User Panel
Quoted: As a group I doubt they are, some individuals being more or less intelligent than others, of course, just as in the population at large. What I find remarkable is that the men here who married the dumb ones never seem to tire of bragging about this accomplishment. View Quote Technically there are more dumb men than dumb women though. Studies have shown there isn't much difference in average intelligence between men and women, but the standard deviation among men is larger than women. This means the majority of both dipshits and geniuses are men. |
|
My wife may know, but if not, one of her 12 employees could tell her. So is she OK or not?
|
|
Quoted: Here's the size of our orbit's deviation from circular, by the way. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/417972/EarthsOrbit_en-1786337.png View Quote To be fair........I was surprised decades ago when the teacher showed us it was the angle of the tilt and not the orbit. That really did surprise me. |
|
Ask her "if you're going 60mph, how far will you go in 2 hours?"
|
|
Quoted: To be fair........I was surprised decades ago when the teacher showed us it was the angle of the tilt and not the orbit. That really did surprise me. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Here's the size of our orbit's deviation from circular, by the way. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/417972/EarthsOrbit_en-1786337.png To be fair........I was surprised decades ago when the teacher showed us it was the angle of the tilt and not the orbit. That really did surprise me. The way to demonstrate it is to go in a darkened room and shine a flashlight at around a 30 degree angle against the wall or floor, then show from the same distance away at a 90 degree angle. It's an exaggerated difference, but it gets the point across. Much, much more light and therefore heat hits at the more direct angle on the same area. |
|
My wife managed dozens of agents and contractors, created and documented several huge databases, handles multiple complex tasks simultaneously, and made more money than I ever did. She keeps us afloat with her competence and huge heart. IDGAF if she knows astronomy.
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Another thread wherein the men in GD via for the honor of being married to or otherwise involved with the dumbest woman. Sort of weird, ain’t it? More like ironic considering her grammar mistake. |
|
Quoted: The way to demonstrate it is to go in a darkened room and shine a flashlight at around a 30 degree angle against the wall or floor, then show from the same distance away at a 90 degree angle. It's an exaggerated difference, but it gets the point across. Much, much more light and therefore heat hits at the more direct angle on the same area. View Quote Good example. |
|
Quoted: Ask your S/O how many times the sun has rotates around the earth in a year. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Ask your S/O how many times the sun has rotates around the earth in a year. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/HOW-DARE-YOU-444.gif |
|
Quoted: The way to demonstrate it is to go in a darkened room and shine a flashlight at around a 30 degree angle against the wall or floor, then show from the same distance away at a 90 degree angle. It's an exaggerated difference, but it gets the point across. Much, much more light and therefore heat hits at the more direct angle on the same area. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Here's the size of our orbit's deviation from circular, by the way. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/417972/EarthsOrbit_en-1786337.png To be fair........I was surprised decades ago when the teacher showed us it was the angle of the tilt and not the orbit. That really did surprise me. The way to demonstrate it is to go in a darkened room and shine a flashlight at around a 30 degree angle against the wall or floor, then show from the same distance away at a 90 degree angle. It's an exaggerated difference, but it gets the point across. Much, much more light and therefore heat hits at the more direct angle on the same area. A interesting factoid about Mercury: because of it's closeness to the sun combined with the ~10 degree inclination of it's orbit, Mercury is one of the hardest to reach bodies in the solar system. IIRC It takes less delta V to land on Pluto than it does to land on Mercury. Also, it takes less delta V to get to Venus or Mars than the Moon, because you can use their atmospheres to brake. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: My wife has an IQ north of 150, got it right, and even knows why it is hotter in the summer which I bet 90% of GD would get wrong. Next challenge: why is it hotter in summer and colder in winter? Well we're at 50% so far. Now be nice!!! |
|
Quoted: A interesting factoid about Mercury: because of it's closeness to the sun combined with the ~10 degree inclination of it's orbit, Mercury is one of the hardest to reach bodies in the solar system. IIRC It takes less delta V to land on Pluto than it does to land on Mercury. Also, it takes less delta V to get to Venus or Mars than the Moon, because you can use their atmospheres to brake. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Here's the size of our orbit's deviation from circular, by the way. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/417972/EarthsOrbit_en-1786337.png To be fair........I was surprised decades ago when the teacher showed us it was the angle of the tilt and not the orbit. That really did surprise me. The way to demonstrate it is to go in a darkened room and shine a flashlight at around a 30 degree angle against the wall or floor, then show from the same distance away at a 90 degree angle. It's an exaggerated difference, but it gets the point across. Much, much more light and therefore heat hits at the more direct angle on the same area. A interesting factoid about Mercury: because of it's closeness to the sun combined with the ~10 degree inclination of it's orbit, Mercury is one of the hardest to reach bodies in the solar system. IIRC It takes less delta V to land on Pluto than it does to land on Mercury. Also, it takes less delta V to get to Venus or Mars than the Moon, because you can use their atmospheres to brake. That is interesting. |
|
|
Quoted: Whoa, I thought Mercury had the least tilt of any planet??? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That is interesting. Whoa, I thought Mercury had the least tilt of any planet??? I think he's referring to the angle of its elliptic plane compared to the average plane of the rest of the system. |
|
|
Quoted: That is interesting. View Quote Also, Mercury is very dense (meaning strong surface gravity for it's mass) and has no atmosphere, both adding to the difficulty. http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/appmissiontable.php One destination that's suprisingly easy to reach because of aerobraking? Saturn's moon Titan. |
|
My wife said: Mother Very Thoughtfully Made A Jelly Sandwich Under No Protest: Mercury!
|
|
It took a few guesses but she got it. She did know we are the three planet, thanks Joe Diffie (RIP)
|
|
|
I wonder how anyone that graduated high school wouldn't know this.
Im pretty sure that learning about space is racist now. |
|
Quoted: A interesting factoid about Mercury: because of it's closeness to the sun combined with the ~10 degree inclination of it's orbit, Mercury is one of the hardest to reach bodies in the solar system. IIRC It takes less delta V to land on Pluto than it does to land on Mercury. Also, it takes less delta V to get to Venus or Mars than the Moon, because you can use their atmospheres to brake. View Quote TRUE! But, you lost 90% of GD with Delta V. |
|
Quoted: TRUE! But, you lost 90% of GD with Delta V. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A interesting factoid about Mercury: because of it's closeness to the sun combined with the ~10 degree inclination of it's orbit, Mercury is one of the hardest to reach bodies in the solar system. IIRC It takes less delta V to land on Pluto than it does to land on Mercury. Also, it takes less delta V to get to Venus or Mars than the Moon, because you can use their atmospheres to brake. TRUE! But, you lost 90% of GD with Delta V. That's when you put the dick (delta) in the vagina (V) |
|
Quoted: I asked mine who were the mercury 7. She said is that a band? View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: My wife has an IQ north of 150, got it right, and even knows why it is hotter in the summer which I bet 90% of GD would get wrong. Next challenge: why is it hotter in summer and colder in winter? View Quote My wife said Saturn, but then the next text was "the 64405 isn't going to pay on this guy" so I'm going to give her a pass. |
|
Quoted: Mine knew the planet and 4 of the Mercury 7. She gifted me this for my birthday a few years back. Signed by 4. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/20638/tempImager8Tcg3_jpg-1786391.JPG View Quote Very cool!!! |
|
Quoted: That's trivia. I wonder how many people could name 2 founding fathers off the top of their head? View Quote Our kids are home-schooled and classically educated so history and science are high priorities at our house. The 8 yo son built his own planetarium and the 10 yo daughter & I were talking about the beer-drinking, hell-raising Adams boys at dinner the other night. |
|
Quoted: I don’t know what you call it but I got a picture of it a while back. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49050125436_9faf1e5e01_b.jpgMercury Solar Transit 20191111 Detail by FredMan, on Flickr View Quote I got to watch the Venusian transit, but I had no way of taking pictures of it with my telescope, although I gave it my best shot. Haven't had a chance to look at Mercury's, yet. |
|
|
Quoted: https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-c498c2d924b987694bb3f3746f6fac94.webp Yep. Inclination changes in low orbits require large amounts Delta-V, since it's based on orbital velocity. (Also, mistake on mercury's angle, it's 7 degrees, not 10. Ceres is 10 degrees) Mercury's orbit is also fairly eccentric/elliptical. View Quote Never knew that.....thanks. ETA: Amazing how people figure these things out. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Here's the size of our orbit's deviation from circular, by the way. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/417972/EarthsOrbit_en-1786337.png To be fair........I was surprised decades ago when the teacher showed us it was the angle of the tilt and not the orbit. That really did surprise me. The way to demonstrate it is to go in a darkened room and shine a flashlight at around a 30 degree angle against the wall or floor, then show from the same distance away at a 90 degree angle. It's an exaggerated difference, but it gets the point across. Much, much more light and therefore heat hits at the more direct angle on the same area. A interesting factoid about Mercury: because of it's closeness to the sun combined with the ~10 degree inclination of it's orbit, Mercury is one of the hardest to reach bodies in the solar system. IIRC It takes less delta V to land on Pluto than it does to land on Mercury. Also, it takes less delta V to get to Venus or Mars than the Moon, because you can use their atmospheres to brake. That is interesting. Rough Delta V required to reach a low orbit from LEO (Factoring in aerobraking): 3,700m/s Venus 3,750m/s Mars 3,970m/s Luna 7,400m/s Titan 8,430m/s Vesta 9,470m/s Ceres 9,910m/s Callisto 10,560m/s Ganymede 11,350m/s Pluto 11,750m/s Europa 12,780m/s Io 13,110m/s Mercury To Surface: 4,200m/s Mars 5,690m/s Luna 7,500m/s Titan 8,610m/s Vesta 9,830m/s Ceres 11,660m/s Callisto 12,240m/s Pluto 12,510m/s Ganymede 13,190m/s Europa 14,560m/s Io 16,170m/s Mercury |
|
Quoted: More like ironic considering her grammar mistake. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Another thread wherein the men in GD via for the honor of being married to or otherwise involved with the dumbest woman. Sort of weird, ain’t it? More like ironic considering her grammar mistake. Actually, it wasn’t. If I’d made a grammatical error in a post laying claim to grammatical inerrancy or taking issue with another’s grammar, that would have been ironic. If my post had been made in the context of a history of similar behavior on my part, i.e., shit talking my spouse in a public venue, it would have been hypocritical, but still not ironic. Contrary to popular opinion the two words are not synonymous. What is ironic, is that you misused the word “ironic” - a semantic error - when you characterized my post as “ironic”. The more appropriate descriptive word would have been “bitchy”. Against this charge, I would have had no rejoinder. |
|
My wife is an engineer, she knows not only the order of the planets but probably the entire periodic table. As a kid she did math problems for fun.
|
|
Quoted: My wife is an engineer, she knows not only the order of the planets but probably the entire periodic table. As a kid she did math problems for fun. View Quote I got damn close to having the periodic table memorized in high school. I did not get particularly close to vaginas in high school. I wonder if there was a correlation there... |
|
|
Quoted: Because we're closer to the sun in our elliptical orbit during summer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: My wife has an IQ north of 150, got it right, and even knows why it is hotter in the summer which I bet 90% of GD would get wrong. Next challenge: why is it hotter in summer and colder in winter? BZZT https://www.space.com/3304-earth-closest-sun-dead-winter.html |
|
Quoted: Actually, it wasn’t. If I’d made a grammatical error in a post laying claim to grammatical inerrancy or taking issue with another’s grammar, that would have been ironic. If my post had been made in the context of a history of similar behavior on my part, i.e., shit talking my spouse in a public venue, it would have been hypocritical, but still not ironic. Contrary to popular opinion the two words are not synonymous. What is ironic, is that you misused the word “ironic” - a semantic error - when you characterized my post as “ironic”. The more appropriate descriptive word would have been “bitchy”. Against this charge, I would have had no rejoinder. View Quote Doesn't matter to me. I got a chuckle out of it because you mentioned "dumbest woman" and blew it by trying to be so smart and failed. It is what it is , we all do it. Naner naner !!! |
|
Quoted: I got damn close to having the periodic table memorized in high school. I did not get particularly close to vaginas in high school. I wonder if there was a correlation there... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: My wife is an engineer, she knows not only the order of the planets but probably the entire periodic table. As a kid she did math problems for fun. I got damn close to having the periodic table memorized in high school. I did not get particularly close to vaginas in high school. I wonder if there was a correlation there... I'll be damned, me too. Must be a pattern. |
|
Quoted: Nice! So you’re married to an astronomer and/or astrophysicist? Mine did say Mercury. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Mine said, "The conventional answer is Mercury. However, it depends on your definition of planet, there are other bodies that come in closer at times and it is not a universal negative that there has never been or will never be an object that could qualify as a planet that will at least at one point come in closer then Mercury." No Sh*t that is word for word her exact initial answer. I asked further and she went into a long list of potentials from comets that in the younger solar system we're most likely bigger then Mercury, to not all the planets are still around and different planetary arrangements in the young solar system, the "Nemisis" dark binary solar pair of our sun to, planet-X, and "Naberu" and "Vulcan" (not startrek different Vulcan planet where astroid belt now is), et. . . . etc. . . . Nice! So you’re married to an astronomer and/or astrophysicist? Mine did say Mercury. No, that answer of hers would actually raise an eyebrow on an astronomer and/or astrophysicst. She is smart, but she is also a contrary non-conformist who is always trying to find the "correct answer" which by her theory CANNOT be the conventional answer that all the experts say is the correct answer just because it's the answer the "cabal of expertcrats & technocrats are trying to push" (exact phrase her words not mine). She also argues like a freaking lawyer. And she listens to too much Coast To Coast AM and similar. I did see her once give a retired NASA engineer a royal headache once arguing with him at a wedding reception (distant in-law) for like 4-hours straight about all the stuff she thinks NASA is hiding from the citizens and spending their tax dollars on and how by the constitution it's high treason and all the "paperclips" that make NASA rotten and evil from the core from the beginning. |
|
Also, those "Delta-V" based calculations that have become the most recent part of this discussion.
That all applies to unmanned missions fairly well with transit time not being a significant factor with small exceptions for power resourcing. Once you start discussing manned missions transit time starts becoming a huge issue as well. Human crews are huge resource sinks on a time basis as well as radiation exposure issues where transit time is a huge factor. So when you start talking about missions to Pluto or Titan being so easy (especially when comparing to moon or Mars) your talking unmanned for that calculation. Manned missions its a lot bugger calculation with "Delta" not being the only major factor. It becomes a multi major factor calculation. |
|
I am disappoint.
Named every one EXCEPT Mercury. Well, and Pluto. Freakin' women. |
|
|
Quoted: No, that answer of hers would actually raise an eyebrow on an astronomer and/or astrophysicst. She is smart, but she is also a contrary non-conformist who is always trying to find the "correct answer" which by her theory CANNOT be the conventional answer that all the experts say is the correct answer just because it's the answer the "cabal of expertcrats & technocrats are trying to push" (exact phrase her words not mine). She also argues like a freaking lawyer. And she listens to too much Coast To Coast AM and similar. I did see her once give a retired NASA engineer a royal headache once arguing with him at a wedding reception (distant in-law) for like 4-hours straight about all the stuff she thinks NASA is hiding from the citizens and spending their tax dollars on and how by the constitution it's high treason and all the "paperclips" that make NASA rotten and evil from the core from the beginning. View Quote uhhhhhh hmmm nevermind |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.