Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 5:27:17 AM EDT
[#1]

Yep
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 5:31:15 AM EDT
[#2]
I used to have issues with MM until I met the guy in person. After I met him, I realized that he's genuinely a good guy -- a bit on the cantankerous side, but WTF... I expect to be by the time I get to his age too... but he's one guy I'd not toss out of my trench in a fire fight... that's for sure.

He's a bit old school with some things and I suppose that the cultures eventually clashed. So he bailed.

Balzac72 and LivefreeordieNH are both good guys as well. Balzac72 can be hotheaded and lash out, but that doesn't change the fact that he's still one of the good guys.

After thinking about it for the past couple of days, I realize that it's more a problem with how the software of this site is set up. Hard to imagine that software affects interpersonal interactions, but that's exactly the case.

Instead of outright banning people, on my sites I've programmed a 'trusted' status where if a member is causing problems, they can be unchecked from trusted status. Then their posts go into a moderation queue where a mod can review them for approval to the site (or not). The eventually agree to behave or their posts just never show up and they leave on their own accord. None of this 'account suspended banning'.

IMHO -- being raised as a kid in a rigid, fundamentalist religious cult, the whole banning/shunning thing really reeks of cultishness sometimes.
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 5:58:02 AM EDT
[#3]
Just couldn't resist!!


Ah, Ben, didn't know you cared!!   Really, thanks for the kind words.  I didn't care for you much in the beginning either but after a time and then meeting you, I learned the error in my thinking.

My first impression of TBK1 seems to be more accurate!

Garandman and I have our differences but I always tried very hard to either treat him fairly - or ignore him.  Our private communications are just that and I will keep them that way.  It has always offened me when Mods/Staff used their power to promoe their own agenda (even if it was one I agreed with).  Don't think I ever did, at least hope not.


I too am saddend by all this.  I spend a lot of time here and put a lot of thought and effort into it.  I have also taken many things too seriously and allowed it to eat at me.  I have made a few enemies (some well deserved) and a lot of friends.  We have sparred, discussed, learned, maybe shed a tear or two in the privacy of the computer room.  None of it, except the dumb things I have said, would I ever change.  
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:01:19 AM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:


Garandman and I have our differences but I always tried very hard to either treat him fairly - or ignore him.  Our private communications are just that and I will keep them that way.  It has always offened me when Mods/Staff used their power to promoe their own agenda (even if it was one I agreed with).  Don't think I ever did, at least hope not.



Its all good.



Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:05:24 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:

Quoted:


Garandman and I have our differences but I always tried very hard to either treat him fairly - or ignore him.  Our private communications are just that and I will keep them that way.  It has always offened me when Mods/Staff used their power to promoe their own agenda (even if it was one I agreed with).  Don't think I ever did, at least hope not.



Its all good.







Yup....now, you wanta fuck my sister??


Sgtar15
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:09:28 AM EDT
[#6]
See now THAT's the shit that makes this place all good.

MickyMouse, I know that you probably aren't in a place where you can accept this, and that I understand.

But I believe that TBK1 is a good guy whose heart is in the right place. I've spent enough time talking to him on the phone over the past couple of years, meeting up with him and Honeybee, and I am a pretty good judge of character. I've enjoyed the interactions and times we've had. Mike is loyal to a fault, and probably gets overly zealous about an idea when he believes in it. He's a really passionate guy about certain things, and that's what can make him both annoying at times, but trustworthy at the same time. You know where he's at, and he can be counted on like a stopwatch. I don't think those are 'bad' characteristics, just ones that need to be understood within a context. Hell, that can be said about all of us...

I know that there have been differences, but I hate to see two people at odds who I know personally, and think good of both.

My $.02
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:12:06 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:


Yup....now, you wanta fuck my sister??


Sgtar15



The very thought that you have siblings scares me.

DEFINITE turn off.







Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:21:38 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:


Yup....now, you wanta fuck my sister??


Sgtar15



The very thought that you have siblings scares me.

DEFINITE turn off.










Some here might not feel that way...Got Pics?

BigDozer66
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:23:17 AM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:23:22 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:

Quoted:


Yup....now, you wanta fuck my sister??


Sgtar15



The very thought that you have siblings scares me.

DEFINITE turn off.











3 brothers and 6 sisters.


Catholic birth control...........keep them preggers.

Sgtar15
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:39:50 AM EDT
[#11]

Some days this place makes me sad.


Everything makes you sad: The state of the nation, the state of the Republican Party, George Bush, Neocons, party funds with strings attached, the softness of your toilet tissued...

It sounds like less of an AR15 problem, and more of a personality issue.
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:45:39 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:


I am sorry you feel it is morally wrong to enforce a rule that no discrimination,incitement to genocide,......It just happens to be the rules we have, and so you could have made the right decision.....based on your own "ethics of fairplay"

Good luck to you, and thank you for your past involvement in the site.



+1 on above. 'Bout time the calls for genocide were addressed here.

+1 on the "best wishes" to Mickey Mouse.



Link Posted: 9/23/2004 6:53:01 AM EDT
[#13]
Ed, you are correct in that I never read that post of yours, which I assume was in a restricted area such as the mod forum, after I decided to leave  Of course, I no longer can access those areas..



Quoted:
Mike,
I won't say you have interpreted everything wrong.But i will say: most of it is wrong.

You have not been on any freezeout.You can ask any staff member/mod how often I contact them.Most of my contact is in the GD Staff.................which you rarely frequent.

I phoned you when you first went to the hospital.Got the Hospital phone number from CavVet,but he forgot to give me your room number and the operator could not find it.later I got sidetracked with other issues and before I knew you were out.I found out you were fine,and that's what mattered to me.
My own mother has been in the hospital in FL.She has been through 3 hurricanes and I have no been able to reach her either. Gee,in the past 2 years I have been hospitalized/operated on twice.Once for a torn triceps and last year for a knee I destroyed.I did not perceive the lack of phone calls as a "dislike" by anyone! Why do you?
There has been no veiled or overt anything, UNTIL NOW.But if the shoe fits,then I guess you should wear it.

The recent post on the mods forum about ETHICS was in part precipitated by your comments on pre-ban.Nothing veiled.You know you were one of the staff members involved in the criticism,so you knew it pertained to you.NO SECRET THERE.

You referred to your inquiry (some time back) about my "unhappiness with you".I never answered why I was "unhappy with you "because I was NOT unhappy with you,any more or any less than with anybody else!

WTF can I say when you imagine things and want me to fit into your assumptions and delusions?

I am sorry you feel it is morally wrong to enforce a rule that no discrimination,incitement to genocide,porn,nudity,etc.It just happens to be the rules we have, and so you could have made the right decision.....based on your own "ethics of fairplay"

Good luck to you, and thank you for your past involvement in the site.





Some of YOUR assumptions are quite mistaken also!  I read EVERY new post in Staff and most in the GD mod forum nearly EVERY DAY.  I most often did not post for two reasons:

One - it did not involve me or had been appropriatelyt dealt with. So no comment from me was in order.
Two - I was uninterested in the snide smart ass remarks certain to come from TBK1 unless I was in 110% agreement with him.

As for your comments in Mod regarding the discussion on PreBan, I complied with your clear request and resigned as Staff.  You may post those too, if you wish.

If you think my decision was based soley on a disagreement over the "kill them all" controversy, you are less in tune with either me or the site than I thought.

Comments other than in response to yours above have been e-mailed to both you and Juan; please let me know if you fail to receive them.

I wish you the best as well and hope to see you at BF next year.
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 7:01:36 AM EDT
[#14]
Here ya go Ben........this should cheer ya right up!!

Link Posted: 9/23/2004 7:02:04 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
To others who have stood with us:THANK YOU!.To those who trash us in pre-ban,THANK YOU ALSO!It is always good to know who your true friends are,and who "denies you" in the face of the slightest disagreement.



Mr. Avila, I'm new here, and I've never even been to pre-ban, so I don't know the extent of the trashing being done there, but I have a small (okay, maybe not-so-small) comment to make about this.  As someone who has been through this kind of drama on a few other boards, I'm wondering if the bitching going on "behind your back" on pre-ban is just typical of growing pains more than a sign of some deeper disloyalty to AR-15.com or its members.  From my few years of reading over my husband's shoulder here at Arfcom, it seems as if people feel a very real connection to this place, almost like it's a safe haven from all the crazy anti-freedom liberals out there.  And as things evolve and change, there are sure to be people who feel as if their safe place is threatened, and they will likely lash out.  But that's good for Arfcom, I think -- it keeps it honest, and reminds people of the site's "roots," so to speak.

Anyway, what all this girly psychoabble is getting at is that I think you and the rest of the Site Staff are doing a great job, but I also think a certain amount of discontent is normal and healthy for the site, so long as the people in charge respond to criticisms constructively.  

I'm curious, though -- when someone's account is suspended for violating CoC in the heat of the moment, do they get a refund on their team membership?  I know, I know, they broke the rules . . . but if it's in the heat of a thread like the beheading thread or the Russian schoolkids thread . . . I don't know, it just seems unfair that they paid to support the site and then lose their posting privileges for getting emotional over VERY emotional topics.

Okay, I'm done rambling now.  I was nervous to post this because you're the Big Guy in Charge and all, and I'm just a newbie (and a girl at that), but I felt like I needed to say it.

Thank you for all you do -- this site has been a haven for my husband for a few years now, and now I'm as addicted as he is.

But I still think you guys should free Balzac72.  
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 7:09:17 AM EDT
[#16]
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 7:22:51 AM EDT
[#17]
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 7:31:41 AM EDT
[#18]
Ed, I do not need to ask CavVet - I disagree with you on some things but I know you are not a liar.

The dirty laundry thing seems to have upset you the most.  It is one of those areas upon which we disagree.  When a strong undercurrent of dissent exists and it does not get addressed, sometimes strong medicine is in order to try to deal with it.  Not all of those attempts are pleasant nor are they always successful but continuing to hide them is not always the answer either.  There were mistakes  made on BOTH sides in the Balzac incident but the one that tore it for me was not the content of his post (or my agreemnet / disagreement with it) but the overly harsh reaction by a Staff member who admitted he was lying in wait for him.


I will resend the e-mails.  Please forgive me if it happens to double!
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 7:32:27 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:

6 sisters.


Catholic birth control...........keep them preggers.

Sgtar15



No wonder you play with dolls!
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 7:44:18 AM EDT
[#20]
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 7:49:42 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:
From my few years of reading over my husband's shoulder here at Arfcom, it seems as if people feel a very real connection to this place, almost like it's a safe haven from all the crazy anti-freedom liberals out there.  And as things evolve and change, there are sure to be people who feel as if their safe place is threatened, and they will likely lash out.  But that's good for Arfcom, I think -- it keeps it honest, and reminds people of the site's "roots," so to speak.

.............. but I also think a certain amount of discontent is normal and healthy for the site, so long as the people in charge respond to criticisms constructively.  

 


Thank you for your comments and advice.

This should be a safe heaven for all of us.The problem is that when some violate the rules action needs to be taken,or the safe heaven can be taken away form us all.The kind and "severity" of that action is what we cannot all agree on,so someone has to make a decision.

Criticism is good,but I hope you agree that going to another site to do it while you hold a position here, is not very constructive but very demoralizing to the rest of the team!




Agree 100%.  I wasn't referring so much to MickeyMouse as I was to guys like Balzac72 -- whom I have no idea if he has ever trashed Arfcom on another board, since I havent visited any other gun boards.  If someone holds a position here, that person should absolutely be held to a higher standard and handle any criticism privately.  That's the kind of thing that makes any organization or team strong.

I just think that the general funk around here is a really normal reaction to most changes, whether they're on the internet or in real life.  It's how the funk is handled that is the true measure of the quality of leadership -- not the fact that the funk exists.

Again, I really do think you guys are doing a great job.  (And yes, I can be a total brown-noser when I feel like it -- I'm an HONEST brown-noser, though.  )
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 9:31:31 AM EDT
[#22]
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 9:35:56 AM EDT
[#23]
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 9:36:58 AM EDT
[#24]
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 11:34:03 AM EDT
[#25]
Why?  Did some guy here suggest you go have sushi for lunch with them?
Link Posted: 9/23/2004 11:41:19 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
Why?  Did some guy here suggest you go have sushi for lunch with them?



Please... live up to your name.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top