Quoted:
Since when is a FWD car with less than 200 HP in a package that weighs over 3000lbs considered a sports car? A V6 mustang has better lbs/hp than that thing. If you insist on FWD, how about a Nissan Spec-V for less money with a better lbs/hp?
Remember, what you spank isn't as important as WHO you spank.
View Quote
Since Merriam Webster defined it as (see link) [url]http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=sports+car[/url]
I see no HP requirement.
The Nissan is cheaper brand spanking new? I would think not. I got the Tiburon for $18.5k, with a $1k rebate. And it's absolutely LOADED for that price.
It would be nice if they got it lighter by 500lb or so. But it's a completely new chassis, instead of borrowing off of one of their other model's chassis. And for me, it's the most powerful car I've owned. (my old Saab 900 Turbo might have been real close, when it ran well)
Also heard the 2005 Tib will have a 3.5L V6 with AWD available. That will be nice to see.
But, you're right about the spanking! [;)]
I love my car. I'll have it at or above 200HP someday. Sister has a Sonata that's three years old, looks and runs like NEW. Her and her hubby drive from Austin to Oklahoma several times a year, so it has decent miles on it. (and neither of them is fat)