User Panel
Quoted: Nope. This will be stopped by the USSC. They will rule that it must go through the correct agency of our choosing before it can be reversed. View Quote If thats a concern, there will be 15 justices hearing that case. (I think the court we have now will green-light anything they want to do) |
|
Meh just ignoe anything he does like the left does with the Constitution
|
|
|
Quoted: In the next two years, we will be treated to a speech by Uncle Joe telling us to turn our thermostats down to 55 that we waste too much energy and America will never be able to produce enough to meet our needs without renewables...... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1BFftwInAg If it weren't for election rigging it would almost be fun too watch the next 2-4 years unfold as the fucking clowns run the country again. View Quote Did Peanut boy create the Department of Energy? He said energy shortages are permanent. Democrats lie. It is all about conservation. |
|
Quoted: Too many have either forgotten this period of time or never lived through the energy crisis. Joe is going to be Carter 2.0. Hopefully that means there is light at the end of a 4 year tunnel View Quote That will never happen. Democrat vote fraud is the determinant of who wins elections from here on out. |
|
|
I think Biden will. He is following bathhouse Barry’s dance steps.
|
|
Quoted: I'm sure the talking points are already written. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Wonder how the unions will spin it when Pedo shuts it down? Hundreds of union jobs lost yet they continue to vote libtard. Way to go, dumbasses. I'm sure the talking points are already written. FBHO laid that out years ago, the pipeline only creates about 10 permanent jobs. Yeah, 1000 miles long, with 50 pumping stations, consuming 750MW of electricity. |
|
Maybe Algore can come back from the dead with his energy credit market game. All dems have to eat, right?
|
|
Quoted: Wonder how the unions will spin it when Pedo shuts it down? Hundreds of union jobs lost yet they continue to vote libtard. Way to go, dumbasses. View Quote Critical thinking doesn't seem to be present in the mental toolbox of most union members I've interacted with over the years...regardless of the union. |
|
Gotta drive those gas prices up every way possible. If it's good for the economy and energy prices Biden will be against it.
Just like Obama. |
|
|
Any time you want to put hard working Americans on the unemployment line, just vote democrat. Works every time.
|
|
Quoted: Why does the left have such a hard on for this pipeline? View Quote One of their major DNC donors owns a good portion the rail cars that the crude is currently transported from Canada to Houston on. When the pipeline is completed he stands to lose a whole lot of money. What people don’t understand is the crude will still get to Houston; it is all about who is getting paid. You know JB is going to get a payday if he cancels the permit. |
|
Quoted: Its simple, kill the pipeline and you have to run the oil on track owned by Warren Buffet. They own all the track leading into the refineries. View Quote No, the only other viable option is to ship it. Train cars dont move enough and are the slowest option for loading/unloading. Ships unload much faster directly to the terminals. A train car has a max capacity of 34,000 gallons, a ULCC can carry 168,000,000 gallons. It would take almost 5,000 train tank cars to move the same amount of oil. The idiots on the left think they are protecting the environment by opposing pipelines but they fail to see that the oi is going to be moved one way or another and that means oil tankers sailing up and down the coast. I was looking at an AIS map the otehr day and there were 27 oil tankers parked off SOCAL waiting to go in and unload yet they keep voting no on a pipeline. I bet they have no clue that right off shore is a virtual parking lot of tankers. |
|
|
|
If it’s good for the US it’s done.
Bunch of fucking scab Democrats. |
|
fuggin' POS... these people don't know jack shit about running anything... fuggin' walking disasters, only good for swindling...
|
|
It's very bad for the economy, and especially bad for Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. Hope he cancels it.
|
|
You know whos gonna be REAL happy?
Russia Russia Russia...lol |
|
|
|
This is a really good time to buy energy, especially oil, stocks.
|
|
Didn't Obama's energy secretary say he needed to figure out a way to get gas prices to that of European countries? This is one of the ways to do that.
Their GOAL is high oil prices - it is the only way Green energy is even a consideration for most people. |
|
|
|
Quoted: FBHO laid that out years ago, the pipeline only creates about 10 permanent jobs. Yeah, 1000 miles long, with 50 pumping stations, consuming 750MW of electricity. View Quote So... screw those 10 people? You’re right though. Maybe 10 jobs controlling the pumps, hundreds of related ones. Also, why isn’t this pipeline built already?!? |
|
|
Of course gas will be $3 by next year. Already up to $1.97 now.
|
|
Quoted: So... screw those 10 people? You’re right though. Maybe 10 jobs controlling the pumps, hundreds of related ones. Also, why isn’t this pipeline built already?!? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: FBHO laid that out years ago, the pipeline only creates about 10 permanent jobs. Yeah, 1000 miles long, with 50 pumping stations, consuming 750MW of electricity. So... screw those 10 people? You’re right though. Maybe 10 jobs controlling the pumps, hundreds of related ones. Also, why isn’t this pipeline built already?!? I should of made my sarcasm more obvious. But yes hundreds of direct jobs and thousands of related would of been created. FBHO, FDNC, FJB. There are a couple reasons the pipeline wasn't built. They ran into BS legal/environmental trouble in NE and MT thanks to activist judges, IIRC. Also crossing the Canada/US border requires a State Dept permit and FBHO jacked them on that for years. I think MAGA fixed that but the NE and MT troubles got dragged out. |
|
|
Quoted: No, the only other viable option is to ship it. Train cars dont move enough and are the slowest option for loading/unloading. Ships unload much faster directly to the terminals. A train car has a max capacity of 34,000 gallons, a ULCC can carry 168,000,000 gallons. It would take almost 5,000 train tank cars to move the same amount of oil. The idiots on the left think they are protecting the environment by opposing pipelines but they fail to see that the oi is going to be moved one way or another and that means oil tankers sailing up and down the coast. I was looking at an AIS map the otehr day and there were 27 oil tankers parked off SOCAL waiting to go in and unload yet they keep voting no on a pipeline. I bet they have no clue that right off shore is a virtual parking lot of tankers. View Quote I think Alberta is getting blocked from new pipelines to either coast as well. Canada is breaking it off hard in Alberta. Robbing them with taxes to pay for their coastal utopia's while Alberta gets strangled with environmental regulations. |
|
|
The union workers on the keystone project backed Biden and the democrats they are getting exactly what they deserve.
I am glad they are going to lose their jobs |
|
Will our Canuckistanian neighbor's soon stop singing the praises of Bidet?
|
|
|
Quoted: Warren Buffett has a vested interest in the Keystone Pipeline going away. He's heavily invested in rail cars to transport crude oil. So much for the environment if it gets in the way of a liberal making a profit. View Quote Ironically I did some googling and it turns out he supposedly SUPPORTS the pipeline. He's 90 years old and the 4th richest person in the world. |
|
Quoted: Why can't he just invest in the pipeline instead? Ironically I did some googling and it turns out he supposedly SUPPORTS the pipeline. He's 90 years old and the 4th richest person in the world. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Warren Buffett has a vested interest in the Keystone Pipeline going away. He's heavily invested in rail cars to transport crude oil. So much for the environment if it gets in the way of a liberal making a profit. Ironically I did some googling and it turns out he supposedly SUPPORTS the pipeline. He's 90 years old and the 4th richest person in the world. Good question. He also paid to get the Native American to protest the pipeline as well. He can invest in the pipeline, but he would get stuck with rail cars with no product to ship. At 90, I wouldn’t worry about it, but he has political power and uses it still. |
|
It makes me fucking sick that cheating, America hating piece of shit is going to be sitting in the oval office as a President.
Fuck |
|
|
|
Quoted: It's very bad for the economy, and especially bad for Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. Hope he cancels it. View Quote Attached File |
|
Canada gets most of it's money selling natural recourses. It would be a severe economic blow to them.
That is the only way they can maintain the cash flow for their social programs. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.