I'm served on a professional school admissions committee for a public university. Interestingly, we've done away with race criteria for what was obviously preferential admissions. Although we still can use terms such as "underserved communities" as a consideration, since we do need to try to make health care available to all the public, the ethnic background is no longer a valid criterion for establishing "special consideration."
Our committee is filled with University-type liberals, moderates and closet conservatives that must use the liberal language, and so-called minorities such as myself who simply do not believe in hyphenated Americans. Americans are Americans, period. I just cannot see anything fair about affirmative action or it's thinly disguised successor "special consideration for underserved communities."
We still have some problems. One of my favorite problems invented by our liberal leanings (I'm in California, afterall) is that we cannot discriminate against people with learning disorders.... slow learners who were diagnosed by some Berkeley group as just having a learning disorder, so they need to take examinations all by themselves in a special room and with more time allotted. Now, since we are cranking out people who will be able to provide surgical intervention, I would think that a slow learner may be contraindicated. But no.
My advice to you is to go to Berkeley. Get some PhD there to say you have a learning disorder (after all, this means more Federal $$$ for the research group of the PhD, who can tell funding agencies that such learning disorders are far more serious a problem than previously estimated). You won't be wait-listed anywhere, with that strategy!! Edit -- you'll be accepted, straight-up!