User Panel
|
All white professors are ingraining supremacist attitudes and values even if unconsciously so all white professors male and female must be removed and replaced with black,yellow,red, & brown professors forthwith...
|
|
Remove their accreditation. They are no longer institutions of higher learning. No more taxpayer money for such BS institutions.
Just for starters, how can you teach the Humanities, if you have no clue what humanity is? |
|
Quoted: 88.75% of students at the university approved the change, campusreform.org reported. View Quote But I thought Gen-Z was gonna be our conservative saviors? |
|
|
Quoted: So you believe that Sandusky is not guilty? That the 50 or so men who have come forward so far are after the money, trailer-trash, liars, ..............? That Peterno, Curley, and company didn't know what he was and didn't attempt to sweep the whole thing under the rug? That the prosecution and jury got it wrong? @FS7 View Quote I think you need to understand more about the initial allegations and how they started - indeed, how specifically it was about money according to the first "victim" and his mother. Once the gravy train started, people came out of the woodwork with whatever they wanted and got paid. This system was publicly gamed by an individual making a deliberately false claim to illustrate how easy it was. I didn't change my mind all at once, but it started when I read that all of the supposed victims initially defended Sandusky, saying nothing had happened (in fact, they all spoke highly of him) UNTIL they had "repressed memories" recovered. I grew up during the moral panic of the 80s and it still fascinates me how physically impossible claims can imprison people. This case is not of the sort like flushing kids down toilets, but it does involve Sandusky essentially being a time traveler. If you want to understand more about how this happens, read about the McMartin trial or the Fells Acres trial. Those are significantly older and have more benefit of hindsight. But 10 years later this particular case certainly has unraveled. It's a long investment but I encourage listening. It's eye-opening. |
|
|
People here still think their kid is immune down to indoctrination and sends him or her off to these universities anyway.
|
|
"The senate also called for the term 'super seniors' to be axed. That refers to students who have taken longer than the usual four years to complete their studies, over fears the moniker could make some of them self-conscious".
"They" will now be referred to as "lazy fuckers, that shout go get a job" |
|
Quoted: I think you need to understand more about the initial allegations and how they started - indeed, how specifically it was about money according to the first "victim" and his mother. Once the gravy train started, people came out of the woodwork with whatever they wanted and got paid. This system was publicly gamed by an individual making a deliberately false claim to illustrate how easy it was. I didn't change my mind all at once, but it started when I read that all of the supposed victims initially defended Sandusky, saying nothing had happened (in fact, they all spoke highly of him) UNTIL they had "repressed memories" recovered. I grew up during the moral panic of the 80s and it still fascinates me how physically impossible claims can imprison people. This case is not of the sort like flushing kids down toilets, but it does involve Sandusky essentially being a time traveler. If you want to understand more about how this happens, read about the McMartin trial or the Fells Acres trial. Those are significantly older and have more benefit of hindsight. But 10 years later this particular case certainly has unraveled. It's a long investment but I encourage listening. It's eye-opening. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So you believe that Sandusky is not guilty? Guilty. That the 50 or so men who have come forward so far are after the money, trailer-trash, liars, ..............? A few yes, a majority, no. Going back 30/40 years to the 1970's. That Paterno, Curley, and company didn't know what he was and didn't attempt to sweep the whole thing under the rug? They knew, they did - two even admitted it at their trials and were found guilty. Third found guilty and trying to stay out of jail. One dead. That the prosecution and jury got it wrong? They did not. So you believe that Sandusky is not guilty? That the 50 or so men who have come forward so far are after the money, trailer-trash, liars, ..............? That Peterno, Curley, and company didn't know what he was and didn't attempt to sweep the whole thing under the rug? That the prosecution and jury got it wrong? @FS7 I think you need to understand more about the initial allegations and how they started - indeed, how specifically it was about money according to the first "victim" and his mother. Once the gravy train started, people came out of the woodwork with whatever they wanted and got paid. This system was publicly gamed by an individual making a deliberately false claim to illustrate how easy it was. I didn't change my mind all at once, but it started when I read that all of the supposed victims initially defended Sandusky, saying nothing had happened (in fact, they all spoke highly of him) UNTIL they had "repressed memories" recovered. I grew up during the moral panic of the 80s and it still fascinates me how physically impossible claims can imprison people. This case is not of the sort like flushing kids down toilets, but it does involve Sandusky essentially being a time traveler. If you want to understand more about how this happens, read about the McMartin trial or the Fells Acres trial. Those are significantly older and have more benefit of hindsight. But 10 years later this particular case certainly has unraveled. It's a long investment but I encourage listening. It's eye-opening. You didn't specifically answer my questions - my opinions - what are yours? So you believe that Sandusky is not guilty? Guilty. That the 50 or so men who have come forward so far are after the money, trailer-trash, liars, ..............? A few yes, a majority, no. Going back 30/40 years to the 1970's. That Paterno, Curley, and company didn't know what he was and didn't attempt to sweep the whole thing under the rug? They knew, they did - two even admitted it at their trials and were found guilty. Third found guilty and trying to stay out of jail. One dead. That the prosecution and jury got it wrong? They did not. @FS7 |
|
|
|
Quoted: Yall think that's bad, but it's not just the university. I live locally. The people here are all in favor of this BS, not just the students and school. They've started to indoctrinate the kids in grade school too. You can't walk through the downtown State College area TODAY without seeing masks, hundreds of rainbow flags, SJW propaganda posted on businesses, and don't even get me started on the local teens working at those stores. I stopped into Dunkin to grab a coffee and legitimately couldn't tell you the gender of a single employee there. View Quote They just do it a little differently here, but their goal is the same. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-uses-coercive-policies-xinjiang-drive-down-uyghur-birth-rates-think-tank-2021-05-13/ |
|
Doesn't this discriminate against transgenders that want to be identified as a him or her?
|
|
cant2s believe FAA hasnt changed "Notice To Airmen" mesSages .
|
|
Idiocracy: Your Shit's All Retarded (long version) |
|
My dad would be ashamed of what his alma mater has become. I know one of the sociologist professors over there. She is a full out Marxist nut job who all of the students adore. Because of that, I’m not surprised that many students approve of the bullshit.
|
|
Quoted: You didn't specifically answer my questions . So you believe that Sandusky is not guilty? Guilty. That the 50 or so men who have come forward so far are after the money, trailer-trash, liars, ..............? A few yes, a majority, no. Going back 30/40 years to the 1970's. That Paterno, Curley, and company didn't know what he was and didn't attempt to sweep the whole thing under the rug? They knew, they did - two even admitted it at their trials and were found guilty. Third found guilty and trying to stay out of jail. One dead. That the prosecution and jury got it wrong? They did not. @FS7 View Quote I'm sorry, I thought it would have been obvious. No, I do not believe Sandusky is guilty for many reasons, some of which I have stated and others which I have not. Yes, the men who have come forward are lying. I do not care why as I think it's irrelevant, but the promise of money is the primary reason. No, they did not cover up sexual abuse as none happened. They responded to the claims when they were told based on an appropriate understanding of the supposed gravity of the situation (which is not what was reported). I should note all of this is covered in great detail in the podcast. I would encourage you to listen if you have any sort of open mind. It goes quite in depth on the initial allegation, the extensive search and ultimate recruitment of victims, the promise of money to almost anybody making any claim, the actions of the administration, all of it. There's no point in me summarizing what I know and believe here. |
|
Quoted: Most idiotic generation of people in the history of the fucking Country. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: 88.75% of students at the university approved the change, campusreform.org reported. Most idiotic generation of people in the history of the fucking Country. I don't believe they got to that number without some serious fuckery. Hugely biased poll questioning, very selective polling, etc. Or they just outright made it up. |
|
I am making more of a point these days to say yes sir and yes ma'am.
|
|
The simple solution is.....Don't sent your kids to such places.
I don't say anything when someone waxes all proud of their spawn about getting into some liberal university but I think to myself....Way to go dad for paying for the liberal indoctrination of our youth. Parents are way too hung-up on the "good school" thing. |
|
|
Quoted: Now Penn State goes woke! University will drop 'male-centric' terms like 'freshman' and 'senior' - as well as the phrase 'him or her' in a bid to become more inclusive https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9581189/Penn-State-mocked-woke-banning-sexist-words-junior-senior.html In April, the University's Senate Committee on Curricular Affairs passed the 'Removal of Gendered & Binary Terms from Course and Program Descriptions' The senate recommended replacing freshman/sophomore/junior/senior with 'first-year',' second-year' etc. Other recommendations included replacing 'underclassmen' and 'upperclassmen' with 'lower division' and 'upper division' The phrase 'him or her' was also replaced with 'them' in a bid to become gender neutral Reaction to the resolution online has been mixed, with some people mocking the move as a failed attempt to be 'woke' The senate also recommended replacing freshman/sophomore/junior/senior with 'first-year',' second-year' etc. Its members suggested replacing gendered pronouns with neutral terms like 'student,' 'faculty member' or staff member.' Other recommendations included replacing 'underclassmen' and 'upperclassmen' with 'lower division' and 'upper division.' The senate also called for the term 'super seniors' to be axed. That refers to students who have taken longer than the usual four years to complete their studies, over fears the moniker could make some of them self-conscious. The announcement drew mixed criticism from people online, with some calling the move the schools attempt to be 'woke.' 88.75% of students at the university approved the change, campusreform.org reported. View Quote End gov backing of student loans and cancel the debt owed, let these hives of insanity burn. |
|
Quoted: "Lower division" and "Upper division" denote suppression and superiority. I am triggered and demand these phrases removed immediately View Quote And "Year"! Year denotes a finite period of time separate from others, therefore not "Equal and One" |
|
Quoted: The simple solution is.....Don't sent your kids to such places. I don't say anything when someone waxes all proud of their spawn about getting into some liberal university but I think to myself....Way to go dad for paying for the liberal indoctrination of our youth. Parents are way too hung-up on the "good school" thing. View Quote This is correct. I have young children and I'm grossly overeducated, yet my opinion of institutions of "higher learning" drops more every year. Despite having ample time to plan I'm thinking of ways to avoid college that don't involve the military (also a woke nightmare). At this point it seems like Liberty is a good place, while everything else is an indoctrination hellscape. Starving the beast is the correct course of action. |
|
Quoted: How is it fair to be labeling people with terms like first or second? Shouldn't everyone be equal? I'm really concerned about how some people aren't getting grades as high as others too. That doesn't seem to be inclusive. Shouldn't everyone be equal? View Quote |
|
Quoted: As a mechanical engineer I thought I was safe from it. Fucking wrong I was. View Quote When I was in school like 10 years ago I was in Criminology. I saw a lot of other programs starting to make major changes to what they could and couldn't discuss. I was glad I was in criminology as it tends to be conservative types looking to get into LE or former .mil and that sort. I figured it would be one of the last stand type of degrees that would hold out the longest before caving into woke ideology. Fast forward to last year and I had figured I would go for a Masters Degree. I took about 2 classes and realized it is definitely now fully taken over by the woke. |
|
Why do you think the aliens are showing up now? Even they’re tired of this shit
|
|
Quoted: I'm sorry, I thought it would have been obvious. No, I do not believe Sandusky is guilty for many reasons, some of which I have stated and others which I have not. Yes, the men who have come forward are lying. I do not care why as I think it's irrelevant, but the promise of money is the primary reason. No, they did not cover up sexual abuse as none happened. They responded to the claims when they were told based on an appropriate understanding of the supposed gravity of the situation (which is not what was reported). I should note all of this is covered in great detail in the podcast. I would encourage you to listen if you have any sort of open mind. It goes quite in depth on the initial allegation, the extensive search and ultimate recruitment of victims, the promise of money to almost anybody making any claim, the actions of the administration, all of it. There's no point in me summarizing what I know and believe here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You didn't specifically answer my questions . So you believe that Sandusky is not guilty? Guilty. That the 50 or so men who have come forward so far are after the money, trailer-trash, liars, ..............? A few yes, a majority, no. Going back 30/40 years to the 1970's. That Paterno, Curley, and company didn't know what he was and didn't attempt to sweep the whole thing under the rug? They knew, they did - two even admitted it at their trials and were found guilty. Third found guilty and trying to stay out of jail. One dead. That the prosecution and jury got it wrong? They did not. @FS7 I'm sorry, I thought it would have been obvious. No, I do not believe Sandusky is guilty for many reasons, some of which I have stated and others which I have not. Yes, the men who have come forward are lying. I do not care why as I think it's irrelevant, but the promise of money is the primary reason. No, they did not cover up sexual abuse as none happened. They responded to the claims when they were told based on an appropriate understanding of the supposed gravity of the situation (which is not what was reported). I should note all of this is covered in great detail in the podcast. I would encourage you to listen if you have any sort of open mind. It goes quite in depth on the initial allegation, the extensive search and ultimate recruitment of victims, the promise of money to almost anybody making any claim, the actions of the administration, all of it. There's no point in me summarizing what I know and believe here. Well, we certainly disagree on all points, which is fine That's one of the few things that we can arguably still do in this country, depending on the audience/setting. |
|
Quoted: This is correct. I have young children and I'm grossly overeducated, yet my opinion of institutions of "higher learning" drops more every year. Despite having ample time to plan I'm thinking of ways to avoid college that don't involve the military (also a woke nightmare). At this point it seems like Liberty is a good place, while everything else is an indoctrination hellscape. Starving the beast is the correct course of action. View Quote Yes, I went to a PA state school then to PSU for grad work in the 1970's. State school very conservative, PSU mostly. Both now disgustingly one-sidedly liberal. The alternative? Wonder how a place like Penn Tech (2/4 year business/tech/nursing oriented degrees/certificates) is oriented? You would think it would lean conservatively. One problem I see, it's a PSU branch. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.