Quoted:How is it a direct match? The Lux output is less than half. Did you see the test I posted? I know they use Luxeon LEDs, I said that in the post. Nuwai has a Type 2 instead of harder type 3 anodize, plastic instead of pyrex lens and crappy regulation that put you at 50% output quicker. It is also not as waterproof as a Surefire.
There is no grey area here. If you want the extra features you pay the extra cash.
Xenon will be around for a long time yet. LEDs are great and I carry 2 of them in my rotation of lights. no matter the Lux output they don;t throw nearly as well and tend to get drowned out by ambient light.
|
Yes, I read both tests. The problem is that I am comparing the 3 watt Nuwai to a 60 lumen G2, and you are comparing the 3 watt Nuwai to the 5 watt L4. Big difference. If you want to compare 5 watt flashlights, that's cool but you're talkng apples and oranges.
Anodizing doesn't meant a whole lot. It's only as scratch resistant as the metal underneat when it's only a few thousandths thick, and yes, I am in a machine trade, and yes, I have dealt with anodizing companies. Bottom line is that if you ding aluminum it doens't matter what you coat it with. I've seen a lot of scratched up and loved Surefires in people's back pockets, so it's not like their covered in kryptonite.
As posted in my original thread, I agree that you pay for features. That doesn't mean other alternatives are junk. For crying out loud, it's a flashlight (!), not a 'torch', not an 'illumination tool'. I guess the marketing works?!?