Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 3/30/2006 8:56:02 AM EDT
Fairfax, Va.: You said earlier that you only support gun bans if locality votes for them. Why did you support and continue to call for 1994 Assault Weapon Ban that was passed on Federal level?

James and Sarah Brady: I was speaking of bans on all firearms. There has to be a line drawn between legitimate firearms and weapons of war. We don't sell rocket launchers to the civilian population - and assault weapons fall in that category. They have no legitimate purpose except in war.

Link Posted: 3/30/2006 8:59:55 AM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:
Fairfax, Va.: You said earlier that you only support gun bans if locality votes for them. Why did you support and continue to call for 1994 Assault Weapon Ban that was passed on Federal level?

James and Sarah Brady: I was speaking of bans on all firearms. There has to be a line drawn between legitimate firearms and weapons of war. We don't sell rocket launchers to the civilian population - and assault weapons fall in that category. They have no legitimate purpose except in war.




and let's grant them that.... say they're right and the ONLY use for our guns is war.....

then they still remain essential- the second ammendment is to empower citizens to enforce the constitution on the gov't.  the idea was the there may come a day when the civilians need to go to war with the gov't- and should be armed accordingly
Link Posted: 3/30/2006 9:01:21 AM EDT
[#2]
Stop making sense. You'll confuse them.
Link Posted: 3/30/2006 9:04:55 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Fairfax, Va.: You said earlier that you only support gun bans if locality votes for them. Why did you support and continue to call for 1994 Assault Weapon Ban that was passed on Federal level?

James and Sarah Brady: I was speaking of bans on all firearms. There has to be a line drawn between legitimate firearms and weapons of war. We don't sell rocket launchers to the civilian population - and assault weapons fall in that category. They have no legitimate purpose except in war.




and let's grant them that.... say they're right and the ONLY use for our guns is war.....

then they still remain essential- the second ammendment is to empower citizens to enforce the constitution on the gov't.  the idea was the there may come a day when the civilians need to go to war with the gov't- and should be armed accordingly




while *most* of us herre will agree with you on that, they honestly believe that the second was intended for government use only. they honestly believe that being allowed the use of our duck guns is a privilege.


Link Posted: 3/30/2006 9:33:28 AM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Fairfax, Va.: You said earlier that you only support gun bans if locality votes for them. Why did you support and continue to call for 1994 Assault Weapon Ban that was passed on Federal level?

James and Sarah Brady: I was speaking of bans on all firearms. There has to be a line drawn between legitimate firearms and weapons of war. We don't sell rocket launchers to the civilian population - and assault weapons fall in that category. They have no legitimate purpose except in war.




and let's grant them that.... say they're right and the ONLY use for our guns is war.....

then they still remain essential- the second ammendment is to empower citizens to enforce the constitution on the gov't.  the idea was the there may come a day when the civilians need to go to war with the gov't- and should be armed accordingly



This is the ugly truth you'll never hear uttered on Capitol Hill, or in the halls of the highest court.  The attitude is that it's a "hunting amendment", never mind that the term "hunting" is found nowhere in the Constitution.  A large segment of hunters is unfriendly to the 2nd Amendment.

Now, as for this:


Originally Stated By a Couple of Idiots: James and Sarah Brady: I was speaking of bans on all firearms. There has to be a line drawn between legitimate firearms and weapons of war. We don't sell rocket launchers to the civilian population - and assault weapons fall in that category. They have no legitimate purpose except in war.


There's a legal distinction between "arms" (eg. firearms) & "ordnance" (eg. "rocket launchers").  And for the record, it is legal for a civilian to own a grenade launcher.

I wish the SCOTUS would deal w/ the hard truth just once concerning the whole issue.  Pipe dream.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top