User Panel
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/25004/exclusive-first-images-of-new-vh-92-marine-one-helo-in-full-colors-landing-on-white-house-lawn http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=60&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1542663394303-dd1313c.jpg http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=60&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1542654875684-f677.jpg I had my hopes up that Trump was coming for a surprise visit. |
|
Quoted:
I expected Trump to fly in this. https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/053110osprey9cr.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=664&h=441&crop=1 View Quote |
|
|
Didn't the USSS say that they won't allow the President to fly on an Osprey?
|
|
Quoted:
I expected Trump to fly in this. https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/053110osprey9cr.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=664&h=441&crop=1 View Quote |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: They cancelled that and started over after, I hope, somebody beat the USSS and NAVAIR over the head with the final package of requirements from the last one. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Your seat's in the back, Mr. President. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/YAH-64_parked_right-front_view.jpg View Quote |
|
|
Those doors look pretty sweet
|
|
Where is the rocket-propelled, parachute-equipped, escape pod?
|
|
Quoted:
I expected Trump to fly in this. https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/053110osprey9cr.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=664&h=441&crop=1 View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I'm relieved that he didn't. I remember the 60 Minutes TV show segment about the Osprey that the Marines wanted so bad and had been crashing and killing Marines. The Marine Corps command knew about the malfunctions that the Osprey had and they tried to cover it up. That segment had the Marine Officer that was being interviewed, ride on an Osprey with 60 Minutes crew to prove that the Osprey was safe. He looked kind of nervous when they filmed that flight. They never did say if Bell Helicopter ever figured out what was causing the crashes and if they ever resolved that "issue." View Quote |
|
So what kind of inspections does our presidents aircraft go through? And who gets to turn the wrenches?
|
|
Quoted:
Can someone explain this statement: "The U.S. Air Force approved the VH-92A designation on Oct. 3, 2014." Why does the USAF get to approve a Naval Aircraft nomenclature? View Quote |
|
|
I remember years ago Trump owned a Puma. It was really nice. Hell I think he had a Chinook too.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Don't those crash all the time? I say shithook or nothing View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
HMX-1 squadron must have their own maintenance people? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: I'm relieved that he didn't. I remember the 60 Minutes TV show segment about the Osprey that the Marines wanted so bad and had been crashing and killing Marines. The Marine Corps command knew about the malfunctions that the Osprey had and they tried to cover it up. That segment had the Marine Officer that was being interviewed, ride on an Osprey with 60 Minutes crew to prove that the Osprey was safe. He looked kind of nervous when they filmed that flight. They never did say if Bell Helicopter ever figured out what was causing the crashes and if they ever resolved that "issue." View Quote I can't believe these idiots fall for these obvious false narratives about guns, the media are so obvious with their agenda! But also: OMG 60 minutes really exposed the osprey and the Marines with real hard hitting and factual investigative journalism I remember it clearly |
|
|
53K is probably overkill for that task.
S92 is typically a better fit. Trump has a few S76’s in his personal fleet. Attached File |
|
Quoted:
That thing would tear up the lawn and destroy all the plants around it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I expected Trump to fly in this. https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/053110osprey9cr.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=664&h=441&crop=1 I do think they should have a couple of Ospreys set up for POTUS transportation. There are a lot of transportation missions where they would save a lot of time and streamline the entire mission profile. Not every day from WH to Andrews, but there are other places it would be appropriate. |
|
|
Quoted:
That was when it was a good aircraft handicapped by requirements growth. Now it’s a shitty (but US indigenous) aircraft with far lower requirements. Winning! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I thought the new tender for Marine One's was withdrawn under Obama due to cost? How does this one exist? |
|
Quoted:
It’s a Blackhawk powertrain with a much larger and heavier fuselage. Worse margins all around and good for hauling self loading cargo to oil platforms, that’s about it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I thought the new tender for Marine One's was withdrawn under Obama due to cost? How does this one exist? |
|
Quoted:
I'm relieved that he didn't. I remember the 60 Minutes TV show segment about the Osprey that the Marines wanted so bad and had been crashing and killing Marines. The Marine Corps command knew about the malfunctions that the Osprey had and they tried to cover it up. That segment had the Marine Officer that was being interviewed, ride on an Osprey with 60 Minutes crew to prove that the Osprey was safe. He looked kind of nervous when they filmed that flight. They never did say if Bell Helicopter ever figured out what was causing the crashes and if they ever resolved that "issue." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I expected Trump to fly in this. https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/053110osprey9cr.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=664&h=441&crop=1 CV-22 and MV-22 variants, has surpassed the 400,000 flight hour milestone. The V-22 Osprey has been continuously deployed since entering service in 2007 with the United States Marine Corps (USMC) and the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) in 2009. The aircraft has seen extensive action in Afghanistan as part of Operation Enduring Freedom, in Iraq as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and as part of a U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force (SPMAGTF) supporting a long-range rapid reaction/crisis response force. |
|
|
Quoted:
It’s a Blackhawk powertrain with a much larger and heavier fuselage. Worse margins all around and good for hauling self loading cargo to oil platforms, that’s about it. View Quote It's the same basic design and layout as a Blackhawk but shares no parts. The engines produce significantly more power than common blackhawks and the rotors/drivetrain are larger and capable of using the higher power. I'm not in the know about the ospreys in hmx1, but as I understand the president does not fly on a v22 due to risk. A v22 is more complex and has more moving flight critical parts than a helicopter and this is reflected in statistical reliability calculations that are used for airworthiness and safety purposes. |
|
Ospreys are junk. There are a few that are green top. They ferry press and parts.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Didn't the USSS say that they won't allow the President to fly on an Osprey? Good enough for FLOTUS apparently. |
|
OSINT says Trump Airlines only owned that helicopter from 89-92. Looks like that tail number is on a Cessna now and the helo is owned by Columbia Helicopters Inc.
|
|
Quoted:
Can someone explain this statement: "The U.S. Air Force approved the VH-92A designation on Oct. 3, 2014." Why does the USAF get to approve a Naval Aircraft nomenclature? View Quote No, you don’t get to be an H-92, H-61 is the next unassigned design number for helicopters. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.