User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 2:34:36 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Understand just because a person is a veteran, doesn't mean they believe in the second amendment. Military has always been anti gun for individuals, ask any guy living in the barracks. Truth I wish they taught the Constitution in all the boots... They don't but the troop swears to protect and uphold it... |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 2:34:47 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just another company doing what it takes to make money. I don't recall another company using Tabs, Scrolls or being an OGA rentacop as boner feetass for luvin Uhmerica and alcoholism. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 2:36:39 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Hannah Barron is a Chinese operative. Her country girl schtick is just an act, she was born, raised AND TRAINED in Beijing. I legitimately have no idea who this person is, but where does this information come from? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 2:40:11 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I legitimately have no idea who this person is, but where does this information come from? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Hannah Barron is a Chinese operative. Her country girl schtick is just an act, she was born, raised AND TRAINED in Beijing. I legitimately have no idea who this person is, but where does this information come from? Short, has funny accent. You do the math, bro. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 2:49:12 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I legitimately have no idea who this person is, but where does this information come from? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Hannah Barron is a Chinese operative. Her country girl schtick is just an act, she was born, raised AND TRAINED in Beijing. I legitimately have no idea who this person is, but where does this information come from? I am assuming it is a joke. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 3:04:49 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I am assuming it is a joke. Random IG Ho/Influencers bear zero importance to my life. ETA: NM… I got some sleep and realized what you meant. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 3:07:10 PM EDT
[#7]
You’re either a friend of ours or not.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 3:23:45 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Apparently, there's also a lawsuit being filed against them for securities fraud.  Fuck BRCC. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lawsuit-filed-against-black-rifle-235900301.html Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: how do you justify the Biden support and Kyle Rittenhouse condemnation? This is the issue, they have never in any way supported Biden or even made a comment suggesting they do. Go watch the CEO's podcast where he discusses the Rittenhouse thing, he never meant to condem him. But that takes time and listen to an explanation when many here would rather just write FBRCC and think they did something. How much is BRCC paying you? Probably not much. Seent their stock price lately? Fuck BRCC. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lawsuit-filed-against-black-rifle-235900301.html So they don’t just donate to democrats, they operate like them too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 3:52:35 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: YOUR choice in heroes is....not surprising. Who the fuck are you, troll? Did I SAY who my heroes were? I dislike Rittenhouse somewhat and more strongly dislike Mattis for various reasons but mostly this Now scurry back to the safety of the GD bandwagon, your head pats will be along shortly for standing up to mean ol' Alex_F. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 4:21:26 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Hannah Barron is a Chinese operative. Her country girl schtick is just an act, she was born, raised AND TRAINED in Beijing. If Hannah Barron is a Chinese operative, then teach me Mandarin, bro, I'm in. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 4:35:24 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They are conservative, there is a group here who has their panties in a bunch and love to hate things. You wouldn't believe how much they donate to pro-gun groups. People here take some idea and run with it, watch what they say and do and form your own opinion. They are good people. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I didn’t know that, TY. I listened to a recent podcast with a owner and he seemed very conservative so I was surprised to see all the negative comments in the other thread today. I believe he is also a former green beret. They are conservative, there is a group here who has their panties in a bunch and love to hate things. You wouldn't believe how much they donate to pro-gun groups. People here take some idea and run with it, watch what they say and do and form your own opinion. They are good people. L-O'fucking-L You must work at Brcc. FBRCC |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 4:51:08 PM EDT
[#12]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 7:38:26 PM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 8:24:53 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Who the fuck are you, troll? Did I SAY who my heroes were? I dislike Rittenhouse somewhat and more strongly dislike Mattis for various reasons but mostly this Now scurry back to the safety of the GD bandwagon, your head pats will be along shortly for standing up to mean ol' Alex_F. You should get coffee with Even sometime, the two of you would get along well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:07:21 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I’m not a fan of Evan, but I am a fan of JT and Mat. I’ve listened to their podcast back when it was drinkin’ bros. They’re super pro-2A from the podcasts episodes I’ve listened to. Even Evan is 2A. BUT big BUT here.I think Evan doesn’t want to ruin PR as a CEO of a billion dollar company and get cancelled. If Mat and JT ran it, they would be far more outspoken on 2A and helping out vets and not give a shit about what anyone says. I mean their T-shirt company ART-15 was pushing boundaries. Again, not a huge fan of Evan at all. Mat and JT are GTG in my opinion. You never hear anything about those guys being questioned on their stances or being a two face. But you can with Evan. It's noteworthy who people associate with . Matt and crew are funny but where the rubber hits the road they are not the guys I want to depend on to have my back. Even if just in a public forum. Kyle was gonna straight up gonna get merc'ed and brcc denounced him and anyone that took up his defense. F em |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:08:39 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There's nothing inherently wrong with being anti-Kyle Rittenhouse. Little shit is only slightly better than Mattis and it's pretty tiring seeing him constantly mentioned like he's some paragon of gun rights. As far as BRCC, one of their owners/etc said some anti gun shit and supported Democrats so they're dead to much of GD. *shrug* I mean besides being the cleanest case of self defense all caught on camera since the birth of the internet? Totally confused |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:10:51 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Nah, it's misplaced hero worship. Now it makes LOTS of sense. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/giphyggt-462.gif Kudos for the weirdest comparison I've read all year. Nah, it's misplaced hero worship. Now it makes LOTS of sense. Guy was literally about to get murdered on camera and defended him self with success. I mean judge why he should have been there but in the moment's where he dropped two mfers and crippled a third, he did aok in my book and by the juries Are you suggesting he didn't act in self defense? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:11:23 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I mean besides being the cleanest case of self defense all caught on camera since the birth of the internet? Totally confused Welcome to the club. I really don't get the Mattis connection. I guess I'd have to be there. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:24:07 PM EDT
[#19]
gaige grosskreutz testified under oath in open court on live tv that he chases Rittenhouse with a Glock pulled and didn't get shot till he pointed it at Rittenhouse's head.
I mean listen. If you can't stand up for clapping a Mfer aiming a gun at your head then I think we may just be too different to understand self defense. Anyone pointing a g27 at my melon is getting shot if it's within my means and you feel free to quote me on that stance Eta. It's on cam. Don't take my word for it @Alex_F Eta. It's three hours but worth the time  Kyle Rittenhouse trial: Gaige Grosskreutz testifies | FOX6 News Milwaukee Snippet https://youtu.be/zI3yrcLbQvc |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:42:32 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I mean besides being the cleanest case of self defense all caught on camera since the birth of the internet? Totally confused Maybe he's one of those ones who think Rittenhouse should have been at home in bed or something like that. He also fails to realize that the "hero worship" of Rittenhouse goes much deeper than Rittenhouse. It's not the man, but the situation. Rightfully defending yourself against shitbags and then finally the justice system gets it right.. that's what people cheer him for. Now, WTF that has to do with Mattis, LOL. Who the hell knows 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:46:47 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Maybe he's one of those ones who think Rittenhouse should have been at home in bed or something like that. He also fails to realize that the "hero worship" of Rittenhouse goes much deeper than Rittenhouse. It's not the man, but the situation. Rightfully defending yourself against shitbags and then finally the justice system gets it right.. that's what people cheer him for. Now, WTF that has to do with Mattis, LOL. Who the hell knows As a Father. If Rittenhouse was my kid I would have begged for him not to go. Please lord Jesus Christ don't go. Don't be involved. It's a bad move. But the second anyone tries to kill you then you kill them right back |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:48:34 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Truth I wish they taught the Constitution in all the boots... They don't but the troop swears to protect and uphold it... The constitution says nothing about gun rights. The constitution is literally a pathway for a monarchy or some form of monarchy imo. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:52:06 PM EDT
[#23]
 You try to kill'em right back |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:52:45 PM EDT
[#24]
They are to the 2A as Caesar's Palace Casino is to Rome.
Seems related, but it's paper thin |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:57:11 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The constitution says nothing about gun rights. The constitution is literally a pathway for a monarchy or some form of monarchy imo. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:58:45 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Maybe he's one of those ones who think Rittenhouse should have been at home in bed or something like that. He also fails to realize that the "hero worship" of Rittenhouse goes much deeper than Rittenhouse. It's not the man, but the situation. Rightfully defending yourself against shitbags and then finally the justice system gets it right.. that's what people cheer him for. Now, WTF that has to do with Mattis, LOL. Who the hell knows Honestly as a dad and asking my self if Rittenhouse regrets being there? Hell yeah he wishes he was at home. And he should have, as a father. But the second someone tries to kill you. Then do the mfing needful. Protect your life with every tool at your disposal. Would it have been better if he was home? Maybe. But he had every God given right to be there and ever right to protect him self |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:01:32 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The constitution says nothing about gun rights. The constitution is literally a pathway for a monarchy or some form of monarchy imo. Uh..  cocaine is a hell of a drug @Jinxsters Care to opine? A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/arms |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:04:43 PM EDT
[#28]
What part of the constitution grants the individual gun rights? Don’t use the BoR because that’s a separate document.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:06:02 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Uh..  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_4bp8bBNVw@Jinxsters Care to opine? A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: The constitution says nothing about gun rights. The constitution is literally a pathway for a monarchy or some form of monarchy imo. Uh.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_4bp8bBNVw@Jinxsters Care to opine? A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. @delemorte That’s the Bill of Rights. Not the constitution. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:07:22 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What part of the constitution grants the individual gun rights? Don’t use the BoR because that’s a separate document. So are you suggesting the bill of rights is not the first 10 amendments to the united states' constitution? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:07:25 PM EDT
[#31]
I wonder what kind of name "Hafer" is?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:08:06 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: @delemorte That’s the Bill of Rights. Not the constitution. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: The constitution says nothing about gun rights. The constitution is literally a pathway for a monarchy or some form of monarchy imo. Uh.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_4bp8bBNVw@Jinxsters Care to opine? A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. @delemorte That’s the Bill of Rights. Not the constitution. You get that the constitution has amendments and the first ten are the bill of rights? Start here my man. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/education/all_amendments_usconst.htm |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:13:43 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So are you suggesting the bill of rights is not the first 10 amendments to the united states' constitution? Bill of rights is a separate document from the constitution. Yes they’ve been ratified to coincide with each other but the anti federalist had to fight tooth and nail to get it ratified by the federalist. George Mason wrote both documents. He stopped writing the constitution when he saw how it could be corrupted by corrupt men. Read up on what the actual founding father who wrote both documents. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:15:19 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Bill of rights is a separate document from the constitution. Yes they’ve been ratified to coincide with each other but the anti federalist had to fight tooth and nail to get it ratified by the federalist. George Mason wrote both documents. He stopped writing the constitution when he saw how it could be corrupted by corrupt men. Read up on what the actual founding father who wrote both documents. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: So are you suggesting the bill of rights is not the first 10 amendments to the united states' constitution? Bill of rights is a separate document from the constitution. Yes they’ve been ratified to coincide with each other but the anti federalist had to fight tooth and nail to get it ratified by the federalist. George Mason wrote both documents. He stopped writing the constitution when he saw how it could be corrupted by corrupt men. Read up on what the actual founding father who wrote both documents. So your argument that even though the constitution wrote in a means to add amendments that utilizing that proces makes it invalid? I'm so confused Are you seriously as a member of this board arguing against the validity of the 2nd and 1st amendment? You might me the first person who I assume lives in this country arguing against the first ten amendments of the constitution |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:17:40 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So your argument that even though the constitution wrote in a means to add amendments that utilizing that proces makes it invalid? I'm so confused Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: So are you suggesting the bill of rights is not the first 10 amendments to the united states' constitution? Bill of rights is a separate document from the constitution. Yes they’ve been ratified to coincide with each other but the anti federalist had to fight tooth and nail to get it ratified by the federalist. George Mason wrote both documents. He stopped writing the constitution when he saw how it could be corrupted by corrupt men. Read up on what the actual founding father who wrote both documents. So your argument that even though the constitution wrote in a means to add amendments that utilizing that proces makes it invalid? I'm so confused Constitution is what government can do. Bill of rights is what the government can’t do to the individual. Constitution at the time literally had writing in it that considered certain people 3/5 of a person. Fuck that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:18:38 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Bill of rights is a separate document from the constitution. Yes they've been ratified to coincide with each other but the anti federalist had to fight tooth and nail to get it ratified by the federalist. George Mason wrote both documents. He stopped writing the constitution when he saw how it could be corrupted by corrupt men. Read up on what the actual founding father who wrote both documents. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: So are you suggesting the bill of rights is not the first 10 amendments to the united states' constitution? Bill of rights is a separate document from the constitution. Yes they've been ratified to coincide with each other but the anti federalist had to fight tooth and nail to get it ratified by the federalist. George Mason wrote both documents. He stopped writing the constitution when he saw how it could be corrupted by corrupt men. Read up on what the actual founding father who wrote both documents.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:19:26 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Constitution is what government can do. Bill of rights is what the government can’t do to the individual. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So are you suggesting the bill of rights is not the first 10 amendments to the united states' constitution? Bill of rights is a separate document from the constitution. Yes they’ve been ratified to coincide with each other but the anti federalist had to fight tooth and nail to get it ratified by the federalist. George Mason wrote both documents. He stopped writing the constitution when he saw how it could be corrupted by corrupt men. Read up on what the actual founding father who wrote both documents. So your argument that even though the constitution wrote in a means to add amendments that utilizing that proces makes it invalid? I'm so confused Constitution is what government can do. Bill of rights is what the government can’t do to the individual. You are not making any sense. Easy question. Is the right to bare arms a constutionally protected Right. If the constitution protects amendments how is the bor not protected |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:22:37 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You are not making any sense. Easy question. Is the right to bare arms a constutionally protected Right. By an amendment of the constitution, but it’s not direct constitutional right. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:24:09 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: By an amendment of the constitution, but it's not direct constitutional right. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You are not making any sense. Easy question. Is the right to bare arms a constutionally protected Right. By an amendment of the constitution, but it's not direct constitutional right. The definition you seek. it's in the document "amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution" Article 5 Amendments are like an appendix in our case, attached to the end of the document. Not a separate document. Lots of staples |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:24:10 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Constitution is what government can do. Bill of rights is what the government can’t do to the individual. Constitution at the time literally had writing in it that considered certain people 3/5 of a person. Fuck that. 3/5. You do realize that amendments dealt with that and it's now constutionally protected. Pretty sure it was the 14th. Is that no longer valid? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:24:13 PM EDT
[#41]
Can we please focus on If Hannah Barron is a Chinese spy??
Fuck. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:25:09 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: By an amendment of the constitution, but it’s not direct constitutional right. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You are not making any sense. Easy question. Is the right to bare arms a constutionally protected Right. By an amendment of the constitution, but it’s not direct constitutional right. Serious question. Are you retarded or just a troll I'm on the fence |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:25:16 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: @delemorte That’s the Bill of Rights. Not the constitution. its an Amendment!! Ask your attorney if an amendment to a contract is enforceable or not. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:26:04 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Can we please focus on If Hannah Barron is a Chinese spy?? Fuck. Hard yes allegedly |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:28:59 PM EDT
[#45]
How the hell did a overpriced coffee hate fest thread turn into a debate on whether the right to bear arms is in the constitution thread?
We need more research photos of this Chinese spy lady. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:29:02 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Serious question. Are you retarded or just a troll I'm on the fence Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: You are not making any sense. Easy question. Is the right to bare arms a constutionally protected Right. By an amendment of the constitution, but it’s not direct constitutional right. Serious question. Are you retarded or just a troll I'm on the fence Bitter |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:29:13 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Can we please focus on If Hannah Barron is a Chinese spy?? Fuck. Spy. Hands down |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:29:45 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How the hell did a overpriced coffee hate fest thread turn into a debate on whether the right to bear arms is in the constitution thread? We need more research photos of this Chinese spy lady. Retards. Obviously |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:30:35 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Bitter Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You are not making any sense. Easy question. Is the right to bare arms a constutionally protected Right. By an amendment of the constitution, but it’s not direct constitutional right. Serious question. Are you retarded or just a troll I'm on the fence Bitter Sure. Who's not but damn dude. Talk about a untenable position that makes that kid who smells bad seem smart. Dang |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:32:12 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How the hell did a overpriced coffee hate fest thread turn into a debate on whether the right to bear arms is in the constitution thread? We need more research photos of this Chinese spy lady. Brcc shills. F brcc |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
