[url]http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/749914/posts?page=9[/url]
He dragged his wife from the 'abortion' clinic and in the process his older son was slightly injured...He was charged with 'endangering the welfare of a child'...

lets not get into that abortion/anti-abortion line again... very widley differse and sure of starting a flamewar.

Yeah, issues of Life and Death have a way of doing that.[IMG]http://www.gamers-forums.com/smilies/contrib/corky/smilies23.gif[/IMG]

[url]http://www.full-auto.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=002116[/url]

 [img]http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/sadness.gif[/img]

Just goes to show what "abortion rights" is really all about: [b]power over men[/b].

Don't think so? Let's see.

a) If a woman gets pregnant and decides to have an abortion, but the father [b]doesn't[/b] want the abortion to occur, he's screwed, despite the fact the baby is equally his and the woman is equally responsible for the pregnancy.

b) If a woman gets pregnant and decides [b]NOT[/b] to have an abortion, but the father [b]does[/b] want the abortion to occur, he's screwed, despite the fact the woman can make such a call unilaterally (see above).

Either way, the man's screwed...

Q.E.D.

Instances of rape and incest are, of course, exceptions. Distasteful exceptions to be sure, but exceptions nonetheless.

[sarcasm on]
Uh oh....beware speaking on anything regarding 'fathers rights'. You're nothing but a supporter of rapists and deadbeat dads!
[sarcasm off]

It's funny, but it seems abortion rights might shape up to be the hot-button topic in the NJ senate race between Forrester and the Torch. Or, at least that's the one topic the Torch keeps hammering on Forrester with. The one general question I do have is this: Torricelli keeps attacking Forrester over his opposition to federal funding on abortion. He spins it, saying that that would 'deny many of our armed servicewomen their basic right to choose, since their medical coverage is provided by the government'. Could someone explain to me if this is correct?

Hell, if current legal trends continue as they have, within ten years the definition of fatherhood will be little more than 'open wallet'. You won't sign a marriage contract so much as sign away your bank account. Sad, really.

If the man could carry the baby himself then fine he can decide as well and just transfer the fetus to hiim. until them men are screwed. because it biologally and phycollagical affects a woman. if she is not ready for it she shouldnt be forced to carry it through, granted she shouldnt have sex either since pregnancy is a real possiblity even if all precations are taken.