Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 4
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 9:59:11 AM EDT
[#1]
this thread needs a poll... when is it okay to shoot dirty hippies?







Link Posted: 10/28/2011 10:02:25 AM EDT
[#2]
No doubt there are crooked LEOs.

Ummm but just shooting them because you think they are a threat should (and probably will) get you a date with a gurney and a needle.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 10:06:10 AM EDT
[#3]
Worst flier ever.



More like a short essay.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 10:19:15 AM EDT
[#4]
I thought about posting, then I thought better of it.  This is going to be a disaster no matter how you cut it.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 10:27:16 AM EDT
[#5]
Funny how the author say's look at Pol Pot, Mao, Hitler etc. All of them socialist and communists just like the OWS crowd. Ironic.
Also his assertion that the cops denying him his rights should be shot, can also lead me to the conclusion that communists and socialists wanting to steal my $$, by his logic, could be shot also.
These folks better be careful, when they shoot a cop they might find that they are suddenly going to be "oppressed" by the real 99%. The cops will have to save them from the public.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 10:32:58 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I wouldn't just blame left wingers for this.  There's plenty of right wingers here who have similar feelings.


It is sometimes legal and moral to shoot policemen, even when they are on duty and in uniform.


The Supreme Court agreed with this in a case several (100-ish?) years ago.  I can't remember the name of the case, I have searched but can't find it, if anyone can, let me know because I don't remember any of the important details and I'd like to read up on it again.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 10:38:29 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I wouldn't just blame left wingers for this.  There's plenty of right wingers here who have similar feelings.


It is sometimes legal and moral to shoot policemen, even when they are on duty and in uniform.


The Supreme Court agreed with this in a case several (100-ish?) years ago.  I can't remember the name of the case, I have searched but can't find it, if anyone can, let me know because I don't remember any of the important details and I'd like to read up on it again.



I'm guessing the governent was found in the wrong and police officer was a "state actor"?

Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:21:08 AM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I wouldn't just blame left wingers for this.  There's plenty of right wingers here who have similar feelings.


It is sometimes legal and moral to shoot policemen, even when they are on duty and in uniform.


The Supreme Court agreed with this in a case several (100-ish?) years ago.  I can't remember the name of the case, I have searched but can't find it, if anyone can, let me know because I don't remember any of the important details and I'd like to read up on it again.



I'm guessing the governent was found in the wrong and police officer was a "state actor"?



That sounds right.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:22:52 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
Quoted:
According to very recent case law, we no longer have the right to self defense if in a confrontation with a police officer.

Know your place, serf.


pick up that can..


I threw it in his face! (And then ran like a lil bitch out into the square)
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:36:32 AM EDT
[#10]
I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy.  
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:37:59 AM EDT
[#11]
These have to be the dumbest mutherfuckers on the face of the planet.  They're trying to bring about the exact kind of government they warn about in their fact challenged flyer.



I think "Idiocracy" was a optimistic view of today's society. In reality it's far worse.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:41:48 AM EDT
[#12]
Great "flyer" if read without visions of smelly hippies dancing in your head.

I'm not sure it came from one of "them" at all.



And how has this thread managed to avoid degenerating into the usual stupidity?

Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:41:50 AM EDT
[#13]
So glad I am issued an M4.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:49:26 AM EDT
[#14]



Quoted:


I thought about posting, then I thought better of it.  This is going to be a disaster no matter how you cut it.


aaah-yup.  Right there with you.  


Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:54:19 AM EDT
[#15]
I'll shoot anyone who is trying to kill me.  Other than that, no...

I guess it would be illegal for me to do so if I did something felonious to start that sequence of events in motion, but I don't do such things, so that doesn't apply to me.

If a cop is trying to kill me... well I guess I'll either be dead or defending myself in court.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 11:58:15 AM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
this thread needs a poll... when is it okay to shoot dirty hippies?









Always!  As long as they're rubber bullets.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 12:06:03 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:

And how has this thread managed to avoid degenerating into the usual stupidity?



Give it a bit.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 12:09:00 PM EDT
[#18]
This thread is going to go well. I just know it.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 12:14:59 PM EDT
[#19]
IN is all I have
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 12:18:37 PM EDT
[#20]



Quoted:


I am not touching this with my ten foot pole, all I am going to say is that people committing violent felonies should be met with lethal force as the law already allows.


[Devil's Advocate]

Even when the people committing the violent felonies are LE?

[/Devil's Advocate]



 
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:00:56 PM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
So glad I am issued an M4.


So glad I don't have to go to the arms room to get mine.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:04:21 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
No doubt there are crooked LEOs.

Ummm but just shooting them because you think they are a threat should (and probably will) get you a date with a gurney and a needle.


this, unless you got some solid facts backing your case up
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:12:24 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
According to very recent case law, we no longer have the right to self defense if in a confrontation with a police officer.

Know your place, serf.


pick up that can..


Vote YES on Issue 2.


Huge +1 to that
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:12:54 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I wouldn't just blame left wingers for this.  There's plenty of right wingers here who have similar feelings.


It is sometimes legal and moral to shoot policemen, even when they are on duty and in uniform. The chances that that fact is in any way relevant to a bunch of bacteria-laden walking patchouli dispensers are minimal.


"We are always right, they are always wrong, even if they're saying the same stuff I have said".



When we start occupy private property, trespassing, shitting on police cars, and throwing shit at cops you can make that statement. Until then you are comparing people who gathered to protest government and then went home in an orderly fashion causing no damage, leaving no garbage strew about, and having had no supporters arrested, pepper sprayed, or otherwise throttled by LE. There is a comparison that doesn't hold up.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:15:05 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
Sounds like an organization need to be deemed a terrorist group and dealt with accordingly.............


Let Old Man Winter sort this assholes out. Save the cops some lawsuits, injuries, tetenus shots, and rabbie vaccinations.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:26:09 PM EDT
[#26]
I feel like this is a strange triangle of he's not on my side but he's on my side while he's on my side he's not on my side.  

You have "us" who sympathize with a small handful of things from OWS, but not with others, but particularly with the enforcement arm of .gov.  At the same time the dislike of OWS "lazy hippies" turns into support for the enforcement arm of .gov.  The police then support "us" because we work and aren't lazy, but at the same time will deny our rights just as they do to OWS.  So then "we" in turn dislike the police because of that, but like the other aspects of stability they provide.  So then in turn OWS dislike us for support the .gov and wanting to stomp all over OWS.  

I think I got it figured out...but....

My mind is so full of fuck, I hope yours is too after reading this!
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:39:58 PM EDT
[#27]
Funny how much in common many GD posters have with the OWS crowd.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:42:00 PM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
Funny how much in common many GD posters have with the OWS crowd.


Feel free to expand upon your thoughts.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:44:49 PM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Funny how much in common many GD posters have with the OWS crowd.


Feel free to expand upon your thoughts.


Please.  I am interested in your insight as well.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:45:58 PM EDT
[#30]



Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:

Funny how much in common many GD posters have with the OWS crowd.




Feel free to expand upon your thoughts.




Please.  I am interested in your insight as well.


I am sure that they will be very...... enlightening

 
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:46:45 PM EDT
[#31]
Lets take a step back, shall we?



Everyone, from every part of the political spectrum is pissed off.



First, these are the same people that rallied against Bush and voted for Obama. He was supposed to be their savior, change the structure of the .gov, make life fair, and things would be fine again.



The tea parties rallied, stuck to the letter of the law, even picked up their trash, took a few seats in Congress and was demonized for trying to stop the spending that their "savior" was touting as the way to fix the economy and put the common man back on his feet. OWSers think that the tea parties were trying to stop spending to fuck the little guy and help the rich, which is 100% backwards.



These kids watched all of this happen, except they watched it happen on MSNBC or ABC, where cries of "Koch brothers" and "tax cuts for the richest" filled their heads.



They were still not disenchanted with Obama or big .gov when the tea parties were demonized daily.



Unless you are in a local tea party, a 9.12er or sceptically watch Fox News your mind has been filled with HATE and CONTEMPT for the tea parties and their advocacy of less government, less spending, and lower taxes.



Fast forward a couple years....



Now these kids have seen that Obama is a sham, a fraud, bought and paid for, corrupt, and bankrupting their future at a lightning pace to maintain the status quo as well as paying off his banker and union friends.



They disagree with bailouts, not only seeing it as corruption, illegal as fuck, and a GIANT moral hazard, but also as undue influence on the .gov by industry lobbyists rearing it's head once again.



They disagree with decade long wars that have turned into PR campaigns and nation building, all of it being charged to the taxpayer tab.



The list goes on and on, but suffice to say they are generally pissed off at what has been done in their name and charged to a tab that they will have to pay back.



In short, taxation without representation.





Instead of Obama fixing it, he made it worse. Now they are pissed and they took a look at how quietly the tea parties went away once they were got a little sliver of power in the machine.



OWS decided that civil disobedience is the best path to highlighting how fucked up things are.



No permits, no permission, no surrender.



They fully expect this to come to violence, like it did in Oakland. And they fully expect that as it gets more and more violent they will be able to highlight that the only way this .gov can hold it's extra-constitutional powers is through brute force.



Many of these people are indeed "useful idiots" who've been duped into thinking that Socialism means "power for and by the people".  They can't see how our current system EVER worked for the people.



Remember these college kids were born in the 90's.



What they need is to hear differing viewpoints. From people other than tenured professors. And not filtered through media.



Now....





When is okay to shoot a cop? When they trample your unalienable rights in the name of an extra-constitutional government drunk on power and debt.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:56:30 PM EDT
[#32]
Shoot a police officer around here and you'll either a.) be turned into
Swiss cheese or b.) on the fast track to have a needle in the arm.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:56:56 PM EDT
[#33]
Needs more hickory shampoo...
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:58:26 PM EDT
[#34]
And I'll play two-way range with some hippy if they decide to play that game.  I'm your huckleberry.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 1:58:33 PM EDT
[#35]
Meh, bring it.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:00:37 PM EDT
[#36]
I'm going to go out on a limb here, but having actually read the flyer and the article I'm having trouble finding things that are wholly wrong. It makes a very clean and ideologically congruent arguement and I think it would be difficult to refute. If you believe in the Second Ammendment, then you beleive that at some point it's ok to resist tyranny by government and it's agents with physical violence, and ultimately that's the point the article makes. It's is however very over the top and arguebly too specific in the language it uses, but it is a fyler so it has to be attention grabbing to get folks to read it. Also, when considering the language used it's impotant to remember the target audience. Certain concepts are better understood if they are framed in a context that the audience can easily understand.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:00:42 PM EDT
[#37]
Quoted:
Lets take a step back, shall we?

Everyone, from every part of the political spectrum is pissed off.

First, these are the same people that rallied against Bush and voted for Obama. He was supposed to be their savior, change the structure of the .gov, make life fair, and things would be fine again.

The tea parties rallied, stuck to the letter of the law, even picked up their trash, took a few seats in Congress and was demonized for trying to stop the spending that their "savior" was touting as the way to fix the economy and put the common man back on his feet. OWSers think that the tea parties were trying to stop spending to fuck the little guy and help the rich, which is 100% backwards.

These kids watched all of this happen, except they watched it happen on MSNBC or ABC, where cries of "Koch brothers" and "tax cuts for the richest" filled their heads.

They were still not disenchanted with Obama or big .gov when the tea parties were demonized daily.

Unless you are in a local tea party, a 9.12er or sceptically watch Fox News your mind has been filled with HATE and CONTEMPT for the tea parties and their advocacy of less government, less spending, and lower taxes.

Fast forward a couple years....

Now these kids have seen that Obama is a sham, a fraud, bought and paid for, corrupt, and bankrupting their future at a lightning pace to maintain the status quo as well as paying off his banker and union friends.

They disagree with bailouts, not only seeing it as corruption, illegal as fuck, and a GIANT moral hazard, but also as undue influence on the .gov by industry lobbyists rearing it's head once again.

They disagree with decade long wars that have turned into PR campaigns and nation building, all of it being charged to the taxpayer tab.

The list goes on and on, but suffice to say they are generally pissed off at what has been done in their name and charged to a tab that they will have to pay back.

In short, taxation without representation.


Instead of Obama fixing it, he made it worse. Now they are pissed and they took a look at how quietly the tea parties went away once they were got a little sliver of power in the machine.

OWS decided that civil disobedience is the best path to highlighting how fucked up things are.

No permits, no permission, no surrender.

They fully expect this to come to violence, like it did in Oakland. And they fully expect that as it gets more and more violent they will be able to highlight that the only way this .gov can hold it's extra-constitutional powers is through brute force.

Many of these people are indeed "useful idiots" who've been duped into thinking that Socialism means "power for and by the people".  They can't see how our current system EVER worked for the people.

Remember these college kids were born in the 90's.

What they need is to hear differing viewpoints. From people other than tenured professors. And not filtered through media.

Now....


When is okay to shoot a cop? When they trample your unalienable rights in the name of an extra-constitutional government drunk on power and debt.


Not bad, but you left the trail a bit when you talked about them being mad at Obama...they are focusing their anger and lawlessness against businesses; not the government that screwed them and created this mess.  They are being uses by the likes of piven and ayers to further the socialist cause; aided and abetted by the very government officials that helped create this mess.  In addition, the MSM is complicit in the situation along with the major unions that are getting ready to join in.

They are not 99%, they're the useful idiots for those attempting to overthrow our form of government and create the next socialist utopia.  And they think it's a good thing because that is what they have been taught.  Nevermind the millions that usually die when the socialists get into power...usually by starting to clear out the useful idiots that got them there.

Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:03:46 PM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
I am not touching this with my ten foot pole, all I am going to say is that people committing violent felonies should be met with lethal force as the law already allows.


Not in Indiana apparently.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:06:17 PM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:
Sounds like an organization need to be deemed a terrorist group and dealt with accordingly.............


That's a terrible thing to say about the Oakland police dept.

You could get banned for that.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:07:50 PM EDT
[#40]
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:09:19 PM EDT
[#41]
Quoted:

Quoted:
I am not touching this with my ten foot pole, all I am going to say is that people committing violent felonies should be met with lethal force as the law already allows.

[Devil's Advocate]
Even when the people committing the violent felonies are LE?
[/Devil's Advocate]
 


<snicker>  
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:13:12 PM EDT
[#42]
Quoted:
Meh, bring it.




Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:15:43 PM EDT
[#43]
This flier wasn't by any chance printed on WarriorTalk stationary, was it?




Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:17:17 PM EDT
[#44]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Meh, bring it.




Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:21:25 PM EDT
[#45]
Quoted:
This is a repost, but it's appropriate for this thread:

Let me tell you about a group of American patriots who decided enough was enough in regards to nonsense firearms restrictions placed upon us by the government.

The Governor of Massachusetts passed a law supported by the legislature to ban the ownership of ammunition storage / caches. The restrictions also banned the collection of firearms in communities which may represent "militia activism."

This action failed to deter the patriotic people of Northern Massachusetts. They amassed stores of ammunition and arms all around their rural communities. They stocked their farm houses, personal properties and barns with arms and ammunition. The Governor be damned.

When the Governor learned of this defiance, he dispatched the State Police to arrest the so-called criminals and confiscate their arms and ammunition. He didn't want the media alerted, so he conducted his plan secretly. A large group of State Police were dispatched in the middle of April. However, their secret job was not so secret. A behind-the-scenes patriot from Boston learned about the Governor's plan and warned the citizens in danger about the approaching police force. The citizens reacted immediately and amassed along the governor's expected route, waited for the police's arrival then shot them to hell in an amazing shoot out.

It was an historic victory for the patriots of northern Massachusetts. The fight went on to be known as the battles of Lexington and Concord. The citizenry were warned by a fellow named Paul Revere.

Remember where your freedoms were earned. Remember who earned them. Realize they were people not unlike yourself
.


I'd hardly compare the OWS chuckleheads to our founding fathers , but I dont think that's what Hondaciv was trying to do .

Regardless


http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1237669_There_are_Americans_who_don_t_tolerate_governmental_gun_restrictions.html

http://www.arrse.co.uk/us/170397-exacting-response-harsh-gun-restrictions-united-states.html
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:22:51 PM EDT
[#46]



Quoted:



Quoted:







Not bad, but you left the trail a bit when you talked about them being mad at Obama...they are focusing their anger and lawlessness against businesses; not the government that screwed them and created this mess.  They are being uses by the likes of piven and ayers to further the socialist cause; aided and abetted by the very government officials that helped create this mess.  In addition, the MSM is complicit in the situation along with the major unions that are getting ready to join in.



They are not 99%, they're the useful idiots for those attempting to overthrow our form of government and create the next socialist utopia.  And they think it's a good thing because that is what they have been taught.  Nevermind the millions that usually die when the socialists get into power...usually by starting to clear out the useful idiots that got them there.





Many many moving parts. I've highlighted the behind the scenes stuff and that thread died quickly.



http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1242625_Found__Source_of_Occupy_Wall_Street.html



 
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:29:35 PM EDT
[#47]



Quoted:


Who was the person saying they needed another Kent state? And why does that come to mind with another article about audio taken from the event when analyzed determined the first shot fired at kent state university was from a .380 handgun...
It was analyzed by a dude who came to that conclusion, it's not like that it's been established as fact.....





 
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:31:40 PM EDT
[#48]
Quoted:
Unalienable Rights are Rights granted by the Creator and cannot be given up or taken.
Inalienable Rights are Rights that you can give up or forfeit.

The only problem is, If the Gov't doesn't recognize a Creator then Unalienable doesn't exist.


According to my Merriam-Webster dictionary both of the above words mean the same thing. The "Un" version comes from the early 1600s.

ETA:
Definition
incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:32:15 PM EDT
[#49]
I don't know where you guys get the idea these guys are unarmed.  The truth is, they have access to guns just like anyone else.

The SLA, Weathermen and Black Panthers ring a bell?

I realize this is GD's #2 wet dream, but I'll tell you one thing, I don't care what side of the political spectrum you are on, you shoot a cop in my presence and this old retired headshrinker is going to blow your head off.
Link Posted: 10/28/2011 2:34:11 PM EDT
[#50]
By a happy coincidence I bought a new Armalite M15M4C today.
The two of us say, bring it hippies
Page / 4
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top