Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 11/24/2002 2:33:03 PM EDT
[#1]
I think it's guaranteed that the AWB will come up on congress.

At the time it comes up the presidential election will be in full swing. The Democratic party position on it will depend on who the presidential candidate is. If they're trying to run a Southern moderate, they'll probably try to downplay it. If Gore is running he'll probably be running left, and support it.

But even if the Democratic nominee is a southern moderate they won't be able to enforce party discipline and keep the AWB from coming to a vote. There are too many democrats that are ideologically motivated, invested in the AWB issue, and from safe Democratic seats. McCarthy, Feinstein, Boxer, and Schumer will be pushing for it regardless of what the party nominee wants.

I'm cautiously optimistic that the issue will at least get kicked down the road until after the election. That will leave a window of a few months for legal purchases, with the ultimate fate of the bill depending on the composition of the congress and the president after the '04 election.

I hope Bushmaster will stock up on flash suppressors and bayonet lugs for the demand that will hit.


Link Posted: 11/24/2002 3:04:34 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
...As you are probably aware, the ban on “assault weapons” and high capacity magazines is set to expire in the fall of 2004...  These “high capacity” magazines are not valuable to criminals; I have read that the average gunfight lasts only three second with three shots fired.

View Quote


I prefer to call "high capacity" magazines "normal capacity" magazines. You play into the wrong side of public perception if you buy the term "high capacity". And what we have now are "reduced capacity" magazines, as evidenced by the goofy mechanical restrictions built into double-stack pistol mags and the like.
Link Posted: 11/24/2002 3:36:25 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
I prefer to call "high capacity" magazines "normal capacity" magazines. You play into the wrong side of public perception if you buy the term "high capacity". And what we have now are "reduced capacity" magazines, as evidenced by the goofy mechanical restrictions built into double-stack pistol mags and the like.
View Quote


[b]DAMN[/b] good point!


He who frames the question wins the debate.

Link Posted: 11/24/2002 3:52:48 PM EDT
[#4]
The antis are organizing and consolidating.  WE need to organize also!  And don't just send a $50 check to the NRA and think that you've done your part.  We all need to get involved in this!

Come join us at [url]www.awbansunset.com[/url]... the unofficial headquarters for fighting the AW Ban!

--Mike
Link Posted: 11/24/2002 6:50:41 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
The antis are organizing and consolidating.  WE need to organize also!  And don't just send a $50 check to the NRA and think that you've done your part.  We all need to get involved in this!

Come join us at [url]www.awbansunset.com[/url]... the unofficial headquarters for fighting the AW Ban!

--Mike
View Quote


Excellent! Just registered as "BradyGoon" [}:D]
Link Posted: 11/24/2002 8:08:20 PM EDT
[#6]
DON'T UNDERESTIMATE THESE FOLKS! THEY AIM TO TAKE YOUR GUNS! This is not a paranoid delusion. They aim to get all of your guns. Join us now, this fight is going to be tough!

[url]http://www.awbansunset.com[/url]
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 10:32:06 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
DON'T UNDERESTIMATE THESE FOLKS! THEY AIM TO TAKE YOUR GUNS! This is not a paranoid delusion. They aim to get all of your guns. Join us now, this fight is going to be tough!

[url]http://www.awbansunset.com[/url]
View Quote


Just joined. Very good idea. We need to make it big and dig in!
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 12:22:52 PM EDT
[#8]
ARGH!!! WHY are the sheeple so [red][size=4]STUPID??[/size=4][/red]

[:(!]
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 12:48:38 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
ARGH!!! WHY are the sheeple so [red][size=4]STUPID??[/size=4][/red]

[:(!]
View Quote


Cuz it's comfortable and requires no input or effort on their part.
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 1:53:05 PM EDT
[#10]
According to [Kristen Rand, legislative director at the Violence Policy Center (VPC)], the Bushmaster .223 includes a feature called a "muzzle brake," which is very similar to a flash suppressor and falls outside the ban. One of the most curious features about the gun is its stock, which looks like a collapsing stock. But it isn't. Why would Bushmaster produce a gun with a fixed stock that looks like a collapsing stock? "To give it the 'look' that sells," Rand said.

"There's a huge market for people who want a gun that looks as close to the military version of that gun as possible and that incorporates as many of these design characteristics, whether they are just cosmetic or they actually function. We believe very strongly that the silhouette and the look of the gun that the sniper chose appeals to people who intend on using it for purposes like what the sniper used it for."
View Quote


I had no idea ignorance this thick was possible.
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 2:17:47 PM EDT
[#11]
[red]The Right to Keep and Bear Arms

REPORT of the SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION

of the

UNITED STATES SENATE
NINETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS

Second Session

February 1982
Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - ------- - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - -

The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms therefore, is a right of the
individual citizen to privately possess and carry in a peaceful manner firearms
and similar arms. Such an "individual rights" interpretation is in full accord
with the history of the right to keep and bear arms, as previously discussed.
It is moreover in accord with contemporaneous statements and formulations
of the right by such founders of this nation as Thomas Jefferson and Samuel Adams,
and accurately reflects the majority of the proposals which led up to the Bill of Rights
itself.

The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the
second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation
by every major commentator and court in the first half century after its ratification,
indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and
carry firearms in a peaceful manner.[/red]
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON: 1982
88-618 0
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents,
U. S. Government Printing Office
Washington, D.C. 20402
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 5:06:54 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Time to break out the "big guns":  Pro RKBA quotes from the icon of all Democrat icons... [b]John F. Kennedy[/b]!!!
View Quote

John F Kennedy was pro-gun? All these years I've hated him for Bay of Pigs and the Cuban Missile Crisis, could there actually be something to like him for?

Didn't his Vice-President (Johnson) sign the GCA of 68?
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 5:40:26 PM EDT
[#13]
I can't believe that these Mental Midgets will use the DC sniper shootings as rationale to renew and toughen the AW ban.  Even if there was no way the sniper could have gotton his hands on a Bushmaster, he would have just used something more appropriate for the job anyway, such as a Remington 700.  Give me a break!
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 5:49:51 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:

John F Kennedy was pro-gun? All these years I've hated him for Bay of Pigs and the Cuban Missile Crisis, could there actually be something to like him for?

View Quote


Remember, NRA Life member John Kennedy was shot by ACLU member Lee Harvey Oswald.

"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."
-John F. Kennedy


"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-John F. Kennedy


"I am pleased to accept Life Membership in the National Rifle Association and extend to your organization every good wish for continued success."
-John F. Kennedy, March 20, 1961


"By calling attention to 'a well regulated militia', the 'security' of the nation, and the right of each citizen 'to keep and bear arms', our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason, I believe the Second Amendment will always be important."
-Senator John F. Kennedy, April 1960
View Quote
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 6:36:44 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:

John F Kennedy was pro-gun? All these years I've hated him for Bay of Pigs
View Quote


Why? Because the CIA went behind his back and as 'Commander in Chief' he called them on it?


...and the Cuban Missile Crisis,
View Quote


"The other guy blinked" and we won that one. What sort of threat has Cuba been since? So we traded off a few outdated missles in Turkey. The alternative could have been much, much worse if JFK had listened to his generals.

could there actually be something to like him for?
View Quote


JFK is one of the very few Democrats I respect. I was pretty young back during his administration, but he did convey a certain quality, inspiration and leadership that is so sorrily lacking today. I find it distressing that Teddy came from the same sperm cell.
Link Posted: 11/25/2002 9:49:53 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
The antis are organizing and consolidating.  WE need to organize also!  And don't just send a $50 check to the NRA and think that you've done your part.  We all need to get involved in this!

Come join us at [url]www.awbansunset.com[/url]... the unofficial headquarters for fighting the AW Ban!

--Mike
View Quote


The link isn't working for me...  Says not found.
Link Posted: 11/26/2002 12:35:12 AM EDT
[#17]
Link Posted: 11/26/2002 1:18:04 AM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
[url]www.controlthis.org[/url] is the mirror site.  awbansunset is down for a while for upgrades.
View Quote


Yes, thank you for pointing this out... due to a slight hosting rearrangement, www.awbansunset.com will not work for a few days.

--Mike
Link Posted: 11/26/2002 6:27:01 AM EDT
[#19]
One important question is what the NRA is going to do.  Yes, they have doubled their membership, but that increases the likelihood that they are willing to compromise.  Although there is strength in numbers, larger political actors tend to become co-opted; if public opinion, as reported by liberal media, remains anti-gun, then the NRA, in its quest to mobilize resources for self-survival and organizational growth (the two most important goals of ANY organization), will probably compromise.  Political science literature suggests again and again that as organizations grow, they become part of the "system" and, thus, less likely to fight that same system that allowed them to grow and prosper.
So, I do not believe that the NRA will be a valuably ally.  I like the Internet-based activism idea advocated by others.  Let's create informal networks, let's contact our lawmakers, let's contact the media.  Grass-roots activism can work!  If that fat liberal Michael Moore can get K-Mart to stop carrying handgun ammo, then millions of law-abiding gun owners should have some influence, too!  With or without the NRA.
Link Posted: 11/26/2002 8:16:10 PM EDT
[#20]
Quoted:
Remember, NRA Life member John Kennedy was shot by ACLU member Lee Harvey Oswald.
View Quote

LOL!! Never knew Oswald was an ACLU member. Learn something new every day...

Quoted:
Quoted:
John F Kennedy was pro-gun? All these years I've hated him for Bay of Pigs

Why? Because the CIA went behind his back and as 'Commander in Chief' he called them on it?

...and the Cuban Missile Crisis,

"The other guy blinked" and we won that one. What sort of threat has Cuba been since? So we traded off a few outdated missles in Turkey. The alternative could have been much, much worse if JFK had listened to his generals.
View Quote

Yes we won that one but had Kennedy not pulled the air support from BoP there would have been no missile crisis and Cubans would have been free of a Communist dictator for 41 years.

Not that future Presidents have learned from Kennedy's blunder: Bush Sr did the same thing to the Kurds leading to the current Iraqi mess.
JFK is one of the very few Democrats I respect. I was pretty young back during his administration, but he did convey a certain quality, inspiration and leadership that is so sorrily lacking today. I find it distressing that Teddy came from the same sperm cell.
View Quote

What about Robert Kennedy? His daughter (Catherine who lost to Erlich in MA gov race) certainly follows Ted's socialist roots. What about JFK's son, the guy who died in a plane crash a few years ago? There doesn't seem to be ANY pro-gun Democrats running for President for the last 40 years.
Quoted:
One important question is what the NRA is going to do.  Yes, they have doubled their membership, but that increases the likelihood that they are willing to compromise.
[snip]
So, I do not believe that the NRA will be a valuably ally.  I like the Internet-based activism idea advocated by others.  Let's create informal networks, let's contact our lawmakers, let's contact the media.  Grass-roots activism can work!  If that fat liberal Michael Moore can get K-Mart to stop carrying handgun ammo, then millions of law-abiding gun owners should have some influence, too!  With or without the NRA.
View Quote

I too am still waiting to see what the NRA will do, they have made a statement that they will work against the ban but as yet no evidence of them actually doing anything.

There are lots of us who will not join the NRA until we see their muscle moving against a new AW ban. If there is no lobbying and / or there is compromise then the NRA will never see a penny of my money.
Link Posted: 11/26/2002 8:33:34 PM EDT
[#21]
Posted By Kroagnon:
I too am still waiting to see what the NRA will do, they have made a statement that they will work against the ban but as yet no evidence of them actually doing anything.

There are lots of us who will not join the NRA until we see their muscle moving against a new AW ban. If there is no lobbying and / or there is compromise then the NRA will never see a penny of my money.
View Quote


FYI : [url]http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=111826&w=searchPop[/url]

Ashcroft Takes on [b]NRA[/b] in Assault-Weap. Case

^
[size=1]^
[url]www.Cures-not-wars.org/[/url] Truth Will Liberate Earth.
[url]www.RKBA.org/antis/hci-master[/url]Allege 1993 feinstein/hci master plan
PRETEXT for TOTAL Gun Freedom Confiscation Dis-Armament.
[b]BAN[/b] [url]http://www.DigitalAngel.net/[/url]Revelation 13:18  ID-GPS-MONEY Human Implant Micro-chip

Never Again, Never Forget
Seek the Truth , Liberate Your Mind
We Are At WAR
[/size=1]
FIXED BAYONETS

VX
Link Posted: 11/26/2002 9:31:44 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
FYI : [url]http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=111826&w=searchPop[/url]
Ashcroft Takes on [b]NRA[/b] in Assault-Weap. Case
View Quote

This is totally irrelevant to the real issue, that being making sure the current AW ban dies on expire date and no new ban gets passed in its place. Where's the NRA there? Nowhere to be seen, as usual.

We Are At WAR
View Quote

We are [b]not[/b] at war. Congress has not declared war. There is no Secretary of War. The President cannot declare war (though he certainly has unofficially declared war on our liberties as free Americans).
Link Posted: 11/26/2002 10:29:22 PM EDT
[#23]
posted by Kroagnon:
We are not at war.
View Quote


We are at War.  
Sept. 12, 2001, GWB.

Willfully Wishing .
^
[size=1]^
[url]www.Cures-not-wars.org/[/url] Truth Will Liberate Earth.
[url]www.RKBA.org/antis/hci-master[/url]Allege 1993 feinstein/hci master plan
PRETEXT for TOTAL Gun Freedom Confiscation Dis-Armament.
[b]BAN[/b][url]http://www.DigitalAngel.net/[/url]Revelation 13:18  ID-GPS-MONEY Human Implant Micro-chip

Never Again, Never Forget
Seek the Truth , Liberate Your Mind
We Are At WAR
[/size=1]
FIXED BAYONETS

VX
Link Posted: 11/27/2002 9:33:54 AM EDT
[#24]
DON'T UNDERESTIMATE THESE FOLKS! THEY AIM TO TAKE YOUR GUNS! This is not a paranoid delusion. They aim to get all of your guns. Join us now, this fight is going to be tough!

[url]www.awbansunset.com[/url]
Link Posted: 11/30/2002 12:28:08 AM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
Keep in mind that most gun folks still see AWs as expendable to keep their glocks and brownings.  For every 1 AW supporter the'll lose, they dont alienate 5 soccer moms who voted Republican for the first time.
View Quote


And how many of those Glock owners wouldn't like to see cheap hi-cap mags available again?  Regardless of what happens, good or bad, the ban won't be the same.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top