Quoted:
Rail lines are AWESOME for moving bulk freight, and terrible for moving people! Only those driven by romantic nostalga believe that trains are a viable passenger alternative. It was no coincidence or conspiracy that when an alternative came along, people abandoned trains.
View Quote
Really? When was the last time you've been to Europe? Japan?
The problem was and still is with Amtrak that the government wants something for nothing. Make a profit, but don't spend the necessary cash on infrastructure. It is established that where they do, they can turn a profit.
And if you are bitching that your hard earned tax dollars are being wasted on Amtrak, how much do the feds spend on airports and highways annually? (Oh, don't forget the FAA and air traffic control) More than on Amtrak.
This isn't nostalgia, but fact. Per person, it costs less to move by train, but the feds hamstring rail travel left and right, while they continue to subsidize less efficient forms of travel through new and repaired roads, airport subsidies, and an entire administration that is paid for by tax payers.
Edited to add: Hell, I forgot the non associated costs of air pollution from auto travel. Unless of course you like choking in LA rushhour traffic on endless ribbons of concrete.