Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 3/8/2006 12:43:31 AM EDT
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 1:15:16 AM EDT
I agree that the UN needs a new building....

In a different country...

Paid for by non-US funds!
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 1:16:41 AM EDT

Originally Posted By CLIP67:
I agree that the UN needs a new building....

In a different country...

With no US involvement...

Paid for by non-US funds!



Link Posted: 3/8/2006 1:21:05 AM EDT
Thanks, I new I was forgetting something!!

Link Posted: 3/8/2006 2:01:14 AM EDT
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 2:01:26 AM EDT
The UN building needs repair via JDAM's.
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 2:04:30 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 3/8/2006 2:05:16 AM EDT by vito113]
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 3:05:20 AM EDT
Change is opportunity.

When dissent rises, we need to find weaknesses in the status quo to cause the organization to collapse frm within.

As far as authority, the best money the US and GB could spend would be on two people assigned a full time job keeping an eye on Annan's every wiggle and contact.

I don't want to use a JDAM on the UN complex, it makes too much dust, and I want to reopen the facility to the homeless, install a live fire training unit on one floor, and force the obese welfare parasites to exercise in the stairwells. Wouldn't make the place a bit nastier or offensive than it is now.
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 3:14:12 AM EDT
give the secretary-general more authority

Let me guess, It's for our own good
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 3:37:51 AM EDT
I'm shocked. Dissent within the org. that is suppoed to bring all the worlds nations into one big happy family. No Way.

Get U.S out of the UN!
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 3:45:27 AM EDT

Originally Posted By vito113:
UN & 'Reform'… now there's a contradiction in terms

Anger
UN diplomats have been cautious in their first response but staff met in a raucous session with Mr Annan, asking for accountability for previous failed reforms.

UN staff committee head Rosemary Waters says 700 employees will campaign "to halt the constant effort of the management to erode the rights and benefits of staff" and management's attempts to eradicate jobs.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200603/s1587165.htm



Yeah, because the UN is really is nothin more than a jobs programme for liberal elites. You'd remove the UN's reason for existance if you cut jobs
Top Top