Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 3/2/2006 7:07:29 AM EDT
Too much interservice rivalries, not enough cooperation or coordination.

Time for an overhaul.

Here's my idea:


Strategic Forces - Basically, our nuclear forces.   What ever resources they need for that.   Subs, ICBM's, bombers, space, etc....


Tactical Forces - Our primary fighting force.   Conventional weapons.  Planes, helicopters, tanks, ships, carriers, etc...


Special Forces - Fast reaction fighting force.   Smaller, more mobile.   Planes, helicopters, tanks, ships, carriers, etc...

Security Forces - Border patrol, coast guard, TSA, etc... all rolled into one.

Give each force what it needs for the mission.  
Link Posted: 3/2/2006 7:22:52 AM EDT
[#1]
I see immediate problems with operational co-operation. Send B-1s out and about, or worse, B-2s, and someone in STRATFOR forgets to tell the TACFOR guys they're out there, and you can see problems showing up. Similarly if an Ohio accidently wanders into an area that a Carrier group wanders into without being told about it. You might think these are easy things to clear up, but we're having troubles enough now as it is. (F-15s vs UH-60s in Iraq, anyone?)

Also, who runs joint bases? B-1s and A-10s at the same base? Or worse, what if you have F-16s equipped with B-61 dial-a-nukes? Do they suddenly come under Strategic control?

NTM
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top