Quoted: HA! soooooo ironic. look at this: I said Even Muslims when confronted with these truths end up reverting to lame tactics to excuse it, like "moral equivalency", ad hominem, circular arguements etc.
|
Then pre-medgunner in his very same post writes about this, Same for Christianity, Judaism, and Atheism.
|
he uses moral equvalency all the time, the weakest arguement on the planet. It's like saying, "so what if i am a rapist?? other people rape too! so that makes it OK" Never mind the fact that he includes in his statment Judaism and Atheism.
|
Killing people is inherent in almost all ideologies; it doesn't make it right, but it certainly hints that there is something other than just the religion someone follows that leads to violence... like, for example, the fact that scientifically humans are little more than the common beast, we just have a larger brain that allows us to find better reasons to kill people(in addition to scientific and artistic endeavors).
I've never heard of Athesists chopping off people heads cause someone "belived in God." (and no Communism does'nt count, They killed for economic reasons and even then it was'nt for 1400 years!)
|
Yeah, Chairman Mao killed off over 40 million people for economic reasons... when killing those people put China into the ground even further than it was already in terms of self-sustenance and financial superiority.
Oh yeah and jews too! They own land the size of New Jersey yet they are "world imperialists"! Next thing you know they are going to invade rhode island! does their world domination know no bounds!???
|
They aren't imperialists, they are just tribal, violent people, like the rest of the whole damn group of races from the Middle East.
then there is this fountain of logic: No, I dislike Israeli Jews because they take the term "God's chosen people" and use it to justify any of their actions against Goyim;
|
No you got that wrong, It's the Muslims that do that. Except they call'em infidels and Dhimmi not goyim. If the Isrealis were as blood thirsty as you say why did'nt they in 1948 basically "cleanse" all of Isreal and make it 100% Jewish? Why did'nt they kick out both the muslims AND the Christians and Druze?? Yet in most Islamic countries they have manged to kill off almost ALL the relgious minorities, but thats because they are the "religion of tolerance" i guess.
|
Uhm... apparently you missed your history on the attempt to ethnically cleanse "Palestine" of Arabs so they could set up their homeland; the Jews gained their land through killing people who got in their way and using the world's pity and guilt.
More stupidity follows: Muhammad himself did not scourge across the Middle East, killing everything he saw; by the end of his life, they pretty much had just unified what is modern day Saudi Arabia, Oman,UAE, Kuwait, and a couple other small modern day countries that were complete desert at the time
| No, he did'nt kill all he saw, unless you forced him to! You choice was easy, convert (volutarily ), leave, die or if you were'nt a pagan you could become a second class Dhimmi subject, who paid the Jizzbag tax. What a fucking humanitarian, right?
|
They spared those who were not involved in the conflict, and to the victor goes the spoils. People here are judging Islam entirely on a religious basis, when Islam is more than that: a way of life, a government,etc. Islamic lands did exactly what any government does, levy taxes on its subjects. Levy the Jizya on non-Muslims because non-Muslims cannot give Zakat according to Islamic doctrine.
As to "uniting the Arabian pennensula"?! Well to quote Spock talking to Kahn , "like a team dogs under one whip?" The finally idiocy: countries that were complete desert at the time
| i gotz news for ya, they ARE STILL deserts! any wealth they have now is not from hard work but from the pure luck of geology.
|
The point is: it doesn't take much to conquer a bunch of desert without a lot of people; people here want to make it sound like Muhammad butchered hundreds of thousands of people in his "quest for glory".
I don't view them(Palestineans,Iraqis,etc.) as "my people" any more than I view any impovished group of oppressed people as "my people", besides the fact that we share the same faith.
| Rubbish. Prove it. How do you feel about Checnia, Kosovo, Armenia, East dilli, Kashmir, Sudan and Cyprus?? I bet you dollars to doughnuts you tow the "muslim line" in all those cases. or do you even know about them? I think most preverts to Islam tend to over look it's oppressions of other people around the world.
|
Chechnya is a majority Muslim province, I believe that since Russia is a democracy that the people in Chechnya have the right to gain their independence if it under the popular vote of the people in the province.
Kosovo, I couldn't give a damn about the Armenians, they brought a lot of the problem onto themselves. The Armenians, as a group, ARE a bunch of terrorists and they were invading a sovereign country via illegal channels(most of them in Kosovo were illegal immigrants). I feel angry about the women and children killed, but Armenians did the same against the Serbs; they can both burn.
Kashmir is a bloodbath; two different groups of people from two different countries trying to fight over a province that is worthless. Both sides are at blame here, and I only support the Muslims in their fight slightly more than the Hindus because I am a Muslim, they definitely don't have my full support though.
Sudan: Muslims killing other Muslims over racial tensions; fail to see what part religion has in this fight.