BoomBoom,
Did you really think about your veiwpoint before you made that moronic statment about supporting laws to require all pets spayed and neutoered? Some pet owners cant take care of their pets, no arguments from me there. Some pets should be "fixed", ok I agree. But passing a law because some people cant take care or be resposible for their pets, your crazy. I figured a gun owner, especially one from Kalifornia, would understand that passing stupid laws to force society into copliance is the last thing anyone wants. After all, SOME people shouldnt own guns, I dont agree with a law that says you cant make anymore guns though.
So, after all pets are effectivly sterilzed in CA, what then? When your kid wants a dog are you going to drive to AZ to buy one? Pay to import it? How much will it be to register your pet after they have to keep track of all the stupid info your law brings? Will you have to pay for the license and wait while your new pet is approved by the state before you can even bring it in to CA? Is any of this startng to remind you of somehting that just happened in Kalifornia?
Supporting that law is exactly the same as supporting anti-gun or anti-freedom laws. People shoud take care of their own business, not have to pass laws that effect the majority in order to care for the minority. You are a real MORON if you support that law and you deserved to have your gun rights screwed in CA, thats what you want to do to everyone who happens to like dogs or cats instead of guns.
You probably have that same stupid attitude that the anti gunners have, "its not that big of a hassle for them", "It doesnt really effect your rights, you can still own a gun/dog/cat, you just need to prove you can handle it first."
You may not be that stupid, but in my book your an idiot if you have the balls to complain that someone screwed with your rights(gun rights) but your are publicly saying that you would be willing to have laws that restrict others rights simply because it wont effect you.