Quoted:
Like I said the first time, if you want to know what happened either ask a Mormon or do independent research. The link was just my way of offering what happened there in my opinion If I wanted to know what [red]happend[/red], I would go to the source and not to some third-hand, fourth-generation yarn spinner who has an axe to grind.
View Quote
And you don't think that the official history of the Mormon church has an axe to grind?
There is no such thing as a [red]unimpeachibly[/red] neutral & independent source when it comes to history-there are always at least two sides to every story, and those sides have conflicting points of view.
View Quote
Actually, I see it as three sides:
The two "truths" told by those involved and the truth that neither of them will admit to.
If you do not have skin in this [red]arguement[/red], why are you still here?
View Quote
What are you trying to say? That I need permission to take part in a discussion that doesn't directly effect me? I'm still here because I'm being addressed, aren't I?
Skeptic is spelled with a K Jarhead!
View Quote
From [url]www.merriam-webster.com[/url]:
One entry found for sceptic, sceptical, scepticism.
Main Entry: scep·tic, scep·ti·cal, scep·ti·cism
variant of SKEPTIC, SKEPTICAL, SKEPTICISM
By the way, [red][b]happend[/b][/red] is spelled with an 'e' there in between the 'n' and the 'd,' [red][b]unimpeachibly[/b][/red] is spelled unimpeachably, and [b][red]arguement[/red][/b] is spelled argument, but thanks just the same.