Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Posted: 9/11/2010 9:20:24 PM EDT
If there was no law against owning full autos, no tax, no registration, no forms, nothing not even state laws how many here would convert all or at least most of thier guns back to the originally planed capabilities of the firearm?
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:21:27 PM EDT
Every single one.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:21:57 PM EDT
Sounds like a TARP!!!
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:22:42 PM EDT
I wouldn't have to convert an assault rifle.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:22:55 PM EDT
Assault is a behavior not a device.


Assault is almost always done by people from the political left.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:22:56 PM EDT
You can shit in one hand and wish in the other, see wich one fills up faster.

But hypothetically, all of them.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:23:24 PM EDT
I might consider an SBR and some suppressors, but I have no use for a full auto. Even if I did, I couldn't afford the ammo.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:23:48 PM EDT
SKS wouldn't.

AK may or may not.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:24:03 PM EDT
Why not? Happy switch on every firearm I own sounds just fine to me.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:25:09 PM EDT
My MP5 clone for sure...
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:25:40 PM EDT
Nope
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:26:41 PM EDT

Originally Posted By operatorerror:
Every single one.

As quickly as I possibly could.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:26:57 PM EDT
Better to have and not need than to need and not have.

Happy switch, FTW.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:27:04 PM EDT
Originally Posted By thezentree:
I might consider an SBR and some suppressors, but I have no use for a full auto. Even if I did, I couldn't afford the ammo.


You really wouldn't if you could legally? I mean converting the guns if it was legal would cost next to nothing and having it doesn't mean you need to use it. I just can't see anyone turning down the capability.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:27:30 PM EDT
every one of them exept for the SP-1


Not messing with her
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:27:35 PM EDT
Originally Posted By garwj:
Nope


Why not?
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:27:36 PM EDT
I'd probably convert one of my ARs, and buy a 10-22 to convert.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:27:40 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/11/2010 9:28:29 PM EDT by Renegade13B]
A small percentage of my collection, strictly for defensive reasons. The rest would remain semi to save ammo and to save on firearm life.

Oh, and what is an assault rifle anyways?
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:28:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/11/2010 9:31:49 PM EDT by LA_357SIG]
If I am still buying my own ammo then screw full auto. OTOH every last one will have a suppressor though. Especially the Mosin.

ETA: didn't read the whole OP. I was thinking about a total NFA (Class III) repeal.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:28:37 PM EDT
Have, not need>need, not have.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:29:34 PM EDT
AK74, yes. M4gery, no.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:29:40 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Renegade13B:
A small percentage of my collection, strictly for defensive reasons. The rest would remain semi to save ammo and to save on firearm life.

Oh, and what is an assault rifle anyways?


Your saying if they were all full auto you couldn't control yourself?
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:30:17 PM EDT
I might do one just to have it but its not as much fun when you have to buy your own ammo...
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:30:38 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/11/2010 9:31:07 PM EDT by ziarifleman]

Originally Posted By Tolip:
I'd probably convert one of my ARs, and buy a 10-22 to convert.

Oh yeah. I would need me some .22s.

I wonder what a FN MAG/240B would cost on the civilian market.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:31:10 PM EDT
Meh... You'd have to get rid of the GCA of 1968 and the import ban of 89 to really get the effect you are looking for.


If the trifecta were repealed, I'd head down to Walmart and get a new MP5 and a couple of cases of 9mm. Why convert when you would be able to buy a whole machine gun at a fair price again?
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:31:28 PM EDT
[tinfoil]Maybe this is an ATF guy[/tinfoil]
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:32:41 PM EDT
I guess I'm wondering if the NFA and other laws against full auto never existed would we still have semi auto M4gery's and M-16A1 clones?
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:33:02 PM EDT
I don't own guns. It's for the children.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:33:34 PM EDT

Originally Posted By scottedward58:
I guess I'm wondering if the NFA and other laws against full auto never existed would we still have semi auto M4gery's and M-16A1 clones?

US small arms developments would be lightyears ahead of the rest of the world.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:34:13 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/11/2010 9:35:08 PM EDT by scottedward58]
Originally Posted By ziarifleman:

Originally Posted By Tolip:
I'd probably convert one of my ARs, and buy a 10-22 to convert.

Oh yeah. I would need me some .22s.

I wonder what a FN MAG/240B would cost on the civilian market.


about the same as a RR m16 does now if they sold for the same price the military gets them for IIRC
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:36:33 PM EDT
Originally Posted By scottedward58:
Originally Posted By garwj:
Nope


Why not?


Need training and discipline. Availability of full auto would subconsciously make me lose focus on shot placement thus making me like third world idiots. If I had training and experience under pressure then sure. But I don't.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:37:12 PM EDT
In a New York fucking minute.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:37:45 PM EDT
Originally Posted By MisterB:
Meh... You'd have to get rid of the GCA of 1968 and the import ban of 89 to really get the effect you are looking for.


If the trifecta were repealed, I'd head down to Walmart and get a new MP5 and a couple of cases of 9mm. Why convert when you would be able to buy a whole machine gun at a fair price again?


Because of the millions already owned now that are semi.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:38:09 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/11/2010 9:38:54 PM EDT by Seven-Shooter]

Originally Posted By ziarifleman:

Originally Posted By scottedward58:
I guess I'm wondering if the NFA and other laws against full auto never existed would we still have semi auto M4gery's and M-16A1 clones?

US small arms developments would be lightyears ahead of the rest of the world, yet again.

Fixed.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:39:03 PM EDT
ppffttttttttttshhh...

D'UH!!!

Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:39:17 PM EDT
Hell no.
I can barely afford to keep the Black Bullet Eater fed now.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:39:28 PM EDT
Since practically all full auto firearms have a semi- setting, I can't see why you wouldn't go FA with them all. It's not like you're losing semi-auto capability.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:41:04 PM EDT
Originally Posted By stickfigure:
Originally Posted By Renegade13B:
A small percentage of my collection, strictly for defensive reasons. The rest would remain semi to save ammo and to save on firearm life.

Oh, and what is an assault rifle anyways?


Your saying if they were all full auto you couldn't control yourself?


No, it is just an unneeded option. If I did convert a firearm, I would want to get my money out of the cost of the conversion, thus shooting on full auto. If I don't ever plan on using it for full auto, why would I ever convert it in the first place. The reason to not convert it is to save ammo and to save on lifespan.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:41:06 PM EDT
Uhh duh, shit man I'd convert a glock or two to full auto while I'm at it.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:41:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/11/2010 9:42:05 PM EDT by scottedward58]
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:41:53 PM EDT
Nah probably not but I would make it a point to buy my a belt fed ASAP
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:41:59 PM EDT
No.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:43:15 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/11/2010 9:51:34 PM EDT by GLOCKREAPER]

Originally Posted By timpryor:
shit man I'd convert a glock or two to full auto while I'm at it.

Select fire slide cover plates are cheap and 15 seconds to install and remove. No reason not to have one around without the NFA34 (or FOPA86.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K13xfC4EOfQ
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:45:01 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Renegade13B:
A small percentage of my collection, strictly for defensive reasons. The rest would remain semi to save ammo and to save on firearm life.

Oh, and what is an assault rifle anyways?


This.

As inexpensive as it might be to convert, it would add up quickly. Every auto loading rifle I bought after that would definitely have a giggle switch, though.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:45:36 PM EDT
If it was leagel I would, but only really use it w/ .22's or 7.62x39.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:46:37 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/11/2010 9:47:54 PM EDT by DLW223]




i would do it asap
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:55:32 PM EDT
only if ammo gets cheaper
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:57:13 PM EDT
As soon as possible.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 9:57:53 PM EDT
i dont have any assault rifles.
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 10:01:32 PM EDT
All my AR15 work just fine how they are.. I my buy a11.5 upper for a truck/HD carbine but 3 round burst/full auto is not something I want..
Link Posted: 9/11/2010 10:14:26 PM EDT
I would probably have one. On the other hand, I would SBR/SBS or supress ALL of them.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Top Top