Who is Imbroglio? - Page 2

General » General Discussion

Site Notices

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Who is Imbroglio? (Page 2 of 3)

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:00:31 PM EDT

[#1]

Quoted:
I never knew about that. This changes my view of him considerably.

You're serious?? It's been posted about MANY times. Our Moderator Paul was there.

Edited to add: In 10,000+ posts I've never heard of him offering ANY explanation--not even a lame one.

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:01:52 PM EDT

[#2]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
ANd lets not forget that whole video taping people license plates at an organized shoot with fellow members from the boards.

Sgatr15
let's forget it

people make mistakes - must their mistake follow them their whole life ???

I just made a mistake too, and I'm betting it won't follow me my whole life--I hit a wrong key and had to do an edit to fix it. Deliberately bringing a video camera to one of the first AR15.com shoots and hanging in the parking lot videotaping people's vehicles and license plates is not a "mistake" in my view--it's despicable and just plain creepy. I attend many AR15.com shoots, and if anyone does that while I am present they will watch their camcorder be used as our target, next to a bottle (or two) of Tannerite, and they may well be in for an ass kicking--and we will post about it FOREVER. Some "mistakes" just aren't made.

point taken

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:02:34 PM EDT

[#3]

an asshole.....I'm only in the 100's and I know that. Jeesh...

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:04:25 PM EDT

[#4]

Seriously, I missed that one. Honest injun.

I never once knew that he videotaped people at a shoot like that. I don't read every cottonpicking thread on here.

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:05:13 PM EDT

[#5]

<Personal attack removed.>

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:16:23 PM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:
He had a different point of view

A lot here can not stand that sort of thing

to bad , I say.

He is back under a different user name - different IP provider ......... we stay in touch

OK OK I admit it, I'm Imbroglio. You got me.

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:17:58 PM EDT

[#7]

Quoted:
<Personal attack removed.>

Where the fuck were you yesterday when JClark had about 4 personal attacks against me in a row while Site Staff participated in the thread?

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:19:28 PM EDT

[#8]

Quoted:
Quoted:
<Personal attack removed.>

Where the fuck were you yesterday when JClark had about 4 personal attacks against me in a row while Site Staff participated in the thread?

Laughing uproariously?

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:21:26 PM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
Quoted:
<Personal attack removed.>

Where the fuck were you yesterday when JClark had about 4 personal attacks against me in a row while Site Staff participated in the thread?

He was running for the rope

Lynch mob rules

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:22:49 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:

Site ~~curmudgeon~~ hemorrhoid.

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:23:05 PM EDT

[#11]

ANdy

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:24:27 PM EDT

[#12]

Quoted:
Lynch mob rules

If that was true you would be gone long ago.

And probably me also.

SGatr15

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:51:13 PM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:
Quoted:
<Personal attack removed.>

Where the fuck were you yesterday when JClark had about 4 personal attacks against me in a row while Site Staff participated in the thread?

I can't fix what I'm not aware of happening. Got a link?

{Oh, I also refuse to take responsibility for the actions--or in this case, lack of actions--by others, at least by your accusation.)

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:55:31 PM EDT

[#14]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
<Personal attack removed.>

Where the fuck were you yesterday when JClark had about 4 personal attacks against me in a row while Site Staff participated in the thread?

I can't fix what I'm not aware of happening. Got a link?

{Oh, I also refuse to take responsibility for the actions--or in this case, lack of actions--by others, at least by your accusation.)

This is bullshit. There were no personal attacks. I merely called him a troll for lying about the GWB abortion rumor. There was no personal attack whatsoever.

Look at page 9 of the GWB Abortion Thread:

I stopped on page 10 per DoubleFeeds request....but it was still not an attack.

Edited : Tried to add link but didn't work.

Posted: 8/20/2004 1:55:38 PM EDT

[#15]

Quoted:
Quoted:
<Personal attack removed.>

Where the fuck were you yesterday when JClark had about 4 personal attacks against me in a row while Site Staff participated in the thread?

He IMd me and asked me why it was that I asked HIM to stop attacking you while permitting you to troll up the site to your hearts content.
Please - don't push your luck.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:02:50 PM EDT

[#16]

Quoted:
This is bullshit. There were no personal attacks. I merely called him a troll for lying about the GWB abortion rumor. There was no personal attack whatsoever.

Look at page 9 of the GWB Abortion Thread:

I stopped on page 10 per DoubleFeeds request....but it was still not an attack.

Edited : Tried to add link but didn't work.

I read page 9 and part of page 10. You're right--there is bullshit afoot. Here are your posts:

Quoted:

This is straight out of Moby's playbook. BenDover, you are a fucking troll. Go to hell, motherfucker!

Quoted:

Quoted: JClark, please stop.

OK, I will. This is my last post to this motherfucker.

But, you all need to be aware that this is a standard ploy organized by the left for them to register on conservative oriented websites and lie about about an abortion that never occurred. This has been talked about extensively on talk radio. Hannity has even quoted Moby as endorsing this strategy.

BenDover, Go fuck yourself, punk!

If that doesn't constitute a personal attack, what would it take to become one?? This is very similar to what I removed from the post by BenDover. It is unacceptable on this site (outside of the Bear Pit)--and I'm deeply disappointed it was not only allowed, but almost condoned by Mods and Staff. I didn't read the whole thread, but there is nothing that could have been posted by BenDover that warranted this. Attack ideas, not the poster. If the first eight pages were like the 9th and 10th, then the thread should have been locked much sooner, or sent to the Pit (preferable). Attack away in the Pit--but NOT in GD.

BenDover, you are correct, the attacks on you were not right, and should have been shut down much sooner--but that certainly does not justify your post in this thread. You, of all people, having served for so long as a GD Mod, should know better.

Edit for board code.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:11:48 PM EDT

[#17]

How is posting an article of 'opposing view' (as spurious as it was) trolling? Let's count the number of articles that get posted here under the same intent (spurious ones as well) with the intention of creating a heated debate... abortion, christianity, politics, 9mm vs. .45, .223 vs. 7.62...

But because I'm the asshat fuckwad liberalloving DU DUDUDUDUDUDU socialist fuckhead (oh geeze, the names are so many at this point), I am not allowed? Nor am I allowed to defend myself?

I feel like TomJefferson's kid.

Let's not forget WHO it was who was responsible for unseating a couple of the largest snakes on this site, for the better of the whole community.

Then again... WTF does it matter...

Even ETH cannot deny that he has in his possession a signed affidavit that I sent on behalf of a total stranger, several thousand miles away to refute the claims that a certain AROCK was falsely making against TRG. How many of you ball-less wonders would sign your name on a legal affidavit and send it off to total strangers with nothing at stake in the entire game except that a guy can keep his job.

Fuck me running. What a low class dickweed fuckstain asswipe ball licker transvestite drug using shit gargling cumstain I am.

It's okay, I saw what a lot of you guys were made of a while back.

I've got more balls in my sack than half of you all combined.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:14:28 PM EDT

[#18]

Quoted:
How is posting an article of 'opposing view' (as spurious as it was) trolling? Let's count the number of articles that get posted here under the same intent (spurious ones as well) with the intention of creating a heated debate... abortion, christianity, politics, 9mm vs. .45, .223 vs. 7.62...

But because I'm the asshat fuckwad liberalloving DU DUDUDUDUDUDU socialist fuckhead (oh geeze, the names are so many at this point), I am not allowed? Nor am I allowed to defend myself?

I feel like TomJefferson's kid.

Let's not forget WHO it was who was responsible for unseating a couple of the largest snakes on this site, for the better of the whole community.

Then again... WTF does it matter...

Even ETH cannot deny that he has in his possession a signed affidavit that I sent on behalf of a total stranger, several thousand miles away to refute the claims that a certain AROCK was falsely making against TRG. How many of you ball-less wonders would sign your name on a legal affidavit and send it off to total strangers with nothing at stake in the entire game except that a guy can keep his job.

Fuck me running. What a low class dickweed fuckstain asswipe ball licker transvestite drug using shit gargling cumstain I am.

It's okay, I saw what a lot of you guys were made of a while back.

I've got more balls in my sack than half of you all combined.

Um, I was agreeing with you, if this was aimed at me. Can I call you? Or my # is incoming via IM.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:17:45 PM EDT

[#19]

Quoted:
Even ETH cannot deny that he has in his possession a signed affidavit that I sent on behalf of a total stranger, several thousand miles away to refute the claims that a certain AROCK was falsely making against TRG. How many of you ball-less wonders would sign your name on a legal affidavit and send it off to total strangers with nothing at stake in the entire game except that a guy can keep his job.

Yeah, you got right on that, didn't you?

Fuck me running. What a low class dickweed fuckstain asswipe ball licker transvestite drug using shit gargling cumstain I am.

It's okay, I saw what a lot of you guys were made of a while back.

I've got more balls in my sack than half of you all combined.

You should be more specific in your attacks.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:22:53 PM EDT

[#20]

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:24:21 PM EDT

[#21]

Do I detect some bitterness in that post Ben_Dover ???

Let it go ------------------- in the end you will feel better.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:24:48 PM EDT

[#22]

Quoted:

He was a independent thinker with a insightful perspective on the world.

Yeah, he sure could cut and paste with the damnest of them. Straight up cut and paste time and time and time again. Ask him to actually defend his badmouthing of the President or the military in his own words and he would disapear off into a xombie posting. He would bring crap here from Du, Salon and the like but never defend it. That got pretty tiring about the first 10,000 times he did it. I would pick a phrase and do a google search and find the orignal location of the lifting. If he had actually done a legal quote and attributed the "independant" and "insightful" attack on the members of my military I might actually have backed off but he would never quote nor attribute.

An independent thinker and an insightful perspective my hairy white ass!

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:26:46 PM EDT

[#23]

Quoted:
Don't know him, but sounds like he was run out of here because the prevailing voice is hard right....

I have no clue of what this is about so I'll blame it on the vast white wing conspiracy

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:29:26 PM EDT

[#24]

Quoted:
He was unique and not an arfcom sheeple...he posted what he thought and didn't care what other arfcomers thought of him. He was one of the ones who can think for themselves.

Bullshit. Find one of his "thoughts" and do a web search for some unique phrase and I'll bet you'll find it - at least I did every time I did (Save xombie postings

). He cut and pasted so much shit and would never ever once defend a single piece of shit that he flung here.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:29:28 PM EDT

[#25]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Don't know him, but sounds like he was run out of here because the prevailing voice is hard right....

Your critisism of our site aside, he was removed several times for trolling.

I am not criticising the site, (but if I felt it needed it, I'd be bold enough to dish it out come what may) and don't know the guy. It appeared from previous responses they just disagreed with him....

I think the problem people had with him was that he would troll in way too many spots. You couldn't post a thread for awhile where he didn't pop up and start trolling. The thread would be "Best optic for the M4" and Imbrogolio would pop up and talk about how Bush was trying to take your optics away. I don't mind different points of view, but he just trolled way too much.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:31:35 PM EDT

[#26]

who is imbroglio? someone who most here hate yet at the same time they can't stop talking about him. go figure.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:33:02 PM EDT

[#27]

Quoted:
Quoted:
I never knew about that. This changes my view of him considerably.

You're serious?? It's been posted about MANY times. Our Moderator Paul was there.

Edited to add: In 10,000+ posts I've never heard of him offering ANY explanation--not even a lame one.

I never knew that either

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:36:50 PM EDT

[#28]

Quoted:
ANd lets not forget that whole video taping people license plates at an organized shoot with fellow members from the boards.

Sgatr15

Twice that I know of - he was caught by the Californian crew taking notes of license plates too.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:38:49 PM EDT

[#29]

Quoted:
You're serious?? It's been posted about MANY times. Our Moderator Paul was there.

I wasn't there, I was up in Washington State during this event but the other's in our crew were there, and here, and told me about it. I would trust them with my life.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:47:21 PM EDT

[#30]

He sure did fit his user name thu

im·bro·glio P Pronunciation Key (m-brly)
n. pl. im·bro·glios
A difficult or intricate situation; an entanglement.
A confused or complicated disagreement.
A confused heap; a tangle.

since he would copy paste then later on disagree with it then rinse watch repeat.

Posted: 8/20/2004 3:52:59 PM EDT

[#31]

Quoted:
who is imbroglio? someone who most here hate yet at the same time they can't stop talking about him. go figure.

Much in the same way people comment on how shit stinks while in the latrine...!

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:05:07 PM EDT

[#32]

Quoted:
Quoted:
This is bullshit. There were no personal attacks. I merely called him a troll for lying about the GWB abortion rumor. There was no personal attack whatsoever.

Look at page 9 of the GWB Abortion Thread:

I stopped on page 10 per DoubleFeeds request....but it was still not an attack.

Edited : Tried to add link but didn't work.

I read page 9 and part of page 10. You're right--there is bullshit afoot. Here are your posts:

Quoted:

This is straight out of Moby's playbook. BenDover, you are a fucking troll. Go to hell, motherfucker!

Quoted:

This is straight out of Moby's playbook. BenDover, you are a fucking troll. Go to hell, motherfucker!

Quoted:

This is straight out of Moby's playbook. BenDover, you are a fucking troll. Go to hell, motherfucker!

Quoted:

This is straight out of Moby's playbook. BenDover, you are a fucking troll. Go to hell, motherfucker!

Quoted:

Quoted: JClark, please stop.

OK, I will. This is my last post to this motherfucker.

But, you all need to be aware that this is a standard ploy organized by the left for them to register on conservative oriented websites and lie about about an abortion that never occurred. This has been talked about extensively on talk radio. Hannity has even quoted Moby as endorsing this strategy.

BenDover, Go fuck yourself, punk!

If that doesn't constitute a personal attack, what would it take to become one?? This is very similar to what I removed from the post by BenDover. It is unacceptable on this site (outside of the Bear Pit)--and I'm deeply disappointed it was not only allowed, but almost condoned by Mods and Staff. I didn't read the whole thread, but there is nothing that could have been posted by BenDover that warranted this. Attack ideas, not the poster. If the first eight pages were like the 9th and 10th, then the thread should have been locked much sooner, or sent to the Pit (preferable). Attack away in the Pit--but NOT in GD.

BenDover, you are correct, the attacks on you were not right, and should have been shut down much sooner--but that certainly does not justify your post in this thread. You, of all people, having served for so long as a GD Mod, should know better.

Edit for board code.

Sorrt to disappoint you and I am also sorry that this site implicity condones his behavior in that GWB Secret Abortion thread. I think I will only lurk from now on rather than call it like I see it.

Very disappointing.

Respectfully,

JC

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:05:34 PM EDT

[#33]

he is a federal agent in my local office...

oops

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:09:38 PM EDT

[#34]

Yeah, he was a real deep thinker who was booted just becuase he didn't always agree with us sheeple on ARF.

www.indystar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74603&page=7&pp=15
Imbroglio Guest Posts: n/a

Re: Indianapolis police officers shot

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My condolensces to the officer's family.

Cop-killing bullet hoses that are designed to be spray-fired from the hip need to be banned in Indiana.

These machineguns can be used with deadly precision and provide street marauders with more thrust per squeeze than the average hunting gun.

I do support the second amendment right to hunting, and I dont think we should take away a hunter's duck shotgun that can hold 1 or 2 bullets.

But no law abiding person needs a high caliber rifle with a 50 bullet clip. It's just ridiculous to argue that someone would need one.

After we get rid of all the assault guns, then we can do something about the handguns and revolvers that are killing Indiana's children every day.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:11:23 PM EDT

[#35]

Sorrt to disappoint you and I am also sorry that this site implicity condones his behavior in that GWB Secret Abortion thread. I think I will only lurk from now on rather than call it like I see it.

Very disappointing.

Respectfully,

JC

Translation : I did not get my way and will go pout now ... boo hoo.

You violated the rules -- I am glad you are going to only lurk - if you can not follow them and show others who do not think as you any respect.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:13:44 PM EDT

[#36]

Quoted:

Sorrt to disappoint you and I am also sorry that this site implicity condones his behavior in that GWB Secret Abortion thread. I think I will only lurk from now on rather than call it like I see it.

Very disappointing.

Respectfully,

JC

Translation : I did not get my way and will go pout now ... boo hoo.

You violated the rules -- I am glad you are going to only lurk - if you can not follow them and show others who do not think as you any respect.

Whatever. Enjoy attacking me. I care.

Good bye.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:24:03 PM EDT

[#37]

Quoted:
Sorrt to disappoint you and I am also sorry that this site implicity condones his behavior in that GWB Secret Abortion thread. I think I will only lurk from now on rather than call it like I see it.

Very disappointing.

Respectfully,

JC

You didn't disappoint me--please reread my post. I was disappointed the attacks (not just by you) were allowed to continue. You are fairly new, and made a mistake--no biggee--just a learning experience. If it was serious, you would have heard about it privately. Certainly you've heard of the ominous "IM Incoming" from Staff, right?? Again, no biggee--enjoy the site, just keep it between the lines.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:28:17 PM EDT

[#38]

Quoted:
Quoted:

Sorrt to disappoint you and I am also sorry that this site implicity condones his behavior in that GWB Secret Abortion thread. I think I will only lurk from now on rather than call it like I see it.

Very disappointing.

Respectfully,

JC

Translation : I did not get my way and will go pout now ... boo hoo.

You violated the rules -- I am glad you are going to only lurk - if you can not follow them and show others who do not think as you any respect.

Whatever. Enjoy attacking me. I care.

Good bye.

This is straight out of Moby's playbook. Ben_Dover you are a fucking troll. Go to hell, motherfucker!

The above is an attack --- I used your words not mine (as an example)

what I said was an opinion.

Goodbye.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:30:51 PM EDT

[#39]

I honestly feel sorry for you, Cyanide.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:32:38 PM EDT

[#40]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Sorrt to disappoint you and I am also sorry that this site implicity condones his behavior in that GWB Secret Abortion thread. I think I will only lurk from now on rather than call it like I see it.

Very disappointing.

Respectfully,

JC

You didn't disappoint me--please reread my post. I was disappointed the attacks (not just by you) were allowed to continue. You are fairly new, and made a mistake--no biggee--just a learning experience. If it was serious, you would have heard about it privately. Certainly you've heard of the ominous "IM Incoming" from Staff, right?? Again, no biggee--enjoy the site, just keep it between the lines.

Thanks for the reply. I do appreciate it. I still think I'd rather not post further for the time being as the GWB Secret Abortion thread was over the top and it pissed me off that it was condoned. That is why I went vigilante....sorry.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:32:42 PM EDT

[#41]

ITs interesting a member known for stirring up arguments can still do it without even posting.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:33:28 PM EDT

[#42]

he was a troll.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:38:55 PM EDT

[#43]

Quoted:
I honestly feel sorry for you, Cyanide.

As I do for you --- anyone who feels he is better than the rules is a nazi wannabe.

Be good.

Goodbye #4

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:42:07 PM EDT

[#44]

Quoted:
Quoted:
I honestly feel sorry for you, Cyanide.

As I do for you --- anyone who feels he is better than the rules is a nazi wannabe.

Be good.

Then, we are in agreement. We both feel sorry for each other and we both think that each other are Nazi's.

At least we found some common ground, Cyanide.

Later.

P.S. You can say Goodbye till you're blue in the face. You don't control me, pal.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:42:27 PM EDT

[#45]

Come on you guys, please play nice.

Edit: Did you guys notice the yellow thingy at the bottom just changed to number 5 instead of 91?? Dunno what that means, but it must be good.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:44:53 PM EDT

[#46]

Quoted:
Come on you guys, please play nice.

Ok - I have made my point -- which was respect is a two way street.
JC I am not gonna beef with you - you seem a nice guy. I hope we can put this behind us.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:46:05 PM EDT

[#47]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Come on you guys, please play nice.

Ok - I have made my point -- which was respect is a two way street.
JC I am not gonna beef with you - you seem a nice guy. I hope we can put this behind us.

Cyanide, Consider it water under the bridge. IMO, the best grudge is the grudge not kept.

Posted: 8/20/2004 4:46:56 PM EDT

[#48]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Come on you guys, please play nice.

Ok - I have made my point -- which was respect is a two way street.
JC I am not gonna beef with you - you seem a nice guy. I hope we can put this behind us.

Cyanide, Consider it water under the bridge. IMO, the best grudge is the grudge not kept.

cool