Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 2/5/2006 7:37:32 AM EDT

They always compare Bush to Hitler and Republicans to Nazis.

How come they never compare anyone to Stalin, Mao and Communists?

I mean, if you want to use the worst genocidal dictators to compare to GWBush, why stop at Hitler? He was just a novice compared to Stalin and Mao. Hitler only killed a paltry 10-15 million while Stalin killed an easy 40 million and Mao topped them all with almost 100 million. Why stop at Hitler when hyperbolating about Bush when you have Stalin and Mao who together killed ten times as many people as Hitler?

But I think we all know that answer to that though.

Chavez says Bush worse than Hitler

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez told a rally of thousands of supporters on Saturday that U.S. President George W. Bush was worse than Hitler and vowed to buy more arms to defend his nation as their diplomatic relations deteriorated.

"The imperialist, genocidal, fascist attitude of the U.S. president has no limits. I think Hitler would be like a suckling baby next to George W. Bush," Chavez said from a stage decorated with a huge red image of himself as a young soldier.
.
.
.



Link Posted: 2/5/2006 7:40:03 AM EDT
Duh, they don't actually know any history. "Stalin who?"
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 7:41:29 AM EDT
rhetorical question alert.



most of us already know the answer.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 7:47:05 AM EDT
because they love mao and stalin doesnt have the shock value of hitler to the average idiot
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 9:02:47 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/5/2006 9:25:02 AM EDT by KlubMarcus]

Originally Posted By arfreak74: rhetorical question alert. most of us already know the answer.
Yep, they're commies. So if they want to portray someone in a negative light, they have to use a villian like Hitler. Hitler is evil, but not a commie. And it keeps the sheeple from reading up to find out that communism has killed more people than nazism.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 9:17:29 AM EDT
Don't try to apply logic to anything a leftist says.

The unwritten/unspoken truth is they love Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hugo Chavez, Daniel Ortega, Fidel Castro, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.....

-Scott
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 9:19:33 AM EDT
Love the avatar.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 11:21:48 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Bullitt3401:
Don't try to apply logic to anything a leftist says.

The unwritten/unspoken truth is they love Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hugo Chavez, Daniel Ortega, Fidel Castro, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.....

-Scott



Viva La HipocresĂ­a
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 11:35:29 AM EDT
Because they are lost in there own little world....



Link Posted: 2/5/2006 11:49:28 AM EDT
Cause...people know stalin and mao are leftists.
Everyone is taught fascism is "right wing" when in fact it is left wing.
Everyone likes to pretend Hitler wasn't a socialist.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 12:05:45 PM EDT
One word.

Jews.

Its not kosher to kill jews. There isnt a more touchy feely battle cry than remembering the holocaust. Its one thing that no one can find a defense for. Hitler was an anti-semetic "racist". Liberals want to distance them selves from that.

Mao and Stalin were equal opportunity executioners. They killed anything that got in their way - no basing it on a religion or race.

That and both were "communist" or "socialists" - both of whichs liberals hold as an ideal.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 12:13:52 PM EDT
In promoting world accord under the banner of Marxist-Socialism, Comrades Stalin & Mao restrained the reactionary capitalist exploiters of the proletariat and peasantry until they were poisoned by the Republicans. I blame Bush's daddy or grand daddy.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 1:53:40 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Mister44:
One word.

Jews.

Its not kosher to kill jews. There isnt a more touchy feely battle cry than remembering the holocaust. Its one thing that no one can find a defense for. Hitler was an anti-semetic "racist". Liberals want to distance them selves from that.

Mao and Stalin were equal opportunity executioners. They killed anything that got in their way - no basing it on a religion or race.

That and both were "communist" or "socialists" - both of whichs liberals hold as an ideal.



Hate to say it but +1. The left doesn't care about millions of Chinese/Ukraine/Georgian/Polish/Russian/Estonian/Latvian/Lithuanian/etc folks killed for the better of the People's Collective.
They even ignore the other victims of Nazism (except homosexuals, of course. Can't leave out a major liberal constituency). Gypsies? Who, what? Mentally & physically disabled? Who cares. Minor criminals & trade unionists? Not important. Non communist political prisoners? Never heard of them. The simple fact is that the leftist movement isn't saturated with ethnic Chinese, Ukrainians, etc so their murder by Mao & Stalin might as well not happened as far as the left is concerned. Never mind the fact the Stalin probably killed more Jews than Hitler, he was trying to build a perfect socialist workers paradise so it's all OK. His heart was in the right place after all.
The only difference is that the Soviets didn't document everything in triplecate paperwork & otherwise micromanage everything like the Germans did.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 6:14:09 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/5/2006 6:16:52 PM EDT by The_Macallan]

Originally Posted By Mister44:
One word.

Jews.

Its not kosher to kill jews.
There isnt a more touchy feely battle cry than remembering the holocaust. Its one thing that no one can find a defense for. Hitler was an anti-semetic "racist". Liberals want to distance them selves from that.

Mao and Stalin were equal opportunity executioners. They killed anything that got in their way - no basing it on a religion or race.

That and both were "communist" or "socialists" - both of whichs liberals hold as an ideal.

I don't think so.

Today's moonbats and leftists are clearly and openly on the side of Muslims - both here and in Europe. The Left hates Israel almost as much as the Muslims do.

Who were backing the Syrians and the PLO for so many decades? The USSR and Eurotrash socialists.

Who are the most ardent anti-Israel members of US Congress? Democrats (i.e. the American Communist Party)

Just look at any Communist/Moonbat rally today - do you see ANY Israeli flags? No. But you DO see a lot of Palestinian flags.

Moonbats and Communists are NOT partial to Jews.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 6:55:15 PM EDT

Originally Posted By TheRedHorseman:
because they love mao and stalin doesnt have the shock value of hitler to the average idiot



+1

Link Posted: 2/5/2006 8:12:11 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/5/2006 8:12:50 PM EDT by Max_Mike]

Originally Posted By Mister44:
One word.

Jews.

Its not kosher to kill jews. There isnt a more touchy feely battle cry than remembering the holocaust. Its one thing that no one can find a defense for. Hitler was an anti-semetic "racist". Liberals want to distance them selves from that.

Mao and Stalin were equal opportunity executioners. They killed anything that got in their way - no basing it on a religion or race.

That and both were "communist" or "socialists" - both of whichs liberals hold as an ideal.



That shows a huge ignorance of the modern Left… the modern Left’s view of Jews is indistinguishable from the NAZIs view of Jews. The modern left is violently anti-Semitic… as was Stalin... But then the Nazi’s and Soviets were in truth indistinguishable from each other.

Also deep in their black hearts hard core leftist see Stalin and Moa as heroes.
Top Top