Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 5/14/2003 7:28:19 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 7:36:35 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 7:53:23 PM EDT
This sounds like a call for the ARFCOM army!!
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:05:37 PM EDT
The poll was kinda hard to find... it's on the right side, almost all the way down.
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:07:38 PM EDT
Should President Bush take a higher profile on his support for the ban on semiautomatic weapons? Yes 64% 6894 votes No 36% 3911 votes Total: 10805 votes
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:09:05 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:09:57 PM EDT
Done. 36% for NO. 64% for yes. Chris
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:10:17 PM EDT
Done. Still behind, 36 / 64% Bump for graveyard shift.
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:15:26 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 5/14/2003 8:17:22 PM EDT by AR-15Fan]
Moved to 63%/37% Though I don't see how, they are increasing Yes votes faster than No by my count... I think someone like DU or similar is slamming it as well against us. But I don't guess multiple voting works without clearing cookies and such.
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:16:28 PM EDT
63% are brain dead 37% are correct....
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:22:16 PM EDT
I also noticed that the poll box automatically selects yes unless you change it to no...
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:29:25 PM EDT
Guys its CNN. They dont make laws CONGRESS does. lol
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 8:55:52 PM EDT
were still getting our butts kicked!
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 9:11:26 PM EDT
63% to 37% HAMMER IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 9:15:27 PM EDT
Early and often.
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 9:17:20 PM EDT
Done. Yes 63% 9268 votes No 37% 5452 votes Total: 14720 votes
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 9:23:42 PM EDT
Its been fixed. No way that poll can stay the same as it was when i checked it 3 hours ago and 9 times the votes.
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 9:34:56 PM EDT
It could be that folks might think that he SHOULD take a higher profile position on the AWB in favor of allowing it to sunset. The poll doesn't really speak to his position on the issue one way or the other. It only asks us if we think he should be out in front of it more aggressively regardless of where he might stand.
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 9:56:08 PM EDT
bump. were still losing.
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 10:25:51 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 10:31:41 PM EDT
Yes 63% 11255 votes No 37% 6626 votes Total: 17881 votes
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 10:38:54 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 10:41:41 PM EDT
It's fixed...
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 11:00:58 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/14/2003 11:13:20 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 1:42:40 AM EDT
were still losing this one. I'm starting to think this poll's rigged!
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 2:30:15 AM EDT
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 2:45:58 AM EDT
Created: Wed May 14 20:37:27 EST 2003   Should President Bush take a higher profile on his support for the ban on semiautomatic weapons? Yes   63% 15599 votes No   37% 9231 votes Total: 24830 votes This QuickVote is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of Internet users in general, nor the public as a whole. The QuickVote sponsor is not responsible for content, functionality or the opinions expressed therein.
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 5:13:46 AM EDT
62% yes 38%no 48083 votes
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 5:39:50 AM EDT
done here's the link http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/05/14/bush.gunban/index.html
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 5:41:51 AM EDT
Just voted from a cold link at it jumped from 36% to 38%. DELETE THE HOT LINK!! Guys it is most definitely fixed. I used to work for a market research company that did surveys for for a certain newspaper in a city often referred to with only 2 letters and a certain "charitable trust" that has since changed its name. Well, in 94 they couldn't get the numbers they wanted for the support for the AWB so they had people do what's known in the industry as "rolling numbers". You get a finite amount of sample, and you have to get a minimum # of responses from that sample or your survey is not scientifically valid. Well turns out on a certain question the American people hadn't answered the question to a certain Andy somethings liking. So they took the sample phone #'s added 1 digit and kept calling until they had the data fit the answer. I kept documentation and was going to turn it over to the NRA the following Monday. They broke into my locker and took everything out and assigned it to someone else. Destroyed all my evidence. Without evidence I'm just another conspiracy kook. Woohoo look at my tinfoil hat!!! CNN, Newsweek, LATimes, and NPR have all used data collected by this company. Anybody notice a pattern? Oh, and one of the founders is a charter member of HCI, ran for city council on the single issue of gun control, ran a gun buy back program, got the sale of AW banned with in Chapel Hill city limits, (there aren't even any stores that sell guns in our town any way, he's a hysteric cuz his daddy committed suicide) and alst but not least, he paid for 80% of the guns I now own. Former British Prime Mintister Benjamin Disraeli once said "there are 3 kinds of lies. Lies, damned lies, and statistics". Oh, and liberals are at least twice as likely, if not 5 times as like to participate in surveys as conservatives. Food for thought.
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 6:10:45 AM EDT
Did it last night, before AR15 quit responding. The percentage hasn't changed much, we are loosing.
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 6:14:37 AM EDT
Just hit it at the url VC posted above. http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/05/14/bush.gunban/index.html The number of votes didn't change after I voted. Look at the actual number votes vs. the percentage. I can understand the percentage not changing, but the vote number should increase by one vote after I vote. [BS] Cope
Link Posted: 5/15/2003 8:10:08 AM EDT
This poll is fixed. I voted and the number of votes didn't change.
Top Top