Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 7/13/2001 11:01:10 AM EDT
I use 1024x768.Just curious.
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 11:04:47 AM EDT
[#1]
1024 x 768, 'cause if I go higher my eyes are too old!
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 11:10:37 AM EDT
[#2]
1024x768
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 11:16:34 AM EDT
[#3]
1280x1024 on a 19" Sony.
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 11:16:43 AM EDT
[#4]
1024 x 768 x 24 bit color.

I also try to configure as fast a refresh rate as the monitor allows.  85 to 90 Hz looks as solid as a photograph.
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 11:17:38 AM EDT
[#5]
1024x768
32 bit color
Currently with a "Jurassic Park 3" theme,and a very realistic 5.56mm rifle cartridge as my cursor.
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 11:19:58 AM EDT
[#6]
1152 X 864 on a 19 in. monitor...
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 11:23:27 AM EDT
[#7]
1024 by 768 on my 15. Only gets 65hz at the res.

Nomad - how did you get the 5.56 cursor?
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 12:01:58 PM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 12:18:43 PM EDT
[#9]
Refresh rate is the number of time the screen is re-drawn. For computer monitors anything over 70hz is desirable. Going lower than that will cause the screen to flicker.

Usually if you select a refresh out of range it will garble the display. I've never heard of it damaging the monitor, at least in a Windows OS.

A standard 15-17" monitor will usually run at 75hz at 1024x768.
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 12:31:46 PM EDT
[#10]
I use 1024 X 768 32 bit color. On a 17" mon. running a Riva TNT II AGP card. [rolleyes]

St. Louis Bob
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 12:47:11 PM EDT
[#11]
1280x1024 16 bit
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 12:47:41 PM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 1:00:33 PM EDT
[#13]
Just so you know I've burned up a monitor once when using refresh too high for my monitor.  Course this was under Windows 3.1 (didn't have option to revert back if display was garbled like Windows 95/98 has automatically).

Took probably 1-2 minutes of nervous key stroke and mouse clicks trying to change resolution back while looking at a garbled screen, before the monitor started to make a funny noise and then shrunk to a white pinpoint at the center of the screen.  Failed to turn on after that.


YMMV,
Steven L.
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 1:07:20 PM EDT
[#14]
1024 x 768 like pretty much everybody else
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 1:07:45 PM EDT
[#15]
1280x1024 on a 21" Viewsonic  32bit colors

Link Posted: 7/13/2001 1:19:09 PM EDT
[#16]
1152x864 on a ViewSonic 17"
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 1:24:47 PM EDT
[#17]
800X600  You guy must have better eyes than I do.  I use 1024X768  in some gaming situations but not when I plan on reading alot of text.

17 inch monitor.
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 1:49:21 PM EDT
[#18]
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 4:09:40 PM EDT
[#19]
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 4:19:30 PM EDT
[#20]
1024 x 768 on my 19" monitor, 800 x 600 on the 17" Server monitor.

Tyler
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 4:21:25 PM EDT
[#21]
1024 x 768 16bit 75hz 17" Gateway (Crystal Scan)
Link Posted: 7/13/2001 4:46:07 PM EDT
[#22]
What Lock&Load said on a 19" Viewsonic PF790 - man I wish I could afford a flatscreen...
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top