What happened to Balzac72? - Page 2

General » General Discussion

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - What happened to Balzac72? (Page 2 of 2)

Posted: 10/1/2004 6:17:33 PM EDT

[#1]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Another Quality MEMBER GONE!

Yes I miss Imbro also.

Yeah me too

Posted: 10/1/2004 6:19:00 PM EDT

[#2]

Quoted:
respect

Thats good

Posted: 10/1/2004 6:21:05 PM EDT

[#3]

Quoted:
photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?iImageUnq=30429

Come on over twinkle toes, our CoC allows me to not be banned for calling a spade a spade.

Posted: 10/1/2004 6:32:08 PM EDT

[#4]

Balzac broke a ton of rules and kept getting warnings and then he kept breaking rules to the point wehere it was an "in-your-face" to the site staff. I was hugely on Balzac's side when he was first banned because I pretty much agree with his mindset toward Islam, which is what he was "officially" banned for, but once I found out the history behind all this, I decided the site staff's biggest mistake was not banning him sooner, over something less inflammatory and emotionally charged than the beheadings. They had PLENTY of opportunity.

Posted: 10/1/2004 7:02:55 PM EDT

[#5]

Quoted:
Come on over twinkle toes, our CoC allows me to not be banned for calling a spade a spade.

You can call a spade a spade here too PD,you just can not call for the killing of all "spades" because some/many/a lot/whatever.............. are our enemies.

If you want to call for the killing of every Iraqi, because of the terrorists assholes we are fighting in Iraq,you should think of all the children killed a couple of days ago during the opening of the water plant in Iraq.

For every one of ours the terrorists have killed,they have also killed 15 of their own since the war started.Yes,it might come to a surprise to you,but those children were muslim also and i am sure not colaborating with the terrorists or they wouldn't have been there!
There are some,possibly many iraqis,Afghans,etc (I don't profess to know) who want peace and want to be our allies...which we can probably use some day in our fight with the murdering extremists in Islam.

You might not care if 30 of them die, and only care if any of ours die.But we need native allies whereever we go.Without them,insurgent wars CANNOT be won and I WANT US TO WIN,more than I want to kill everyone who is NOT a terrorist or a terrorist colaborator.

Get this through your thick skull my friend: While it might make you feel great,(balzac and a number of the guys at pre-ban too) to proclaim your hatred and death-wish towards ALL muslims, it does not prevent a single one of our soldiers from getting killed by the terrorists or insurgents.Getting and keeping as many of them on our side -as in Iraq's government and general population -MIGHT save us some lives over there.

If I can save one life -ours or innocent children in Iraq-by getting the non-terrorist muslims on OUR side,I would STFU and contain my hatred for them (if I had any) ,even if it made me burst.

Remind yourself how we captured Hussein (human intelligence from an informant in exchange of $25M),and ask yourself how are we more likely to capture Bin laden and his murderous hordes.Through "friendly" informants or hostile natives?
Apparently money is not a big enough incentive to turn them in,or we would have them all in captivity.

"Killing" everyone might make some of you happy,but it won't win the war and bring our military back and out of harms way.Getting/keeping the non-extremists on our side,on the other hand,might get us the leaders and their followers so we can kill them for their murderous cowardly acts,as they deserve.

Call a spade a spade if you want ,but don't call all cards from the same deck spades.........because they are not.

Posted: 10/1/2004 7:06:52 PM EDT

[#6]

heh...
Ed you never cease to amaze me with your posts.
are you a chess player?

Posted: 10/1/2004 7:09:41 PM EDT

[#7]

Quoted:
heh...
Ed you never cease to amaze me with your posts.
are you a chess player?

Used to be.

Am I in "check"?

Posted: 10/1/2004 7:13:01 PM EDT

[#8]

Quoted:
Quoted:
heh...
Ed you never cease to amaze me with your posts.
are you a chess player?

Used to be.

Am I in "check"?

Quite the contrary...you have a very good understanding of strategy.

Posted: 10/1/2004 10:05:00 PM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
Quoted:
heh...
Ed you never cease to amaze me with your posts.
are you a chess player?

Used to be.

Oh my goodness.....Ed I had no idea....NOW I know to bring the chessboard to the next NY Gathering....

Posted: 10/1/2004 10:10:29 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Another Quality MEMBER GONE!

Yes I miss Imbro also.

Yeah me too

UGH. I dont.

Posted: 10/1/2004 10:11:17 PM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:
Balzac broke a ton of rules and kept getting warnings and then he kept breaking rules to the point wehere it was an "in-your-face" to the site staff. I was hugely on Balzac's side when he was first banned because I pretty much agree with his mindset toward Islam, which is what he was "officially" banned for, but once I found out the history behind all this, I decided the site staff's biggest mistake was not banning him sooner, over something less inflammatory and emotionally charged than the beheadings. They had PLENTY of opportunity.

You're totally right. I liked Balzac too, but he kept pushing it even after several reprieves. Too bad.

Posted: 10/1/2004 10:13:26 PM EDT

[#12]

...Backspaced it out...

Posted: 10/2/2004 5:09:36 AM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Balzac broke a ton of rules and kept getting warnings and then he kept breaking rules to the point wehere it was an "in-your-face" to the site staff. I was hugely on Balzac's side when he was first banned because I pretty much agree with his mindset toward Islam, which is what he was "officially" banned for, but once I found out the history behind all this, I decided the site staff's biggest mistake was not banning him sooner, over something less inflammatory and emotionally charged than the beheadings. They had PLENTY of opportunity.

You're totally right. I liked Balzac too, but he kept pushing it even after several reprieves. Too bad.

Will he be allowed back eventually tho..? I mean hell Imbrog got let back and even McUzi..

Posted: 10/2/2004 5:11:53 AM EDT

[#14]

Quoted:
I have to tell you the Free Balzac72 is probably a little counter-productive. Ever stop to think that staff might be inclined to let him back some day, but certainly would not want to send the message that you can break the rules repeatedly and if people bitch enough you can get a pass... All the while other people bitch about two sets of standards... those for the rank and file and those who get preferential treatment because of a position they hold or people they know.

Posted: 10/2/2004 5:19:42 AM EDT

[#15]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Balzac broke a ton of rules and kept getting warnings and then he kept breaking rules to the point wehere it was an "in-your-face" to the site staff. I was hugely on Balzac's side when he was first banned because I pretty much agree with his mindset toward Islam, which is what he was "officially" banned for, but once I found out the history behind all this, I decided the site staff's biggest mistake was not banning him sooner, over something less inflammatory and emotionally charged than the beheadings. They had PLENTY of opportunity.

You're totally right. I liked Balzac too, but he kept pushing it even after several reprieves. Too bad.

Will he be allowed back eventually tho..? I mean hell Imbrog got let back and even McUzi..

Free Imbroglio!… Free Balzac72!

Posted: 10/2/2004 6:21:24 AM EDT

[#16]

The owner of a home has every right to make whatever rules he sees fit as to the type of person he allows in his home. If he doesn't want to allow smokers into it he is within his rights. If he chooses to allow some smokers but not others he is still within his rights.

I am constantly amazed so many think they have a right to say whatever they want on this forum or any other for that matter. It's simply a fact that nobody has a right to infringe upon the rights of the site owner to determine what kind of views are expressed on his site. His right to determine what is posted supersedes any perceived rights the poster may think he has.

Posted: 10/2/2004 6:31:35 AM EDT

[#17]

^

Posted: 10/2/2004 6:34:00 AM EDT

[#18]

Buy one, get one free!

Posted: 10/2/2004 7:20:46 AM EDT

[#19]

Quoted:
^

img.photobucket.com/albums/v133/macandy/AOBN.jpg

Maybe. Or maybe having run 6 game servers at times sustaining over 3Mb/s bandwidth along with multiple forums paid for with my time and money, I can appreciate to a small extent the desire of an owner to determine exactly what takes place on his servers.

Posted: 10/2/2004 1:41:38 PM EDT

[#20]

Quoted:
Free Imbroglio!… Free Balzac72!

Free women and free beer too!

Posted: 10/2/2004 2:16:28 PM EDT

[#21]

Quoted:
Quoted:

Free women and free beer too!

Now thats a thought!

Yes… Free Women! Free Beer! Woohoo!

ANdy

Posted: 10/13/2004 4:54:29 PM EDT

[#22]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Thanks for the IMs showing me Balzacs AIM IM. Thanks again. It's what i needed. I forgot about that IM List thread. So... anyone know a lot about 30-30 lever action rifles? I just passed a hunting course and I'm looking for suggestions to get one with side ejection so i can mount a scope on it. Marlin, Winchester any good kind. Thanks. Do they come in camo? I like Advantage.

P.S. Sorry for posting this here but I wanted to know quick rather than wait a week for a response in the Hometown.
Marlin

For NYS deer - .35Cal Marlin! Use 200Grain Rem Soft (Round) or CoreLokt points.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - What happened to Balzac72? (Page 2 of 2)

General » General Discussion

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us