Delay's statements sound to me like an attempt to jab his fellow Republicans into fiscal reality. I don't really think that Delay thinks there is nothing more to be cut from the budget, but rather that everyone and his brother up there has their own pet spending item that they are holding on to with all their might. The result of all this you-scratch-my-back stuff is spending that is almost as bad as the dims.
It could also be a shot at the media who is fond of turning any proposal to cut anything into a story about the mean old Republicans trying to take something from somebody that they need to survive. Perhaps Mr. Delay was being very cunning and was hoping to get a few dum-dum reporters to look over spending items and see some of the rediculous crap that the .gov is spending money on, and then go with their cameras and demand that it get cut.
Wouldn't that be a nice change? The media ADVOCATING cuts to spending and poor Congresspersons being forced to cut the fat out of the budget?
Some of you folks need to stop drinking the tinfoil crowd's kool-aid. Wherever there is a power structure, there will be politics surrounding the aquisition and exercise of that power. Why? Because lots of people want it. Thus to succeed, someone has to know how to play the game.
It sounds to me like Mr. Delay might just be making a pretty good and extremely entertaining move in that game. He knows the left despises him and will instantly adopt the opposite position of him on anything, and will paint themselves into a corner. He also knows he can use that to his advantage to introduce some sobriety into federal spending and perhaps to remind his Republican colleagues of their obligations.
If Delay proposes a reduction in spending, it is immediately branded cuts that hurt children and the elderly and the little guy. But when libs propose cuts to the EXACT same stuff, they are being "fiscally responsible". When your enemy is so stupid that he will do exactly what you want him to given a slight push, you take advantage of that.