Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe a private space agency should be formed and supported by investments, donations and the selling of shares. Private industry is almost always more efficient than government.
I think that Branson billionaire dude is doing something in that regard. He's calling it Virgin Global or soemthing like that. I think tickets are $100,000+ per person too.
But... to me its sad. My brother was working in Houston for a NASA Contractor on the Intl Space Station ISS - Lunar Module division. When he said "Lunar Module", I asked him to repeat what he said, then I asked him if he knew what that means. Of course he did - we were designing a missionand a ship to take us to the Moon again.
Then AIG, Wall Street, and the world's biggest banks collapsed, not to mention Hurricane IKE. Nearly everyboyd on the ISS - Lunar Module group was laid off in a few short months. Last I heard is that NASA's Houston Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center is laying off 5000+ NASA engineers, scientists, and workers once the Space Shuttle Missions end.
I think that says something about where we are, not just the "Space Race", but versus other countries and cultures.
We're losing ground.
Lets say you're the owner of two companies. One company produces products for the civilian market, another produces products for the military. Both products do roughly the same thing. The military version of the product however, is 50 years ahead of the civilian version, costs less money to produce and performs better and lasts longer, but the science and technology behind it is classified. Now, lets say the cost to produce and improve upon an inferior system goes up drastically in a short amount of time. Lets say the public loses interest in the product, but the military version continues to be utilized and improved upon. Lets say it costs more to research ways to improve upon an already obsolete technology when the superior technology already exists and is relatively perfected, and has been for some time. What would you do? I sure as hell wouldn't continue to waste time, manpower and money on a project which is entirely based on obsolete technology and junk science. NASA is and always has been a gigantic psychological operation meant to instill a false sense of technological advancement (or lack-thereof). It was never meant to be the vessel by which we explore our solar system and the galaxy. Something will replace that exploratory essence of its operation in time, and using technology that will allow us to see and do more in space than we ever thought would be possible in our lifetimes.
I don't think we're losing ground. I think we're preparing for a fundamental change in the level of technology we assume humanity is capable of. Those technologies involved in the military space agendas are and will be available to all of us
eventually. They will revolutionize communication, medicine, and most significantly.. propulsion and power generation. If NASA has to bite the dust in the mean time I'm all for it.