James Michael Mullis,

         Plaintiff-Appellee,

         v.

United States of America,

         Defendant-Appellant.

Sixth Circuit Decision  No. 99-6312


The first five pages are...blah...blah...federal felon for "falsifying travel expenses in connection with his business"...wants guns...applied to BATF under federal law to own again....blah...F Troop don't want to process apps even though under law they should because congress won't pay them for it....blah...the circuit joins all the other left wing overmaster liberal anti-gun judges and decide the ATF can do what they want...blah...the guy can't appeal whatever F Troop wants to do....blah...

Then they dispose of the Plaintiff's claims that his right to keep and bear arms is a civil right and thus must be heard in the courts as follows:

"While plaintiff's complaint also refers to restoration of his civil rights, it is clear that his right to bear arms is the only right sought."

Anyone spot the problem here in the sixth? (Court motto: "We hate America, the constitution, and all that is good more than the ninth ever did!")

This kind of stuff is why I know America will stop being America in the next 50 years.

[url]http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=00a0371p.06[/url]

BTT now that the mod/race fight seems to be over.