Quoted: This is where the wheels completely come off the pro-homosexual marriage argument.  It doesn't matter if it is being made by the most flaming gayboy or by libertarians.  If you allow it then you HAVE NO ARGUEMENT against any other manifistation of "marriage" that one can imagine.  Simply stated, the destruction of the traditional man + woman marriage contract will destroy this country as we know it.

Doubt it, although it seems most of the debate stems around the specific word "marriage."  I think the main reason gay people want marriage bills passed is so they can have the same benefits married men and women do.  There's no secret conspiracy out to get you and turn you gay . . .

ETA: That's pretty much saying that the people who want the legalization of marijuana have no arguement against legalizing all drugs, except they do.  Contrary to conservative opinion, people won't be marrying their dogs and goldfish if two people of the same sex can marry.

Quoted: ETA: That's pretty much saying that the people who want the legalization of marijuana have no arguement against legalizing all drugs, except they do.  Contrary to conservative opinion, people won't be marrying their dogs and goldfish if two people of the same sex can marry.

If marriage is not limited to a contract between a man and a woman then why not polyamy?  Why not your brother or sister?  It's a serious question.  What is the argument?  If you support homosexual marriage then you have none because the EXACT SAME arguments can be used in these cases too.  This is not "conservative opinion".....it's a fact born out of logic.

Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Still awaiting the Terminator to veto.  My best guess is that he will do so. Didn't the Kalifornia voters pass a prop to define marrage in 2004? Yes we did and Arnold want's to let the voters decide.  Even supporters of ghey marrage are saying the socialist democRats are ramming this through against public opinion. Poor choice of words.  Funny, though.

Our style of politics, would you like to try some

Quoted: Quoted: ETA: That's pretty much saying that the people who want the legalization of marijuana have no arguement against legalizing all drugs, except they do.  Contrary to conservative opinion, people won't be marrying their dogs and goldfish if two people of the same sex can marry. If marriage is not limited to a contract between a man and a woman then why not polyamy?  Why not your brother or sister?  It's a serious question.  What is the argument?  If you support homosexual marriage then you have none because the EXACT SAME arguments can be used in these cases too.  This is not "conservative opinion".....it's a fact born out of logic.

Well that might be true if logic had ANYTHING to do with the laws passed in this country.


Here is a really good example.......

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So I can  buy a brand new HK MP-5.. right......I can carry anything ARM I want in all 50 states....right


Hell that isn't just a law...it's the U.S. Constitution

He's announced he is going to veto it.

NTM

Quoted: He's announced he is going to veto it. NTM

Maybe he's finding his Conan cojones.
Good.
A small step for heterosexuality.
A giant step for mankind.

Yep on the veto...!

And it's not already?????