--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted:
... and the sights are much better than the M1 and M14 type rifles.
!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On what do you base this statement???
SNIPPAGE............
Hey Garandman! Don't take this as a flame, but this was not a statement I made lightly.
I have experience with all the sights in question. I have a dozen or so CMP garands and competed and practiced with a M1A for a couple seasons. After the first year I upgraded the M1a sights to the NM type. Better, but not quite right. I am not shy with a file or metal work, but it was not a rifle I could shoot easily no matter what.
I bought my first AR, an SP1, in 1984 right out of bootcamp. Yeah, the sights suck as bad as the rest of the rifle.
I built up a DCM type AR15 a year ago with target sights. The small aperature and superior ergonomics allow me to place my eye very close to the aperture and allow me to place my head consistantly on the rifle. My practice scores and consistancy jumped dramatically. I do not feel like I am fighting the rifle as with the M1/M14 types, and the ease of the sights.
Also, in my opinion, the sight radius arguement is vastly overrated.
If I were to rate the sights - non combat use - I would rate the A2 target sights top, followed by the M1/M14 target sights, then the GI grade M1/M14, with the A1 sights at the bottom.