Being blessed with both a perfectly serviceable husband and a Fein Multimaster, a robotic male would do nothing to contribute to my sexual or emotional well-being. I do believe, however, that a robotic female would benefit me immeasurably along two axes:
1) I’ve long been aware that a sexually frustrated male is a throughly unpleasant, if not outright dangerous, thing to have around. Female sexbots would mitigate the problems in society wrought by involuntary celibacy.
2) Men who are hetero-sexually active incur significant psychic cost, in that they are called upon to interact with those women while vertical and fully clothed, sometimes even in public. This tends to make them bitter and fussy.
3) There is no downside to female sexbots from women’s perspective. The departure from the “dating pool” of men so emotionally barren and socially stunted that they would prefer sex with a “female” machine to a relationship with a female human being represents no loss to womankind. It’s a boon, actually.
For these reasons, I have advocated, here and elsewhere, for federal funding for sexbot - specifically female sexbot - R&D for many years.