Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 1/26/2006 8:13:47 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/26/2006 8:16:33 AM EDT by macman37]
I searched the last 24 hours for Hannity so if this is a dupe, TOUGH!

Last night Hannity and Colmes (Colmes was on vacation or something, someone else was in for him) had an ex-Iraqi General and advisor to Saddam Hussein on who wrote a book about his times in Iraq. Hannity and the other guy grilled him on WMDs and he admitted that Saddam had WMDs (chemicals) until (IIRC) late 2002 or early 2003, then when the US started building up our forces for the invasion, Saddam used a natural disaster in another country as an excuse to send the WMDs via 747 and truck convoy to Syria.

Link to video on Foxnews.com

I hope you find it as interesting as I did.

edit: link fixed
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 8:16:30 AM EDT
I saw it and I thought "well no shit". Only the moonbats think he never had them.
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 8:18:58 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/26/2006 8:19:47 AM EDT by The_Macallan]

Originally Posted By macman37:
I searched the last 24 hours for Hannity so if this is a dupe, TOUGH!

Last night Hannity and Colmes (Colmes was on vacation or something, someone else was in for him) had an ex-Iraqi General and advisor to Saddam Hussein on who wrote a book about his times in Iraq. Hannity and the other guy grilled him on WMDs and he admitted that Saddam had WMDs (chemicals) until (IIRC) late 2002 or early 2003, then when the US started building up our forces for the invasion, Saddam used a natural disaster in another country as an excuse to send the WMDs via 747 and truck convoy to Syria.

Link to video on Foxnews.com



La-la-la-la-la-I'm-not-listening-la-la-la-la...




Link Posted: 1/26/2006 9:18:56 AM EDT

Originally Posted By The_Macallan:

La-la-la-la-la-I'm-not-listening-la-la-la-la...

members.cox.net/themacallan/BushLied.jpg





Yeah, I know, even Hannity was wondering on the show whether anyone else in the MSM would pick this guy's story up.
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 9:24:51 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 9:30:20 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/26/2006 9:31:20 AM EDT by bull_8]

Originally Posted By The_Macallan:







Hey look everyone he's got more than the required 15 pieces of flair
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 9:38:53 AM EDT

Originally Posted By bull_8:

Originally Posted By The_Macallan:

members.cox.net/themacallan/BushLied.jpg





Hey look everyone he's got more than the required 15 pieces of flair



Link Posted: 1/26/2006 10:11:10 AM EDT
In September 2002, Ted Kennedy argued against invading Iraq BECAUSE Saddam had WMDs, and probably would use them to defend his regime. This speech of his I saw with my own eyes has evaporated, is never ever brought up or referenced.
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 10:17:47 AM EDT
Some VERRRRRRY interesting followup... This seems to be growing legs in the blogosphere and I, for one, am happy to see it.

I would love to see the liberals eating a big fat plate of crow.
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 12:23:31 PM EDT
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 12:25:20 PM EDT
its on right now on his radio show
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 4:49:35 PM EDT

Originally Posted By raven:
In September 2002, Ted Kennedy argued against invading Iraq BECAUSE Saddam had WMDs, and probably would use them to defend his regime. This speech of his I saw with my own eyes has evaporated, is never ever brought up or referenced.



That's what Winston Smith did for a living. He who controls the past controls the future; he who controls the present controls the past.
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 5:28:00 PM EDT
How long before someone asks:

Who is Winston Smith?

I bet those that don't know can kick my ass on the ole XBox
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 5:55:35 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Grunteled:
I saw it and I thought "well no shit". Only the moonbats think he never had them.



I remember seeing part of a BBC report or a documentary about the damage the chemical weapons Saddam used on the Kurds had done. The showed a picture of a woman who survived and her face looked like it was sloffed off. They think he used Mustard Gas (Blister Agent?) and VX. The woman lost her child and husband in the attack.

Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:06:54 PM EDT

Originally Posted By rjroberts:

Originally Posted By raven:
In September 2002, Ted Kennedy argued against invading Iraq BECAUSE Saddam had WMDs, and probably would use them to defend his regime. This speech of his I saw with my own eyes has evaporated, is never ever brought up or referenced.


That's what Winston Smith did for a living. He who controls the past controls the future; he who controls the present controls the past.


Also - the media don't try to control what people think, they just control what people think about.

Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:11:52 PM EDT

Originally Posted By The_Macallan:

Originally Posted By rjroberts:

Originally Posted By raven:
In September 2002, Ted Kennedy argued against invading Iraq BECAUSE Saddam had WMDs, and probably would use them to defend his regime. This speech of his I saw with my own eyes has evaporated, is never ever brought up or referenced.


That's what Winston Smith did for a living. He who controls the past controls the future; he who controls the present controls the past.


Also - the media don't try to control what people think, they just control what people think about.





You cant say media anymore, thats old speak, media is now known as right-think
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:14:05 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Rocketman:
How long before someone asks:

Who is Winston Smith?

I bet those that don't know can kick my ass on the ole XBox



Im almost 30, i have never played a XBox, and how much do you owe me ?
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:21:53 PM EDT

Originally Posted By raven:
In September 2002, Ted Kennedy argued against invading Iraq BECAUSE Saddam had WMDs, and probably would use them to defend his regime. This speech of his I saw with my own eyes has evaporated, is never ever brought up or referenced.



"Indeed, in launching a war against Iraq now, the United States may precipitate the very threat that we are intent on preventing -- weapons of mass destruction in the hands of terrorists. If Saddam's regime and his very survival are threatened, then his view of his interests may be profoundly altered: He may decide he has nothing to lose by using weapons of mass destruction himself or by sharing them with terrorists.
.
.
.
If Saddam's regime and survival are threatened, he will have nothing to lose, and may use everything at his disposal.
.
.
.
If weapons of mass destruction land on Israeli soil, killing innocent civilians, the experts I have consulted believe Israel will retaliate, and possibly with nuclear weapons.
.
.
.
Nor can we rule out the possibility that Saddam would assault American forces with chemical or biological weapons. Despite advances in protecting our troops, we do not yet have the capability to safeguard all of them."
~ Sen. Ted Kennedy,
D-MA, September 27, 2002.

The entire speech is here



Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:24:27 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Rocketman:
How long before someone asks:

Who is Winston Smith?

I bet those that don't know can kick my ass on the ole XBox


Winston was... *door breaks in* "WTF are you doing?" "Thought criminal, remain silent." "Ninteen eighty f-" *gagged* *Sounds of intense clubbing*


Oh, and I can still kick your ass at XBox, and I don't even own an X-box.
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:25:54 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Tanam:

Originally Posted By Rocketman:
How long before someone asks:

Who is Winston Smith?

I bet those that don't know can kick my ass on the ole XBox



Im almost 30, i have never played a XBox, and how much do you owe me ?




Now adays his job description at a media outlet would be say, editor.
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:36:03 PM EDT
Son....of.....a......bitch.

Holy cow...someone needs to follow up on this revelation. Man....
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:50:16 PM EDT
Seen it. That Iraq General pretty well answered where the WMD's are didn't he. Checked the book out but it is like 25 bucks. I can wait for the price to drop.
Link Posted: 1/26/2006 6:52:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/26/2006 6:52:48 PM EDT by The_Macallan]

Originally Posted By NAKED-GUNMAN:
Son....of.....a......bitch.

Holy cow...someone needs to follow up on this revelation. Man....


Don't worry - they are.

I'm sure the MoveOn Moonbats and DNC are already working up their talking points to smear his credibility.

Link Posted: 1/27/2006 7:39:34 AM EDT

Originally Posted By copenhagen:
Seen it. That Iraq General pretty well answered where the WMD's are didn't he. Checked the book out but it is like 25 bucks. I can wait for the price to drop.



I'm probably going to shell out whatever it costs. If nothing else I'd like to see this book on the bestseller charts.
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 7:45:13 AM EDT
you guys know the proof may still be available, right? after the war we accumulated so much documentation it would stretch 4 miles if the boxes were put end to end. we've managed to translate about 1/1000000th of it. we lack full time translators who understand iraqi arabic and have the scientific know-how to put this shit together...
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 7:47:34 AM EDT
I gave this a listen last night on the radio and all I could think was this will go nowhere simply because people don't want Bush to be right.
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 7:53:49 AM EDT

Originally Posted By hardcorps1775:
you guys know the proof may still be available, right? after the war we accumulated so much documentation it would stretch 4 miles if the boxes were put end to end. we've managed to translate about 1/1000000th of it. we lack full time translators who understand iraqi arabic and have the scientific know-how to put this shit together...



Of course. And recently (as in, earlier this week) there were some documents that bubbled up that connect Saddam to WMD programs as late as 2000. But this is a human, that can be interviewed, who was the second in command in Iraq's air force. And he says there were WMDs in Iraq until just before the US led coalition invaded.

But since this is all contrary to what the MSM thinks, this guy is going to be dropped.

I just searched CNN.com, CBSnews.com and MSNBC.com for "Georges Sada" and I got ONE link... To a story from when he was still in Iraq. The MSM - outside Fox News - is utterly and completely ignoring this guy.

If it weren't for the blogosphere, this would tragically fall flat because it doesn't fit into the liberal's worldview.
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 7:58:17 AM EDT
What i don't understand is why the Bush administration doesn't get all over this & make a point to show this to the world. I just don't get it.
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 8:06:25 AM EDT
All of the other intelligent networks around the world claimed that he had WMD’s also. The press ignored all of those reports and told as Bush lied! They will ignore this too. Bush lied and Clinton never did that’s how the press sees’s it. Now, which one was convicted of perjury? Perjury is that something to do with lying?
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 8:07:44 AM EDT

Originally Posted By The_Macallan:

Originally Posted By NAKED-GUNMAN:
Son....of.....a......bitch.

Holy cow...someone needs to follow up on this revelation. Man....


Don't worry - they are.

I'm sure the MoveOn Moonbats and DNC are already working up their talking points to smear his credibility.




I'll make a prediction here.

If the media has to say something abou this, the media discrediting will take a form similar to this:

Since the guy is a leader in the Presbyterian church in Iraq, he is a member of the religious-right-wing-conspiracy and cannot be trusted.
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 8:11:07 AM EDT
More Bush administration propaganda, I wouldn’t be surprised if this puppet was on the CIA payroll
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 8:15:17 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Hylton:
More Bush administration propaganda, I wouldn’t be surprised if this puppet was on the CIA payroll

Link Posted: 1/27/2006 8:18:38 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Hylton:
More Bush administration propaganda, I wouldn’t be surprised if this puppet was on the CIA payroll



But that pathetic, bullshit video you hold so highly is real factual evidence, right? That ain't propaganda right? I'm sure you're starbucks drinking self knows much more than that General?
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 8:21:34 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 8:27:41 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Hylton:
img52.imageshack.us/img52/1236/sheep5fb.gif



You should look only into the mirror to see a sheep that blindly follows print media.
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 8:41:43 AM EDT
I believe this guy, I remember the convoys going into Syria before the war; however, why is this guy just now saying this? He could have broke this a long time ago, and saved a lot of headache.
Link Posted: 1/27/2006 11:03:04 AM EDT

Originally Posted By ryann:
I believe this guy, I remember the convoys going into Syria before the war; however, why is this guy just now saying this? He could have broke this a long time ago, and saved a lot of headache.



I'm sure the timing may have something to do with the book he's published and is now promoting!
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 12:39:34 PM EDT
Bump... Georges Sada was on MSNBC yesterday but nobody (that I've found so far) is really putting any weight behind his claims.
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 1:32:23 PM EDT
The 20+ tons of nerve agent that Al-queda tried to deploy in Jordan in the spring of 2004 were forgotten in two days. I think Fox is trying to help the administration but the administration wants the fact that dozens of tons of chemical and biological weapons are "out in the open" to go away as they continue to try and track them. The libtards scream that we went into Iraq too soon and the tragety is we failed to go in soon enough.
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 1:46:28 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/30/2006 1:47:35 PM EDT by Slug-O]

Originally Posted By Sylvan:
Causus Belli right there.
LEFT FACE!
FORWARD MARCH.

For the Marines

Yeft, hace
howyard yarch



LMMFAO!!!!!!!

Slug-O/0352
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 3:11:58 PM EDT

Originally Posted By WyattEarp:
What i don't understand is why the Bush administration doesn't get all over this & make a point to show this to the world. I just don't get it.



Yeah, I can't possibly think of any reason they wouldn't want another Ahmed Chalabi on their hands.
Top Top