User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:12:44 PM EDT
Why is it that two adults are not allowed to resolve an issue in the traditional fashion ? I propose dueling be legalized under the following conditions:
- Both people are legally adults - Their immediate families consent and cannot sue anybody for anything regardless of the outcome - The duel is performed in a controlled arena with proper safety barriers for spectators. - The participants have sufficient insurance in case of injury(some company would right it) or post a cash bond to cover medical bills in the event of injury. That's all I have so far, any other ideas to add on ? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:13:36 PM EDT
[#1]
oh HELL YEAH !!!
But you can't wear ridiculous clothes like the pic.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:14:55 PM EDT
[#2]
Yes, dueling with a special glock matchung dueling pistol set
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:15:32 PM EDT
[#3]
 You must be as tired as I am. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:16:14 PM EDT
[#4]
I'd take a 1911 thank you. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:16:21 PM EDT
[#5]
Any ya gotta have a pencil thin moustache and wear a ruffled shirt.
BTDT, don't believe it? Ask an old time ARFCOMMER. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:16:36 PM EDT
[#6]
Why woun't you want to dress up like an American colonist or some one from the 18th and 19th centuary?! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:16:40 PM EDT
[#7]
Why not bring back Gladiator Games - duel to the death!, while we are at it?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:18:35 PM EDT
[#8]
i propose that all disputes be settled in a barbed wire cage, with swords and axes
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:20:37 PM EDT
[#9]
yep, "2 men enter. 1 man leave" |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:20:46 PM EDT
[#10]
I could fix the title I guess, nah screw it 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:23:18 PM EDT
[#11]
That's the spirit. Keep the ideas coming guys!!!! I think dueling should be legal, and on Pay per view! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:23:53 PM EDT
[#12]
 I challenge you to a duel sir!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:24:07 PM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:26:39 PM EDT
[#14]
I don't have a problem with it. I would never participate (I prefer an unfair advantage, thanks), but I wouldn't dream of telling two consenting adults that they can't kill each other. Kill each other already! Like I give a shit.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:27:14 PM EDT
[#15]
I picked choice 3.
Bareknuckle boxing always worked when I was a teenager. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:29:33 PM EDT
[#16]
You slap him in the face with a glove. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:33:02 PM EDT
[#17]
My animation gif fu is weak, I work with what I got. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:34:45 PM EDT
[#18]
already have people in mind
Hey if 2 people want to go at it I say let them. Free country. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 8:37:21 PM EDT
[#19]
Just found this on Google, fess up, who is it ?
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:02:37 PM EDT
[#20]
The wording in the law is a bit odd, but I do believe Dueling is still legal in Idaho under very specific conditions. I doubt it has been used in ages though.
-Ben |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:05:58 PM EDT
[#21]
With a scoped single-shot TC? Nobody on arfcom, for sure. One guy would have a Glock, and the other a 1911. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:06:42 PM EDT
[#22]
Absolutely.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:09:05 PM EDT
[#23]
Banjos, no. Gangbangers, yes.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:10:03 PM EDT
[#24]
I dont think either of them have a TC. They look like some sort of fancy air gun??  
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:11:07 PM EDT
[#25]
Yup. As long as both agree to it (no shooting in the back and saying later that it was a duel) and I am not downrange of incoming fire, go for it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:11:58 PM EDT
[#26]
Muder should be legal But under very strict guidelines. If two or more people want each other dead, they would both sign an affidavit expalining why. They must agree that they are willing to risk their own lives to kill the other person. The killing must be done with no assistance from other people. There must be a time limit. The affiants would have to show proof of financial responsibilty for any dependants or debt left behind if they are killed. The affidavit would be reviewed. If it meets the guidlelines, a murder permit good for 30 days would be issued. Then they can try to kill each other in any way they can.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:12:45 PM EDT
[#27]
What are the rules for dueling? I dont know why two adults shouldt be able to try and kill each other. If they are both willing? It seems like a natural animal right.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:17:51 PM EDT
[#28]
Make it interesting, only bladed weapons are legal for dueling.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:23:43 PM EDT
[#29]
Our national parks are seriously underutilized. I say that dueling should take the form of a 24-hour time limit stalk.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:26:24 PM EDT
[#30]
Sure are national parks need fertilizer. How about a cordoned and contained free-fire zone in bad neighborhoods? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 9:35:26 PM EDT
[#31]
that worked back in the day, but nowadays you gotta worry about people coming back with guns wanting to finish the fight. Once you engage in combat consider the person an enemy for life till a truce is made. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 10:27:34 PM EDT
[#32]
Now walk 5,000 steps, turn around and shoot. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 10:48:40 PM EDT
[#33]
I was thinking it would be fun to have matched deuling paintball guns. one CO2 cartridge, one shot. This would be as close as possible to the classic deul without being deadly. Obviously not the same, but I think it would be fun for settling disputes at drunken parties. Loser leaves the party with a nice pink welt.
On of the things I think of when I'm bored. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2006 10:57:42 PM EDT
[#34]
That's an absolutely awesome idea. Now all we need is pay per view and it's a moneymaker as well! I would love to have the opportunity to slap another man in the face and challenge him to a duel. Also, the winner takes the loser's money and gets to bang his wife. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/11/2006 12:13:06 AM EDT
[#35]
"The only part of the conduct of any one, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign." John Stuart Mill (1806–1873). On Liberty. 1869.
Consent is the underlying core of morality. Not self-denial. GL |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/11/2006 12:27:06 AM EDT
[#36]
Yes, anything to get more stupid people to kill themselves off is a good thing in my book.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
