Goddamn it! You can't do a fucking thing anymore without exposing yourself to lawsuits.
I am SO sick and tired of this shit!
[pissed]
[url]http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/173/metro/Jury_to_decide_liability_in_accident+.shtml[/url]
Jury to decide liability in accident
Teen left brain dead after being hit by car
By Kathleen Burge, Globe Staff, 6/22/2003
PRINGFIELD -- It was the most mundane of gestures, a wave of the hand allegedly from a driver who stopped his van for two teenage girls trying to cross the street. He motioned, one witness later said, for them to pass before his vehicle.
The results were catastrophic. As Amy Woods, 14, moved beyond the van and into the next lane, another car slammed into her body. She was tossed into the air with such force that a shoe flew off one foot.
Was the accident that left Amy profoundly brain-damaged a terrible twist of fate, a lifetime of pain wrought in one awful moment? Or did the van driver cause the crash by waving Amy to her doom?
Later this year, a jury will decide whether the driver gestured -- he maintains that he did not -- and if so, whether he can be held partly responsible for Amy's injuries. The state Appeals Court considered the issue for the first time last year, overturning the decision of a lower court judge who threw out the case.
The case is unusual because Amy's parents, Kay and Gary Woods, sued not only the driver who hit their daughter -- that case has been settled -- but the Nynex van driver, Roger O'Neil, who did not touch her.
''Just think of the number of times you've done that yourself,'' said David White-Lief, a personal injury lawyer in Boston. ''You want to be helpful. The trouble is, you have to understand that the person is relying on that, and maybe more than you intend.''
But others fear the decision creates an legal expansion of personal responsibility, an unfortunate kernel of encouragement to an overly litigious society. Lawyers for the van driver argue that Woods was responsible for her own fate. She didn't look, they told the Appeals Court, as she ran in front of the car that hit her.
Drivers who wave pedestrians across the street act out of courtesy and do not negate pedestrians' responsibility for their own safety, Pamela A. Smith, a lawyer for O'Neil and his employer, Nynex, argued to the Appeals Court.
Amy, now 21, spent more than a year in the hospital after the accident, and now lives at the Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center in New Hampshire. She cannot feed herself, walk, or communicate.
The accident took place on a Tuesday afternoon, Feb. 6, 1996. After school, Amy had gone to visit a friend, Colleen Fettes, a classmate she'd known since elementary school. Then they headed to the house of another friend. They easily crossed the first two lanes of Page Boulevard, a four-lane road, and waited on the double yellow lines.
It was about 4 p.m. and O'Neil was just finishing his work day as a repairman for Nynex, driving his company van to the garage. When he saw the two teenagers in the middle of the street, he slowed to a stop.
He later said he never gestured to them, only stopped because he feared they might dart in front of him. Nynex company policy prohibited workers from motioning pedestrians to cross in front of company vehicles.
Amy went first, and as she stepped into the second lane, O'Neil said he saw a white blur out of the corner of his eye. ''I think I closed my eyes because I knew what was about to happen,'' he said in a deposition. She froze, he said, when she saw the car coming at her.
Jeffrey Felix, a part-time postal clerk, was driving his wife to a bookstore to pick up a map she'd ordered. He never saw the girls, he said, until the moment his white station wagon struck Amy. ''It looked like she jumped on my hood,'' he said in a deposition.
The case will not be easy for the Woods to win. William Spano, whose car was behind O'Neil's van before Amy was hit, is the only witness who said he saw the van driver gesture for the girls to cross.
In 1999, Superior Court Judge C. Brian McDonald threw out the Woods' lawsuit against O'Neil and Nynex (now Verizon Communications), ruling that there wasn't enough evidence that Amy saw a signal, and even if she did, that she relied on it.
But the Appeals Court overturned that decision, saying a jury should decide. ''We cannot rule as a matter of law that his signal to the girls could only be interpreted as allowing them to pass in front of his van or that his duty to the girls extended no further than the front of his van,'' Justice Scott J. Kafker wrote for the court.