Quoted:
_twist -
You may beleive otherwise, but your posts read like a college educated but brain washed individual.
Sounds just like typical eggheaded gobbledy gook of professors who are so far removed from actually working in the real world, they beleive the socialism lite they taught you.
My take. YMMV.
You are intelligent no doubt. But the catch phrases you toss about betray you.
View Quote
like i said, i'm working and following this thread at the same time. i'm not suprised i'm being hackneyed w/ some of my arguments.
let's see if i can sum myself up in a non-socialist lite way (and hopefully this will address DoubleFeed's post as well):
1. less people are needed to do the same amount of work.
2. our population is expanding.
3. new innovation is not producing jobs at the rate it was at the turn of the century. we moved from manufacturing to services and now services to information because the proceeding markets needed fewer and fewer workers. now the emerging markets need very few workers (and highly educated workers to complicate matters).
4. the number of unemployed and underemployed is growing.
5. that group of people *feel* they are entitled to a high standard of living, but are not allowed access to it. this feeling comes from advertising, history, and the general human belief that i deserve what you have cause i'm me.
6. hostility towards our government's inability to address these growing problems (and i'm of the opinion that this was not government's responsibility in the first place) combined w/ envy towards those who still are needed in the workforce will result in lots and lots of good old fashioned violence.
7. anarchy is not desired (i'm arguing this point, but i don't concede it.)
leads me to the conclusion that we must employ everyone that wants a job in order to maintain a stable society... but we can't because of the almighty profit margin.
oh, f*ck it... i brought marshmallows. burn babylon, burn.