. Oh by the way, my dad and brother were and are LEO's. I have respect for the ones that try to be a positive influence on this world. I have contempt for those that use their badge only for their own personal gain...ie...power,self-importance and prestige. View Quote Notice the silence on this well stated post. And you even disagreed with hunting them down. He's right. LEO's you can't straddle the fence. You either believe in the Bill of Rights or you don't. Now I would only advocate violence against anyone as an extreme, last respot measure of defense for myself. But I would fight to defend the Constitution. I would fight against other American's who would try to harm me in their effort to take my rights away. You guys are great but you have to do more to educate your force-mates. |
|
Quoted: Raf is of course right, wealth makes right, simple proposition, wealth replaced might in our society as the ruling force. Yes, GT, there is a third option, but there are exactly one of you and 700,000 of us in the brotherhood of blue. If one of us is harmed doing his sworn duty we all were and we all see it that way. The third option if I read you correctly is really a choice, to take the second or at least and hopefully the perpetrator would surrender so that choice # 1 could be worked through the courts. If anyone thinks that the masses are ready go to that choice they are sadly deluded. I have dealt with gangs ( similar line of thinking ) they are brave en masse and usually surrender alone. Only a full blown loon would face off and expect to come out ok in the end, thus my reasoning here. No, I do not like certain laws, and I do believe in the 2nd amendment, but I also believe it has limits as do most of the amendments, any law that is an absolute is probably unjust. All things must be interpreted within their context and weighed accordingly. The " yelling fire " in a crowded theater test. I could go on, it would not be appreciated, but I am dealing from logical realities. The best way is to elect leaders on our side and petition them for the changes we want. Violence in the current state of society will only be counter productive. View Quote Would you participate in the willful, complete disarming of American citizens? Would you force ALL law-abiding citizens to surrender their last .22? Their last .177? |
|
SHIT!, shotar, I am sorry that you interpreted my response as an attack against LEOs. It wasn't. What I was trying to say was that there are those that will stand up to a superior force through political means, and be defeated. Then there are those who will stand up to a superior force through physical means, and be defeated. Those are the martyrs. Then there are those who will stand up against a superior force and NOT be defeated. There will be people who give the Constitution BACK to our country. Many of them will come from your ranks, and from mine.
|
|
No, Ben I would not participate in this, nor would I deny protected speach, nor would I conduct a search I believed to be illegal. I would certainly disarm persons who had been relieved of their rights due to status. I do believe that convicted felons are not entitled to the same rights as the law abiding. I also believe in not living in extremes. We live in the real world, with real people and we are fallable. That said, we have the greatest legal system in the world. It is by no means perfect, but it is the best in the world. Let it work and it usually evens out in the end. What gets to me are the extremists who usually screwed up and made life harder for those of us who follow the law. This is what mcnutbag was being, he was advocating violence against people. The ideals should be upheld but we still have a constitutional framework to do this in. We have not degenerated to the point of extremes as some would like to advocate. Do I think every law abiding citizen should have the right to own arms, Yes. Do I think everyone should have this right, no. Do I think there should be some limitations on what differentiates arms from destructive devices, Yes. Do I think our current situation is intolerable, no. Although I do think some of the laws are stupid. The AWB really does not bother me because I never really had a need for a folding stock, flash hider or bayonet. I don't think it prevents any crime either, therefore it is a stupid law. BTW I couldn't tell a preban from postban on mere glance and someone would pretty much have to do something pretty ignorant to get me to look further. If your stuff is legal, No problem, if it aint, your problem. The constitution is the supreme law of our land. It can however be changed and if it were then that changed document would be the supreme law of the land. If it gets changed, like it or not, it is our fault. We elect those that make these changes. The goal therefore is to elect legislators who will vote our will as the people and keep what we want, and reject what we won't. They will surely please the majority but not all the time.
|
|
Yes, GT, there is a third option, but there are exactly one of you and 700,000 of us in the brotherhood of blue. If one of us is harmed doing his sworn duty we all were and we all see it that way View Quote If anyone thinks that the masses are ready go to that choice they are sadly deluded. I have dealt with gangs ( similar line of thinking ) they are brave en masse and usually surrender alone. Only a full blown loon would face off and expect to come out ok in the end, thus my reasoning here View Quote Funny how this gang mentality never applies to LEO's. It is strange how you contradict yourself. When it comes to a question of enforcing an unjust law you say as an LEO you are not to interpret the law just enforce it. Yet you state that: No, I do not like certain laws, and I do believe in the 2nd amendment, but I also believe it has limits as do most of the amendments, any law that is an absolute is probably unjust View Quote Sounds like interpretation to me. Do you just interpret for us or when on the job or when on the crapper or just when the occasion calls for it in general. Violence in the current state of society will only be counter productive. View Quote I know, maybe if we go over to Afghanistan and ask Bin Laden nicely. He will not hurt us again. I just love Political Correctness...makes me all warm and gooey inside. |
|
I wonder if these same LEO's would give up all of their own personally owned, non-duty weapons in order to comply with an outright ban. Yup, all duty weapons would stay in the police armory until your shift started, and would be turned in at the end of your shift. Strict squad accountability of all ammo and gear as well- nothing that a civilian couldn't take home. You can bet your sweet ass that they wouldn't go along with this- they coudln't continue to play the "I have more rights than you" game. Of course, any gun ban wouldn't apply to LEO's, that why so many of them are so apathetic towards the 2nd Amendment (present company aside).
Very sad to see how someone will so bravely pledge to enforce a proposed law that would destroy the citizenry's God-given right to self defense, while that same law would have absolutely no effect upon them. Sounds similar to the British loyalists during the Revolutionary War- spineless, brain-washed, and DEAD wrong. [historical speculation mode on] 700,000 'peace officers' versus five million NRA members-well not really. I'll bet that around 500,000 (10%) of the NRA's boys would actually be willing to engage in Civil War Part II, and that around 100,000 LEO's would side with the NRA. That makes it approx. 600K well armed and supplied troops apiece- I don't think it would be pretty, but I think we would still have a 2nd Amendment when we got done killing each other. [historical speculation mode off] |
|
"The whole of the Bill of Rights is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered individuals...It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789
So if what I'm reading, and maybe I'm reading something into it that is'nt there, but it sounds like if the majority of the American people vote for no more 2nd, then the LEO's would enforce it. Even though it is CLEAR that it would be a violation of the Constitution NO MATTER WHAT THE INTERPRETATION. |
|
To remove an amendment from the constitution would in itself require an amendment to the constitution. See prohibition. However, it is unprecedented to remove one of the Bill of Rights. WAY different. Never been done.
|
|
Blackeye:
You bore me. I can certainly have personal feelings that are separate from professional, I was however dealing with reality not philosophy here. Of course cops have a seige mentality at times, any wonder when the wonderful wapsticks would rather shoot at you than get to know what you really think. You need to read a bit deeper. Now I do not believe in negotiating with terrorits and of course there are no courts governing the actions of them, they in our current crisis operate outside laws. That leaves the options at hand. If I read you right you want to join them, well then ya gets what ya gets. I wish you well. We, however as LEOs and citizens do live as civilized members of a society of laws and do have recourse. I really don't care if you don't like the laws or not. If not seek political redress to change them but I cannot and will not abide murder and I will do whatever within the law I need to to bring those who would do these things to justice. Now as to the intent of my post, IE dealing with reality, in the current state of affairs, anyone who thinks all there buddies are jumping into their fight with the cops is nuts. Its a no win situation and as much as you bluster you would be a fool. That is why I say don't bluster and pontificate violence. It is a fools errand. BTW I certainly don't enjoy the same right to free speach that you do. Everything has its tradeoffs. But I do get letterhead price and issued FA when needed. |
|
The depth of some gun owner’s ignorance never fails to amaze me.
Now it's been about 25 years since I took civic's so somebody correct me if I'm wrong here but I do seem to recall the it was the mission of the police to arrest people and bring them before the courts where a jury of 12 would determine guilt or innocence. I have no issue with a cop arresting me for doing something stupid and bringing me before the courts. That's their job >.< I would have problem with a police officer issuing me a citation and then giving me the trial on the streets and carrying out the punishment - sort of Taliban style. When I've served on military police assignments I generally always went into a brawl with a 2:1 advantage. It's not a WWF match so there are no rules that I need to follow concerning matching numbers with the group of people I'm attempting to apprehend. Having had my ass kicked more than once by a group of men I really don't treasure the feeling of one guy getting pounded by ten times his body mass. Others seem to disagree on this feeling. If there are posters here don't know the difference between a street gang and a police officer they have issues and I don't think they it. Having grown up in one of the bleakest parts of south Chicago (101st and Hasted) as a poor white boy I know gangs. When I'm with 10 Black Disciples that's one sort of party, when I'm with 10 of Chicago's finest it's another. McUzi is a geek in the classical circus sense. He bites the heads off of chickens here to entertain us. He is such a source of entertainment that people here worship him and possibly use his outlandish sense of morals to justify their own bad behavior. He stirs up hate for honest law enforcement officers and constantly race bates with Jews and Blacks. He has deep personality issues that he has yet to face. McUzi is saying what Steve Anderson on Assaultweb.com did is a justifiable thing. A police officer pulled over Anderson a week or so ago and Anderson opened up on the cop putting like 20 bullets into the cruiser and hit the cop too. Guess the cop had it comming in some of your eyes eh? By all means kill the messenger but don't get upset when his buddy puts 156 grains of high speed metal though your still warm brain. Hopefully when these people grow wiser they'll learn the meanings of the words they sling about so quickly. |
|
Quoted: To remove an amendment from the constitution would in itself require an amendment to the constitution. See prohibition. However, it is unprecedented to remove one of the Bill of Rights. WAY different. Never been done. View Quote I'm assuming that was in reply to my post? I was speaking hypothetically of course.[;)] |
|
I also believe in not living in extremes. We live in the real world, with real people and we are fallable. View Quote I agree with some of what was said in this original post above, but too soon does everyone here forget that the government has strayed far beyond its constitutional powers. If Uncle Sam were to come knocking on my door for me to give up my guns (not because I had done anything wrong) whoever was on the other side wouldhave to pry them from my cold dead hands. As far as not being a extremist - on some issues I am VERY extreme, but thats a good thing because after all this country was made by people like me. People who didn't give a shit what happened to them, or what the majority of the populace thought (the revolution was not a vastly popular war in the states), or what they had to give up, they stood for their beliefs and the opportunity to have a free country. And to some extent the idea that one person can change this is a farse that the government would like for you to believe so that you feel good about yourself. Was welfare ever voted on? Was public housing or the public works project ever voted on? These were all created by executive order by FDR. There is too much power in the federal government. After the Civil War, when states rights were stripped away, the delicate balance of local and national government was ruined. Uncle Sam has grown ever since. I guess my whole rant here is that If it took myself being a martyr because of what I believe in, then so be it. "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots." Furthermore, I can say that I truly believe that if Washington and Jefferson were alive today, they would own a full unregistered M16. The whole reason for the second is so that the PEOPLE can defend the country AND guard against tyranny in government. It is written to guarantee the people the right to own weapons that are on a equivalent level with what the military is using. Not to hunt with, or target shoot, or have slid under your bed and just use for break-ins (although this was a intent as well it was not the only intent.) You LEO's need to read the Federalist papers. You will get some insight into just how important firearm ownership is and what it was TRULY intended for. My cousin is a LEO as well as one of my good freinds. They both are very well educated and are police only because they choose to be. They enjoy the work not the pay. Both have read the federalist papers, etc. When I questioned my cousing about U.S. taking away guns he stated he would not do this, because his first duty is to uphold the constitution of the united states. When asked about firearm ownership and why it is important both answered first for defense, second for guarding against tyranny in Government. Chris Williams [edited to add] I am in no way a anti government advocate. I only believe that the government is too big for its own good. Our founders were wise enough to account for human sin and worked this into the government through checks and balances. The lagest check and balance was taken away (sovereign states rights). Voting can make a difference I guess, its just that by the time a cantidate is a politician, he is just that - a politician. |
|
"Shotar, the easiest way to get laws changed is to PAY the politicians to change them... MUCH easier than taking to the streets, and a damn sight safer.
Learn how to manipulate the system. " Ayn Rand just rolled in her grave. |
|
Blackeye: You bore me. I can certainly have personal feelings that are separate from professional, I was however dealing with reality not philosophy here. Of course cops have a seige mentality at times, any wonder when the wonderful wapsticks would rather shoot at you than get to know what you really think. You need to read a bit deeper. Now I do not believe in negotiating with terrorits and of course there are no courts governing the actions of them, they in our current crisis operate outside laws. That leaves the options at hand. If I read you right you want to join them, well then ya gets what ya gets. I wish you well. We, however as LEOs and citizens do live as civilized members of a society of laws and do have recourse. I really don't care if you don't like the laws or not. If not seek political redress to change them but I cannot and will not abide murder and I will do whatever within the law I need to to bring those who would do these things to justice. Now as to the intent of my post, IE dealing with reality, in the current state of affairs, anyone who thinks all there buddies are jumping into their fight with the cops is nuts. Its a no win situation and as much as you bluster you would be a fool. That is why I say don't bluster and pontificate violence. It is a fools errand. BTW I certainly don't enjoy the same right to free speach that you do. Everything has its tradeoffs. But I do get letterhead price and issued FA when needed. View Quote shotar: While garnering the ability to pontificate you are none the less disillusioned. Reality is exactly the realm I am debating. You seem to be convinced that you will be able to come in to my house and kill me if need be, to get my weapons. Also that I am blustering and no one will side with me and join in the fight against an attack on my freedom. That's a laughable and ignorant statement at best. If the police were video-taped storming the house of a man, who has no prior convictions or indictments, and kill him in the process of confiscating his weapons and it were viewed on CNN. The American public would be outraged. You would look like jack-booted Gestapo thugs storming into peoples houses to get their weapons. The resistance to your oppressive behavior at first would be light. Then Americans would get organized and be waiting for you..... If you hadn't noticed lately, that is exactly the same attitude that the terrorist's who are attacking our country harbor. They feel JUSTIFIED by their religion to kill, poison and take our freedom and they think we are too weak and soft to put up any sort of fight. They feel also that this their duty. Therefore, it sounds like maybe it is you who would like to join them. If you read in my first reply on this post. There are two kinds of LEO's. I think we know which one you represent. Oh by the way, my dad and brother were and are LEO's. I have respect for the ones that try to be a positive influence on this world. I have contempt for those that use their badge only for their own personal gain...ie...power,self-importance and prestige View Quote |
|
I have been following this and several other anti- LEO threads. I of course have my own views derived from what I beleive to be reasonable realities. There are of course abuses but I'm sure the degree tends to stem from the POV of the reader.
1) the gov't aint comin to take your squirl rifle, AR, AK or anything else, as long as it is within specs and your states don't pass unconstitutional laws. Even if they did, LEOs would only be coming after you brought attention to yourself. Neither the inkling to nor the manpower. 2) Anyone advocating shooting people is just as guilty as the nut who does. 3) I have followed a thread about alleged abuse but in final distillation the guy really excersized poor judgement on Halloween night. The cops don't know your not a nut till they investigate, and then are probably a bit perturbed that the person was dumb enough to cause the problem anyway. Sad part is he will probably win the lawsuit. Others will lionize him as a victim of the oppressor. This was done with kids trick or treating, cops were more worried about safety from an unknown than his right to troll the neighborhood with AR and rangebag in the car though, just bad form. In another thread, The ATF busted a detroit area gun dealer, the reporter of course demonized the weapons, silly, but normal. Wagons of course circled against the JBs, Reality check, The ATF actually performed a great service to gun owners by removing an unscrupulous dealer that had been purporting illegally modified post bans to be prebans and ripping off honest but unsuspecting citizens by selling to them contraband at preban prices, GO FEDS. Glad I'm not one of the people burned by these ripoff artists and I'm glad the feds got them. Still another about cops being murdered by lunatics calling themselves patriots, Most responses were good, but yet again the usual suspects show up to circle the wagons. Given these facts, it is no wonder that cops are suspicious of gun owners. This level changes with geography but these are just a few examples. I for one do not fear law abiding gun owners, but, if I encounter you armed I will not presume good intent on your part. I will act in the interest of my safety and that of those around me, yours included. Your temporary inconvenience is not worth my life, if you think otherwise, too bad, at that moment you are not in charge, I am. To rap this up Mcnutbag is an immature child and a waste of air. Purhaps one day he will grow up and join the rest of us in a civilized society but his constant rants of bigotry and hatred will not be missed. I personally picture him as a brilliant but disaffected 15 year old with a red ryder who dreams of grandure and gets a woody from working other people into a lather. |
|
shotar:
To beleive that you can merely bring someone down who is "dissobeying the law" is lunacy. remember those guys in cali, who it took tons of police, guns, etc. to bring down? Well I can tell you a few reasons why this happened. Better Funding, Better weapons, Better equipment. As a private citizen I have a hand up on you sir. I can carry whatever I want. I can load up with AP (30-06 or ss109) if I decide to do so. If ANYONE comes to deprive me of my FREEDOMS some of you WILL leave in a body bag. Last I checked gas masks are still available as well. Oh, and night vision - no problem (when the last time you saw a beat officer pull out a set of gen III). So now tell me what advantage do you have over the average citizen that you would deprive of their rights? I can go to some of the best arms training available, why? because I paid for it. You however have to get your captain or chief to sign off on it and you also have budgetary constraints. To say "anyone who thinks all there buddies are jumping into their fight with the cops is nuts. Its a no win situation and as much as you bluster you would be a fool" is a FOOLISH statement and shows just how naive you really are. I have a bit of insight for you, you should fear the day this happens because you would find out just how wrong you were. After hearing some of the foolish comments you have made, I can understand how McUzi got mad and out of control. As far as being a cop Killer - you read too much into posts. I am merely prepared. I am prepared number 1 for defense of country (The people are the militia) and number 2 to guard against a tyrannical government. Numver 3 is for self defense, number 4 is just because its fun to shoot. If you heed your calling and that is to protect and to serve (abiding by the constitution) you will have no problems. You are a representative of government. What will you do when they tell you to come take everyones guns (if they do - this is speculation as was McUzi's). |
|
3) I have followed a thread about alleged abuse but in final distillation the guy really excersized poor judgement on Halloween night. The cops don't know your not a nut till they investigate, and then are probably a but perturbed that the person was dumb enough to cause the problem anyway. Sad part is he will probably win the lawsuit. Others will lionize him as a victim of the oppressor. This with kids trick or treating were more worried about safety from an unknown than his right to troll the neighborhood with AR and rangebag in the car though, just bad form. View Quote The person did not cause this problem, shotar, an LEO with an overactive imagination and using illegal tactics did. I do not think it will be sad when he wins his lawsuit. It will represent the court system keeping the LEO's in check. You know, checks and balance system you seem to refer to quite often. The man was retrieving anti-freeze from his trunk and had to move his weapon to get at it. No intent whatsoever in those actions. If it had been a bolt-action rifle in the gun case, would the LEO's have over-reacted? I also don't see him trolling the neighborhood. He and his children were enjoying quality time when a Barney Fife squad shows up and basically abuses him. I am just glad there was not a tall child walking by dressed up like a soldier because I see the real possibility of these LEO's mistaking his toy pop gun as an assault rifle and him being this guys accomplice. You and your attitude that whatever LEO's do is automatically justifiable and what civilians do is automatically devious behavior is the reason for anti-LEO posts. |
|
To All LEO's:
I understand you must uphold the laws of the land, but your sworn to also uphold the constitution. When one line crosses another what will you do? When Uncle Sam takes away freedom of speech and asks you to arrest someone for it, Or creates a law making all handguns illegal, will you come and take them? The Blind LEO's who are followers are just the kind of people they will need to accomplish this if it happens. I have a lot of respect for what LEO's do on a daily basis, and the turds you deal with. My hat is off to you in this respect. Shot Ar's accusation that I am anti-LEO is bullshit and shows the stupidity of some. By making that statement he has shown his inability for subjective thought. Stop living in your box and get the big picture. I personally know probably 10 different LEO's, I shoot with them, my wife hangs out with their wives, We spend Holidays together. So I pity those that do not understand freedom and what it takes to keep it. The mind that does not comprehend the sacrifices associated with freedom is never really free. Chris Williams [Edited to Add] Disclaimer - I do not own any illegal firearms, All of my firearms are within legal standards. Also, In the defense of freedoms you must draw the line somewhere. I draw mine at my ability to maintain my own freedom (firearms). An armed citizen is a just that. A disarmed person is a subject. I would not "shoot up" an LEO for asking me a question about a rifle in my trunk, or giving me a speeding ticket, or responding to other daily duties. I would however have his job if I believed that he was abusing his powers or harrasing citizens (It's amazing what a few well placed complaints about an abusive officer will get you [:P]. |
|
Given these facts, it is no wonder that cops are suspicious of gun owners. This level changes with geography but these are just a few examples. I for one do not fear law abiding gun owners, but, if I encounter you armed I will not presume good intent on your part. I will act in the interest of my safety and that of those around me, yours included. Your temporary inconvenience is not worth my life, if you think otherwise, too bad, at that moment you are not in charge, I am. View Quote My temporary inconvience due to your (everybody's a criminal attitude) is a violation of my freedom in-itself. But thats OK because YOU ARE IN CHARGE. Do you drool on yourself with the power rush when you put your uniform on? While your motives of being an LEO are obviously self-serving and your unrealistic idealogy might frighten some individuals. You only make me laugh with a hint of disgust and contempt. |
|
I have been following this and several other anti- LEO threads. I of course have my own views derived from what I beleive to be reasonable realities. There are of course abuses but I'm sure the degree tends to stem from the POV of the reader View Quote This is not an anti-LEO thread. It's an anti-idiot thread. LEO's like my father was and brother continues to be. Do an admirable job because they are protecting and serving the public. Not just blindly enforcing the law. Had I not gone to college and went into a different field. I would probably be on the blue line. shotar is using this anti-LEO claim to hide behind. |
|
Quoted: You and your attitude that whatever LEO's do is automatically justifiable and what civilians do is automatically devious behavior is the reason for anti-LEO posts. View Quote Ah yes the cornerstone of corruption. |
|
Quoted: I have been following this and several other anti- LEO threads. 3) I have followed a thread about alleged abuse but in final distillation the guy really excersized poor judgement on Halloween night. The cops don't know your not a nut till they investigate, and then are probably a bit perturbed that the person was dumb enough to cause the problem anyway. Sad part is he will probably win the lawsuit. Others will lionize him as a victim of the oppressor. This was done with kids trick or treating, cops were more worried about safety from an unknown than his right to troll the neighborhood with AR and rangebag in the car though, just bad form. View Quote |
|
A pink bunny[img]http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/bunny.gif[/img]ate him.
|
|
I've said it before. NO ONE SAW HIS GUN! Someone saw his range bag or guncase. For all someone knew it had fishing poles in it.
Oneshot, correct me if I'm wrong. I have worked in LE and have MANY family members that do. I know the job. I respect the job. But I find that there are those who forget that while they wear a badge, they are just an every day person like the rest of us. They are a civilian. You have 2 categories. Military and civilian. Police officers are not military. Most of the officers I know understand this and live accordingly. Unfortuntely, there are those like the ones that Oneshot had to deal with that give a VERY BAD name to all of the other great ones that do such a good job every day, but never get credit for. |
|
Now you tell me who acted like a dummy? They know what they did was wrong and in violation of my rights, and now they are trying to bury it FAST. But it's too late for them, don't make the same mistake, I hope you learned something from my ordeal. You can't take a law abiding citizen and cross the line just because you don't expect the average man to arm themselves. Well I am not the average man, and I know more about my weapons and the legal use of deadly force than most of my local LEOS... View Quote I do not see this LEO learning anything from your misfortune oneshot1kill. He is too jaded to think objectively. When he see's you or me. He does not see a civilian... just someone who isn't an LEO. Until this mindset is changed we will continue to suffer from their (we are automically a criminal attitude) that some LEO's carry with them while at work. I guess the idea we are innocent until proven guilty only applies after the LEO's finish with us. |
|
Great the way some respond here to logic, as to the kind of LEO I am, well, lets see in 15 years the badge isn't as heavy as it once was. I generally try to treat people with courtesy and respect and have never been accused of undue force. I have been sent to 10 full blown gang wars, arrested ( including traffic ) around 5000 people lost count around 3789. I have also personally saved 14 lives through intervention. Not bad for a career. I have never conducted an illegal search and I have played by the rules. I have been stabbed once, shot at 5 times and returned fire 3 times. ALL are still alive and incarcerated. I have changed old ladies tires, held a mothers hand while she prayed over her dead infant son and burried 3 coworkers who were lost in the line of duty. I have tried to do this fairly and without prejudice. I have also supported and encouraged programs to teach gun safety and good marksmanship to young people.
You are correct, the criminal always chooses the time and manner of the encounter. The cop is usually outgunned. As to my contention of the cops being victorious in this glorious battle for rights, I am also right. Not because of some illconceived gun grab that I would not support, but because for the first one that falls there will be more to take their place, and help will be on the way. I say it is foolhardy to resist in the short term because I do value life. I would note that when those of that mind have resisted oft times the result has been tragedy. The cops are not going to be scared and go away. The correct forum to fight the hypothetical gun grabbers is before the fact through legislation, or after the fact in court. I still say there was more to the halloween story than meets the eye, and note, I agreed his rights were probably violated. I also feel just as strongly that he used poor judgement by loading up before going out. I left mine at home that night, and I can carry legally. I would bet that by monday he will have his rifle back with an apology. At best these guys were over zealous in their approach, but this is also a night the they were on high alert for trouble. Read my response to that thread and you would see a bit more depth. I am not and never have been in favor of either weapons confiscation or prohibition for those who can legally own them. I also don't like being threatened by someone who is going to hunt me down. I work in a county with about 98% weapons ownership and don't spend my day in fear, I know that most of those good folks would gladly come to my aid in an emergency and thank them. I also know that I have had one close friend shot for stopping a so called patriot for a license plate violation. Seems my buddy impeded his right to travel on the public road so he haulded out and shot him. My point being that the cops are pretty much trying to do a good job for the public. There are rules that most people follow, others however choose not to. That is why we have cops. Just don't presume to think you know me by my very abbreviated opinions here. You don't. I would probably be the one yelling stop when your rights were being violated. Just remeber your rights only extend so far as they don't impeded the rights of others. |
|
Just a point for further discussion. Is the right to Life, Liberty, and the persuit of happiness an absolute? If it is, Who determines how far it goes or what makes someone happy? How would the governement enforce any law if the lawbreaker claimed he did it because he said it made him happy and he demanded his liberty and life be unhindered. Looking for well reasoned responses. Because if these primary rights from the declaration can be limited within a framework of laws, then so can all the others. Look forward to your spirited debate. Be safe and enjoy.
|
|
libertyof76,
You were bumped because of what you posted; near total support for what McUzi wrote on the public forums. All I did was play "Bad Cop - Worse Cop" on you to jack you up and expose you for what you are. You are still blaming others instead of being an adult and taking responsibility for your own actions. |
|
[left]Paul: You have no issue with police arresting you well, you must live a good life but cop's here just bytes. I was coming home from school (Night Classes), and this so called cop pulled up behind me and I slowed below the posted speed 45 in a 55 get real but the COP decides to make up some of his own rules and stop's me anyway's i told him bluntly why in the %^&*&* hell did you stop me for, he replyed well I called in your plates and there must be a glitch in the system they returned expired! i said no way! he said I realized there not expired I said mybe I should call up the BMV and ask he replyed NO! NO! NO! whala cought him in a lie! then he stuck his face right in my face and try to get me on a drinking charge!!! well there's more to the story! I asked one more question what about that NY guy on here that got busted, and set up? this seem's to me that there is no such thing has right's or the constitution any more LEO's can do just about anything they want, and get away with it. I do have proof, and lots of example's of police abuse's that happen here. what am i sopposed to
do tell the LEO "THANK YOU SIR" for slapping the cuff's on me for yelling at the neighbor to shut the hell up iam trying to sleep?[/left] |
|
Oneshot:
In my earlier post I fear that I did not give your situation due consideration. Yours is unique in that your local police did act deplorably and I feel this on a far more personal basis than you know due to the plight of a family member in another jurisdiction who was seriously done wrong by some hillbilly social worker types in another jurisdiction. That being said, I stated that I thought you used bad judgement. I also considered as you did carrying that night. It would be perfectly legal for me to due so as an off duty Deputy Sheriff, even though I live out of County. I chose not to because I realized the likelyhood of being attacked was really lower than the likelyhood of causing alarm to others if my pistol was observed with all those kids around. I clearly understand what your intentions were as far as protecting your children therefore my comment earlier about there being more here than your put in your original post, ie loading the car for the range. I also understand that your intentions were not evil. The first responding officer probably did not know these things and who knows, may have never encountered an AR before except in training. You freaked him. I certainly do encourage you to seek redress, my statement that this was sad was in fact a reference to my belief that you could have prevented this by earlier choices in the day. The best outcome would probably be no harm, no foul, go home. If you are truly interested in bettering the situation in your community see if they have a reserve unit and join. It might give you a broader perspective. Perhaps my views are a bit skewed having worked urban ( metro housing authority PD) and Rural ( where we know our citizens and trust them, well at least the good ones) We really don't have repressive gun laws here for the most part and I don't get freaked seeing an AR in the living room. I probably would if I saw one come out in the city as my past experience tells me whatever is next is probably not good. I would based on experience also be extra cautious on Halloween. I wasn't there, didn't have contact with you and probably couldn't tell you what I'd do, but I probably would have given your rifle back no later than the next morning in the worst case. At best I would have asked you to take it home but I don't know the laws in your state. Here there would have been no law violated and I would have probably let you be after determining that. Good luck, I hope all goes well for you. |
|
shotar,
Bravo for the 2 above posts. Thank you for delving in a little deaper than just blindly stated an opinion without any logical backing. I apologize if for my brash comments about you as well, In the context of the above messages my opinion of you has changed. I do agree that laws should be changed within the framework of legislation or in the court system. My only concern is LEO or Military who would blindly violate a constitutional right. If it came down to the defense of freedom or of the constitution from any enemy foreign or domestic, I would stand in its defense. To many men gave their lives for this country to let the tide of poplular opinion or whim of a president or lawmaker take our freedom away. I do not advocate a unjust revolution but a just revolution. If there was indeed a "gun grab" I would have no problem finding supporters of a organized just revolution. And if I couldn't I would just move to Texas ;) Chris Williams |
|
Ah, never slow below the posted speed limit after dark unless the weather calls for it. The police know that this is common behavior for drunken drivers. If you see the police behind you set the cruise control on the limit and watch your lane and your signals [i]very[/i] carefully.
Driving 45 in a 55 isn't stupid so I wouldn't expect to get pulled over. Being in the military I know how to "shine on" the cop - give them respect and a chance to let you go and they're going to do it. I've been pulled over doing 85 in a 65 at 4:45 on the way to work one morning (I was only going a bit faster than traffic) the cop ran my tags, checked my license and insurance and told me to slow down. I've been caught shooting my weapons more than once on prohibited public property. Never a problem. Yes sir, no sir, sorry sir, have a nice day sir. Good-bye! Being respectful ain't going to kill me, spending a day in court, paying a hefty fine, and having my insurance go up might! If people cursed at you all day long and you worked only with the worse of societies issues wouldn't you appreciate running into someone polite? If I was pretty blonde and wore a large bra I might go about it differently but regardless charm works every time! |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.