User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/24/2002 3:36:02 PM EDT
[#1]
It would have global implications no matter where it hit. But of course we can always fantasize.[:D]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2002 3:41:12 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted: [url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2147879.stm[/url] The question should be.. Can we divert it to hit IRAQ |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2002 3:45:43 PM EDT
[#3]
Anybody else annoyed at the attitude of this "scientist?"
However, Dr Peiser was keen to point out that future observations could change the situation. He said: "This unique event should not diminish the fact that additional observations in coming weeks will almost certainly - we hope - eliminate the current threat." Uhh, dude, I got news for you--if additional observations shows the thing isn't going to hit the earth, you haven't "eliminated the threat" you were just initially wrong. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
