Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
Posted: 3/21/2006 9:02:10 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 3/21/2006 9:05:16 AM EDT by thompsondd]
Remember, you heard it here first....



Subject: Advisory Committee recommends big changes to active duty pay system

Release No. 3-05-06
March 16, 2006

Advisory Committee recommends big changes to active duty pay system

By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

A committee that's spent the past year studying the military compensation system is recommending sweeping changes that, if approved, would bring military compensation more on par with private-sector compensation.

The Defense Advisory Committee on Military Compensation released details of its recommendations today and is incorporating them in a final report expected to go to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld by late April, the committee chairman told the American Forces Press Service.

The Department of Defense announced today that the 10th Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation (QRMC) will begin a review of military compensation on April 1 using the recommendations of the committee.

The package includes two major ideas, retired Navy Adm. Donald Pilling, former vice chief of naval operations, explained. These include revamping the retirement system so service members receive more pay throughout their careers rather than at their completion, and basing pay on performance rather than longevity and other factors, he said.

Pilling emphasized that any proposed changes to the compensation package would be grandfathered in, so currently serving members would not be affected. The only exception could be in the case that current members are offered the opportunity to voluntarily "opt in" to the new system, he said.

In terms of retirement, the committee recommends:

* Vesting members at 10 rather than 20 years;

* Paying graduated retirement plans ranging from 25 percent of base pay at 10 years to 100 percent of base pay at 40 years;

* Establishing a Thrift Savings Plan with government contributions of 5 to 10 percent of base pay;

* Providing "gate pays" at specific service milestones, as determined by the individual services; and

* Delaying payment of the retirement annuity until age 60.

In terms of pay for performance, the committee recommends:

* Revising the pay charts so pay is based on time in grade rather than years of service; and

* Eliminating the "with dependents" and "without dependents" provision of basic allowance for housing so all service members in the same pay grade receive the same allowance, regardless of their family situation.

The proposed system would benefit service members, giving them more upfront cash throughout their careers, Pilling said. He noted that most private-sector compensation packages give 80 percent of their cash up front, deferring just 20 percent for retirement. In contrast, the current military compensation package pays about one-half the total compensation up front and defers the rest.

The committee's recommendations help update the current military retirement system that Pilling said was based on a 1940s-era model. At that time, most members served 30 years, retired in their 50s and typically lived into their 60s, he said. Today, it's typical for service members to retire after 20 years of service to start second careers and to live longer lives.

Restructuring the compensation package will provide more options for service members, Pilling said. Rather than offering no retirement benefit short of 20 years, the proposed system would offer a portable retirement system with reduced-level benefits after 10 years, he explained.

Revising the pay tables to reward time in grade will ensure consistent benefits for service members promoted ahead of their peers, Pilling said. And by paying equal housing allowances to all members of equal grade in equal locations, the proposed system will reward people "for their performance, not their marital status," he said.


While bringing the military pay system more on par with systems in the private sector, Pilling said the proposal maintains sight that service in the military is unique. For example, while it calls for greater cost sharing among Tricare recipients, it continues to ensure full medical care after 20 years of service, he noted.
If Rumsfeld approves the plan, it will be subject to congressional review before being introduced, he said.

The secretary established the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Compensation to study the current pay system and come up with ways to bring it more in line with what service members want and operational needs demand.

The seven-member committee spent a year reviewing the military pay package, holding public hearings and developing its recommendations.




trying to confirm the source and validity
Link Posted: 3/21/2006 9:05:46 AM EDT
don't know what to make of this. the reason the military back loads the pay is to reward time in service. the private sector front loads the $ because people switch jobs more often than they switch underwear.

i like the system as it stands.
Link Posted: 3/21/2006 9:17:53 AM EDT
It would be really nice if they backdated that, to say folks to left in 2001.

I enjoy my DAV check each month, but when I compare it to someone who retired at 20, its pitiful.

And I would finaly be able to say Im retired, vs the "you only did 12, why didnt you stick around for 20" crowd.

Link Posted: 3/21/2006 9:33:34 AM EDT
I can't see offering 10 year retirements, either. They need to weight retirement bennies toward encouraging people to stay in once they get in. I can't see making BAH the same for all areas, either. Some places are more expensive to rent in than others. Of course, if there was sufficient housing on base, it wouldn't be an issue. Nobody would get BAH. That would be the ideal situation.

I do agree with ending things like the With Dependents BAH rate and family seperation pay. Uncle Sugar didn't issue you a spouse and kids. Hell, I'd be hard pressed to justify covering dependents under Tricare before you retire. Cut out all that shit, increase the base pay, and if you want a spouse and 5 kids, pay for medical and dental insurance out of your own pocket.

Top Top