Quoted:
Quoted: Well, technically they were operating a motor vehicle, and they did hit someone else's car. Only difference from normal instances is speed/source of power, neither of which really matters DUI/DWI cases. Does the fact that they were using (wo)manpower as opposed to gasoline, and going 5 mph instead of 50 really matter? They were still twice the legal limit and they still caused damage to another vehicle.
As far as I know, there are no provisions in DUI/DWI laws that say "operating a motor vehicle while drunk is legal under [insert speed here]" or "operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol shall not be considered illegal if the car is propelled by [insert power source here]"...
Would you prefer they got off scot free?
|
Get off scott free for pushing a disabled car? While DRUNK? Perish the thought. The law should always be applied blindly and without the use of reason or what the troglodytes call "common sense." To do otherwise would be doubleplus ungood.
|
So if two drunk ladies ruined your car one night, you wouldn't want them to be criminally liable for destruction of (your) property?
FACT: These women were twice the legal limit.
FACT: They were operating a motor vehicle, albeit at a slow rate of speed and via an alternative power source, but the vehicle WAS moving and it wasn't the easter bunny that was moving it. Like I said, there is no legal clause that says the vehicle must be running on gasoline power (if you were coasting down a steep hill with the car off and in neutral, doing 40 mph, that counts as DUI 110%) or that it must be going a certain speed (if you're doing 4 mph in a 65 mph zone while drunk, that is 110% DUI) to qualify for DUI status. THEY (yes, they, since there was presumably more than one person pushing) WERE IN OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE. WHILE DRUNK. PERIOD.
FACT: They caused damage to another person's property as a DIRECT RESULT of operating a motor vehicle and being over twice as drunk as one may be allowed to do so.
FLAL1A's LALALAND LOGIC: The women should get off scot free. They did nothing illegal, and *we* all need a dose of "common sense".
Well...whatever floats your boat, I guess