User Panel
Name them, and be prepared to prove it, or admit that you are full to overflowing with fermented pigshit. |
|
|
+1 The LP party has lost it's mind on too many issues. Now is not the time to open the borders and have unlimited imigration. Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas... |
|
|
That'd be why you aren't allowed to post here anymore, right? Being called on factual inaccuracies, fallacious argument, and pompous manipulative condescension is probably embarrassing, but it isn't a "shoutdown." |
|
|
I'm a Libertarian from WAAAY back (My Dad and Mom were students of Hospers in the early '70's) BUT, I've spent 14 yrs in the US Army on-and-off since '81 (I got "Strung-out" on Armor) and post 9-11, I find myself in agreement with the Rep's about five times as much as anything the Dem's offer.
The one ideal I hold most dear from my Libertarian up-bringing is the right of individuals to associate with those they wish to if both parties are agreeable. The Republicans don't always agree with THAT idea 100% but, the Dem's/Lib's agree with it at about 1/10th their (The rep's) acceptance level (They're too busy creating "Victims" out of personal choice decisions) so it's really a pretty easy call for me. |
|
DAYUM... I LIKE THAT!!! POMPOUS MANIPULATIVE CONDESCENSION!!!! DUDE!! YOU ROCK!! |
||
|
I don't think I'd feel welcome if people DIDN'T beat up on me.LOL
That's half the fun around here, kickin' each other about stuff all the time. |
|
+2 |
||
|
The party (any party) has to represent the greatest percentage of THREE HUNDRED MILLION (give or take three or four) people it can muster. If you expect to agree with every single item of the platform you are being idealistic to an insane degree. Those who decry the voting for the "lesser of two evils" are nitwits, and not worthy of being taken seriously, or being allowed to engage in conversation with adults. Simple--any vote will always be for whoever most closely represents one's views, and unless YOU are the candidate, will always be the "most close" or "lesser of two evils" or "greater of two goods." Perhaps you get the idea. |
|
|
What was the quote by Regan
Something about agreeing on 80% of the issues. |
|
Fuck 'em and feed 'em fish ! |
|
|
Well I'll never smoke weed with Willie again - glad the sarcasm got thru - Ive drank a Cola Wiessen here or there - I guess I dont look gay - or like the kinda guy you'd say it to I vote freedom and 9/11 - if the GOP betrays the Constitution, then I'll stand against them. As it is now, they are our best hope. May you live in interesting times. Luck Alac |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
I don't feel unwelcome. I try to get along by not picking on the Christians too much.
|
|
You're a lawyer, aren't you? That would explain why your only morality is victory. To a lawyer, the facts don't matter, logic doesn't matter, even common decency doesn't matter. Winning is the only thing that matters. Well, that and racking up as many billable hours as possible. It's no mystery to me why you identify yourself with a destructive force like the Huns. It makes perfect sense as far as I can tell. WWJD? |
|
|
|
||
|
Is it ok to be a winner on the not-so-bad team when the good team lost? Is it merely enough to have beaten the very bad guys, yet the best team lost? It all depends on how you define a victory. And the word "is". h.gifGranted, the "good-guys" will be differently defined by you and I, and YMMV. That said, its not like we are voting against Cuthulu here. |
|
|
Ahh... the "throw away my vote" excuse. Timeless and as long as it remains a good excuse, things will never change.
|
|
Until a better choice comes along, I'd figure I was winning if I managed to stay alive. Wishing for other choices when they don't exist is unrealistic. |
||
|
It depends on how severe. I have had surgery, been hit by a car, broken arms, scraped my knee until I could see my kneecap, etc etc etc.
If its a paralizing injury, I will take death, thanks. But not for another 80 years. |
|
Posting here is like real life. You have the right to make a statement. I can then use my right to make a statement about your statement. What don't you understand about that?
|
|
Yeah, get rid of that picture of that Clinton loving liberal. |
||
|
I usually don't feel unwelcome here. If I get crap from people I have purposely brought it upon myself. Also, both Bush and Kerry are twits and shouldn’t be president. The both are supporters of un-American ideals in which they wish to force on the nation. I vote for freedom and personal responsibility. I'm going to "waste" my vote and pick the guy that best represents my interests. Oh and by the way, I’m one of those “capital L” Libertarians, The less government the better.
|
|
A word of advice for MoparMike and mist.
The first thing I look at when I suspect that a poster is an agitator troll is the length of time that person has been registered. If it is Sept . 2, 2004 and I see that the suspect troll has only been registered since Sept. 2004, it's a pretty good damn bet that the poster has scaly, hairy skin and bad breath. I would venture to guess that most regulars on this site can rub two brain cells together and figure this out as well. In order to be a successful troll you have to try a little harder. It's too late for this kind of hokey shit to work for the 2004 election. Start planning for 2008. |
|
Passport:
Your boy Bubba Clinton probably gave them this idea:
UCMJ:
All this is right here: Libertarian Platform So next time you start spouting what is and what is not their platform, at least have a fucking clue about what you speak. Before you say someone else is ill-informed, get informed yourself. |
|||||
|
Jesus would tell you to stop whining. |
||
|
Welcome MoparMike, check out the Arkansas hometown forum. Introduce yourself. |
|
|
Ok, so you proved me wrong about the UCMJ. And that passport thing isnt a "We are going to ban it", its a statement of desire to return to a way of life that doesnt require you to be paranoid about who is coming in and out of the country. Its a little naive, and for the record I have never agreed with the open borders policy. But the quote you gave sounds more like "I hope to once again see a time where locking the doors isnt necessary, like it was years ago" etc etc. You will have to come up with a more sinister sounding quote or platform excerpt for me to concede that point. But good job in educating me on one point. I stand corrected, and you stand corrected about my belief that I agree with the abolishment of the UCMJ. I dont. |
|
|
Amen! Which is why I am a 100% royalist... I am all for monarchies... |
|
|
Gee, cincy, go back and re-read the post you quoted. That was me rebutting mopar mike. You were attributing some things that I was saying to him as things he was saying. |
||||||||||
|
I see that you can't admit when you are wrong. I also see that if you believe in the abolishment of the UCMJ, you are very ill-informed about military matters, thus not in a position to make a call on that particular matter. If you want to make the part about passports seem all rosey, go ahead, but it just shows that you can't accept the facts when they stare you in the face. |
||
|
uh, if I wanted to be popular I wouldn't pick this handle. Nor would I share my views regarding freedom. So, yeah, it's not all that welcoming here, but it's no worse than most other places, so what's the problem?
I'm more of a Boortz libertarian than a Badnarik type. But I'll still vote L, because I think that government growth is more disconcerting than suicide bombers. I support the war, but if the war comes as a package with prescription drug benefits, aids funding for Africa, education reform ($$$), and campaign finance reform, etc - then, I can't vote for the president. |
|
Damn you non proper quote-code users. Now I don't know who said what. Standby.... |
||||
|
ITS CALLED LITERACY! GET SOME! |
|||
|
Hey don't forget about the abolition of customs, you're also WRONG ABOUT THAT:
YOUR PARTY SAYS: "We call for the elimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol" Hint: That includes customs. I suggest you take the time to read your own platform, before you claim others are "ill-informed". |
||
|
No, my literacy is fine. You worded it as if you did agree with it. If I am wrong on that point, sorry, but the rest of it I stand by. |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
Don't sweat it, man. Different boards have different standards regarding what is considered to be proper. We are routinely accused of being "too uptight" and firm in our moderating. We TRY to strike a balance between a free-for-all and too rigid to make a good discussion. You're new, so give it a little time to get a feel for the board and its culture. We have a great bunch here! Oh--stay away from Ed's Beer Pit. |
|
|
Stay in the info forums and not GD.
Parties other than Republican have different views on firearm ownership. Libertarians not so much, but if you come here as a Democrat, you might wanna keep it a secret. I am a Lib, but know enough to vote for bush since my vote in my state may change the outcome... Otherwise, talk about guns in the other spots. |
|
"Congratulations on getting a poll going, but you are a pinko-communist Kerry-voter" is my choice. Sorry if I offended, but I was just choosing the best answer.
|
|
Why do you think you deserve a "modicum of respect"? You claim to be a "Libertarian", and have demonstrated that you don't have even the FAINTEST CLUE as to what is in their Platform. Perhaps if it is "respect" you wish, you should try to avoid looking SO ill-informed. You advocate a Platform which ANY THINKING PERSON CAN SEE is full of recipes for America's doom, AND YOU HAVEN'T EVEN BOTHERED TO READ IT (or worse, comprehend it). "The second someone trips... "?? You call not understanding the very BASIC tenets of your political beliefs a mere stumble? |
|
|
I know you did. My apologies for the misunderstanding. It was all the RED. I didn't know who to attribute it to. |
||||||
|
I don't consider myself unwelcome here. But I wouldn't say I'm 100% libertarian either. As much as it pisses so many people off around here, I'm between that and liberal. The biggest thing I don't like about the libertarian party is there border policy. Open borders could never work. Especially with the terrorist crap going on now. I do stay out of the Bush debates now because I think he is every bit as much scum as Kerry. I think I’m going to vote for him only because it’s a wasted vote on Nader, and of course the whole AWB issue.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.