Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 12/15/2003 5:07:06 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/15/2003 5:52:38 PM EDT by Airwolf]
Uh, Kofi? Do the letters "FO" mean anything to you?

It was OUR people among others that died in Iraq. It was the IRAQI PEOPLE that died because of this asswipe and I think Saddam's fate should rest with his victims and those that RISKED THEIR ASSES to remove him from power, not you and not your corrupt socialist organization.

The fact that even Brits have said that they don't have a problem with imposing the death penalty should tell you something, shouldn't it, Kofi?

www.boston.com/dailynews/349/world/Secretary_General_Annan_reject:.shtml

Secretary-General Annan rejects any trial that could lead to Saddam's execution

By Associated Press, 12/15/2003 15:16

UNITED NATIONS (AP) The top U.N. diplomat said Monday he could not support bringing captured Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein before a tribunal that might sentence him to death.

''The U.N. does not support death penalty. In all the courts we have set up (U.N. officials) have not included death penalty,'' Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in a brief encounter with reporters at the United Nations.

''And so as secretary-general and the U.N. as an organization are not going to turn around and support a death penalty,'' Annan said.

Last week, Iraq's Governing Council adopted a measure setting up a special war crimes tribunal.

Council members have said since Saddam's capture Saturday that he would be tried before the special tribunal and could face the death penalty.

Other courts dealing with war crimes that have been set up by the United Nations include the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia formed in 1993. The tribunal, based in The Hague, Netherlands, has tried 43 people; former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic is now on trial.

In Africa, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, a United Nations court based in Tanzania, is trying dozens of people for the 1994 genocide that killed 500,000 people. Local courts are trying other suspects in Rwanda.

The new International Criminal Court is the world's first permanent war crimes tribunal. The United States opposes it, fearing that Americans will be singled out for frivolous cases. U.S. officials have signed deals with more than 30 countries to prevent Americans from being extradited to the court in The Hague.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 5:09:49 PM EDT
All the political thugs try to protect each other.... never know Kofi might be a war criminal one day.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 5:13:36 PM EDT
Fuck him.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 5:23:25 PM EDT
I don't think Sadam would be opposed to being executed if found guilty. After all, he's obviously been a strong supporter of the death penalty in the past.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 5:33:52 PM EDT
This is the very same reason the UN has zero credibility in my opinion. If Sadaam doesn't deserve the death penalty, than what the hell do you have to do to deserve it????
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 5:34:18 PM EDT
[ROFL2] Vulcan94
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 5:38:01 PM EDT
Originally Posted By TheWind: All the political thugs try to protect each other.... never know Kofi might be a war criminal one day.
View Quote
That is exactly what I was thinking. Kofi is a thug and when the U.N. becomes a criminal organization under his rule, he doesn't want his ass to get stoned in an ally. Fuck him and the U.N.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 5:45:17 PM EDT
I'd seriously like to punch him in the face every time I see him. But then i'd have to go to the security council and get a resolution, then we'ed have to vote on it, then the french would say no, then I'd have to get another resolution, then we'ed vote on it, the the germans would veto then....... Really, he's just a SECRETARY! Let me talk to the boss.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 5:54:41 PM EDT
After the guilty verdict (the trial shouldn't take more than a day) I say turn him over to the survivors of his victims. Arm them only with plastic butter knives. That would be justice.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 6:24:59 PM EDT
His sons seemed to enjoy the sights and sounds of the ole chipper/shredder.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 6:32:20 PM EDT
Hey Kofi! Sorry pal, you don't have a dog in this fight. You didn't participate in the war, you dug in your heels and fought us at every turn, you supported a brutal dictator, even if it was by non-action, you continue to be worried more about American hegemony that guys like Saddam...and clearly you don't REALLY give a rat's ass about poor folks living under a monster like Saddam. See now...do you get it? You ain't driving this bus...WE ARE! Sooo...why don't you just go FUCK OFF!
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 6:37:52 PM EDT
Secretary-General Annan rejects any trial that could lead to Saddam's execution By Associated Press, 12/15/2003 15:16 UNITED NATIONS (AP) The top U.N. diplomat said Monday he could not support bringing captured Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein before a tribunal that might sentence him to death. ''The U.N. does not support death penalty. In all the courts we have set up (U.N. officials) have not included death penalty,'' Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in a brief encounter with reporters at the United Nations. ''And so as secretary-general and the U.N. as an organization are not going to turn around and support a death penalty,'' Annan said.
View Quote
I'm sorry. He must confuse us with a nation that really gives a shit about the UN. CW
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 6:42:49 PM EDT
If we bought the West Bank from Isreal, created a Palestinian State and moved the U.N. there, would God hate us?
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 6:44:56 PM EDT
This is another reason why the US should let Saddam be tried in an Iraqi court---they can do whatever the hell they want with him and the UN can't do shit about it.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 6:47:21 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/15/2003 6:48:33 PM EDT by Skibane]
Originally Posted By lvgunner777: This is the very same reason the UN has zero credibility in my opinion. If Sadaam doesn't deserve the death penalty, than what the hell do you have to do to deserve it????
View Quote
According to the UN, there isn't [i]anything[/i] you can do to deserve it. Hitler, Pol Pot, Idi Amin – you name the tyrant – all of them get a pass, in the UN's eyes. It's not just the death penalty they oppose; they don't even want you to be able to discipline your own children by spanking them (link to story [url=http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20031008-082622-3212r.htm]here[/url]).
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 7:05:39 PM EDT
I reject any trial that would find Kofi Annan innocent of being a third-world socialist anti-US dumbass. Do you think they'll sell popcorn at Saddam's execution? I'm gonna get in line for tickets now to make sure I get a front seat.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 7:09:16 PM EDT
Too bad the UN isn't like a publicly shared company. With all the money we have thrown in, whe would definitely have the controlling interest.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 7:10:48 PM EDT
Let's get the U.S. State Dept. to declare ole Kofi persona non grata, and boot his skinny ass right the hell out of here, while we're at it, let's just kick all the little pricks of the UN out of here. As far as I'm concerned the UN is about as worthless as tits on a bull, especially after all the bullsh*t we had to put up with because of them p*ssy-footing around with the whole Iraq issue.[50][pound][nuts][buttkick][sniper2][BS]
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 7:11:11 PM EDT
Who cares what he thinks, nobody asked him and we don't pay him any heed. If he doensn't like it, too friggin bad. Piss off!
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 7:21:31 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Airwolf: Secretary-General Annan rejects any trial that could lead to Saddam's execution By Associated Press, 12/15/2003 15:16 UNITED NATIONS (AP) The top U.N. diplomat said Monday he could not support bringing captured Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein before a tribunal that might sentence him to death...
View Quote
[b]SO...THE...FUCK...WHAT?[/b]
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 7:29:06 PM EDT
Lot to be said for keeping him alive. You only die once. Just think, we could torment him daily. Think of facing torment by relatives of the 300,000 dead on a daily basis.
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 7:57:40 PM EDT
Originally Posted By piccolo: Lot to be said for keeping him alive. You only die once. Just think, we could torment him daily. Think of facing torment by relatives of the 300,000 dead on a daily basis.
View Quote
[img]http://flymeaway.net/images/keefe.gif[/img]
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 8:21:15 PM EDT
**ZZZZZZZZZZ** Huh? Did someone say something? Oh, him? Whatever.... **ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ**
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 8:30:38 PM EDT
Who?
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 8:35:19 PM EDT
gather round so we can sing a 'hymn' for Mr Annan... HIM HIM FUCK HIM
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 11:05:48 PM EDT
Secretary-General Annan now this is one dangerous dude. If he had it his way we would all be unarmed and our military would be under his control(UN). The guy needs to be taken out back and have the crap beat out of him then send him back to...? wherever he came from. Anyway who the hell would lisen to someone named Kofi...lol
Link Posted: 12/15/2003 11:10:26 PM EDT
Link Posted: 12/16/2003 6:20:14 AM EDT
Secretary-General Annan rejects any trial that could lead to Saddam's execution Annan is as irrelevant in particular as the UN is in general.
Link Posted: 12/16/2003 11:25:44 AM EDT
What do you expect from a glorified convenience-store clerk who now lounges in NYC, buys the best whores/boys and booze, and cruises around on a diplomatic pass?
Top Top