Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
3/20/2017 5:03:23 PM
Posted: 6/16/2002 7:08:03 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/16/2002 7:29:26 PM EDT by Gloftoe]
Link Posted: 6/16/2002 7:15:48 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/16/2002 7:17:53 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/16/2002 7:21:42 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/16/2002 7:23:27 PM EDT
i wonder if the government said they were a monopoly and so they said fine s c r e w you.
Link Posted: 6/16/2002 7:27:57 PM EDT
I bet it has something to do with the government not paying their bills in a timely manner.
Link Posted: 6/16/2002 7:29:00 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/16/2002 7:40:02 PM EDT
I believe it has to do with the fact that the company DOES NOT want to have to comply with the racial, sexual and other hiring quotas and myriad laws the US Government enforce on contractors to comply with who do business with them. They could conceivably be open to fed lawsuits for improper compliance with equal opportunity workforce laws if they are deemed a "Federal Contractor".
Link Posted: 6/16/2002 7:43:43 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Gloftoe:
Originally Posted By DnPRK: I bet it has something to do with the government not paying their bills in a timely manner.
View Quote
The part that gets me, is they're refusing CASH transactions as well.
View Quote
That's easy: the signatures on the $100 bill and the printed receipt don't match ;)
Top Top