Quoted:
Quoted:
Like Steyr Aug, I have also read about Dr. Laura's life behind the scenes, and I think she's a fucking hypocrite.
What do you guys think of that?!?!?!?
View Quote
Well, I want to clarify the word [b]HYPOCRITE[/b]
To me, in my defintion a HYPOCRITE is one who tells you one thing (AT THE PRESENT TIME) and does the complete opposite at that same time.
If Dr Laura is telling people NOT to shack up as she is shacking up with someone at the present time I say YES she is a hypocrite. But she is not doing that.
Have any of you done stuff in the past that you TODAY will never do? I have. Would I go back (if I could) and change it? No. It made me what I am today and helped in designing the maral blueprint of what I am today.
I used to be a flaming liberal that by our standards in here I would have hated me. But PEOPLE DO CHANGE. I was young, naive and stupid. Today I am Old and stupid However I am not Naive. (at least I would think I am not)
I used to be a fan and i did not stop listening to her because she is a hypocrite. I stopped because I got to know what she was going to say before she said it.
BOTTOM LINE: I say if you hate her for your own reasons, thats fine but dont use a word for her when that word (HYPOCRITE) doesnt apply.
View Quote
Ditto to every single sylable you wrote here, Doc.
I think people are throwing the word "hypocrite", and worse, at this woman both incorrectly and for all the wrong reasons.
I will concede the following: Dr. Laura can be WAY to curt with people who don't seem to deserve it. If that makes people think she's a pompous bitch, fine. I can certainly see, and even agree, with that point.
Example: Just this morning I listened to her answer the valid question of a man whose daughter was getting ready (at 19) to marry some kid (21) who she had known for only three weeks. Dr. Laura gave her reply and went STRAIGHT to the next call. Never even bothered to ask the guy if the suggestion would work for him. She just went to the next call. DAMN RUDE, if you ask me...
IMO, THAT is what pisses off A LOT of people who otherwise agree with her.
So like I said, I'll concede that she is, at times, rude and overbearing when the situation doesn't call for it. I've also heard her break down (as I almost did) during a particularly disturbing call where the caller was facing a situation that none of us here would wish on Sarah Brady, leave alone a loved one.
However, just because someone makes mistakes in the past does NOT disqualify them from judging others and letting them know it (especially since it's THEY who call HER).
I've made some mistakes in my life, and I plan on not only preaching to my daughters about them, but also JUDGING them accordingly. Are you suggesting I do otherwise simply because I was young and stupid once, that I let my children suffer or do stupid things because I don't have the right to direct them? RUBBISH!
And as for her being in "inappropriate" spokesman for our views..... I'm afraid that, with all of us being only human, the only "appropriate" spokesman we are left with is Jesus Christ (at least for most of us...), and seeing as He has not yet chosen to come down here Himself for the great everybody-come-as-you-are party He promised, I'm afraid we have to measure the spokesmen we DO have by how they live their lives NOW, and what they are teaching NOW.
I shudder to think how you guys would have treated Saint Paul, or for that matter any of the other great apostles or prophets who, to a man, had failures that would, in your view, disqualify them from performing all the good deeds and teachings they did later. If God could forgive THEM, and accept them as great spokesmen thay were/are, then who the hell am I not to do likewise?
I think Dr. Laura is doing a GREAT job, bitchiness notwithstanding. I think we should be greatful that we (Conservatives) have someone on the radio who is not only standing up for what we all know is RIGHT (regardless of the messenger), but is doing so FORCEFULLY and in a manner that is obviously SO EFFECTIVE that the Left has kittens just when her name is mentioned. The fact that she has a HUGE following (#2 or #3 Radio program, depending where Sean Hannity arrives) proves that more (and more) people are listening to her, and choosing to put aside her past mistakes. They are listening to her for the MESSAGE, and until someone else shows up and is capable of doing the same while attracting and keeping an audience, then the fact that she's human is simply a fault we're all going to have to live with.
Does her delivery need some help? Sure. Does it invalidate her message? NO.
Do we need a better spokesman?
She's one of the top three hottest shows on the Radio, and the Left HATES (and I mean REALLY [b]HATES[/b]) her.
Sounds like she's doing a good job there, too.
Hopefully I've convinced some of you. If not, then I guess we'll have to agree to disagree...