Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 6/12/2001 3:40:48 PM EDT
Which one is better to build? What are the good receivers to build them on? I am thinking of going 7.62, and I don't think you can build an M1A.
Link Posted: 6/12/2001 3:53:28 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/12/2001 3:58:27 PM EDT
[url]www.azexarms.com[/url]
Link Posted: 6/12/2001 4:01:29 PM EDT
I'd say FAL, all the way. Built mine for under $500 (including refinishing) and mags are REAL cheap if you look in the right places. I got 10 for $70 a couple months ago. Go to [url]www.gunsnammo.com[/url] They have kits for $120 and receivers for $210. You [b]CAN[/b] just throw it together after you get those two items, but uuuumm... that wouldnt be legal. [;)]
Link Posted: 6/12/2001 4:14:03 PM EDT
Ill go FAL also. I think they are nicer rifles and they are cheaper to boot. I think the HK's are too heavy and recoil too much.
Link Posted: 6/12/2001 4:17:50 PM EDT
The FAL is way easier. WAY easier. The HK barrel is pressed in place, requiring a press, and I seem to remember some welding involved. I have a buddy who built several, so it's not like it's impossible or anything. Just alot harder than a FAL. I've built ARs, FALs, M-14s, M1911A1s, and a few other types. FALs are about as easy a build as an AR. Parts are plentiful as well, and you can custommize it during the build easier because of all the different variations of pieces available. Ross
Link Posted: 6/12/2001 11:31:00 PM EDT
don't need to weld the hk if you buy a stamped steel reciever (aluminum is ugly but stiffer) with the cocking tube welded at the factory. hk is da 'chit! [heavy]
Top Top