Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 9/10/2010 10:45:02 PM EDT
Well?

What is revenge?
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 10:46:08 PM EDT
Who is the slack jawed faggot that voted no?
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 10:54:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/10/2010 10:55:47 PM EDT by victorgonzales]
how do we avenge it? other than living our lives proud to be american and if someone has a problem with it telling them to eat a fucking dick?


If we see a terrorist act happening we will kick their ass but oher than that what do we do?


I voted yes btw.. my vengence is by not giving a fuck what islam thinks or does but being ready to take out a jihadist once i recognize one.
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 10:56:03 PM EDT
Originally Posted By SaintMichaelArms:
Who is the slack jawed faggot that voted no?


You asked two different questions. No to have we avenged, yes to should we.
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 11:00:02 PM EDT
The war on islamic terrorists is far from over.
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 11:05:28 PM EDT
No we haven't and yes we should


it would have been avenged in any other country
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 11:08:08 PM EDT

Originally Posted By SaintMichaelArms:
Well?

What is revenge?

Revenge is something that has no place in war or national politics.

This is not about revenge, rage, or any other emotion. It is about a logical chain of events: There is a threat. We must destroy it, as efficiently and cleanly as possible - while retaining the moral high ground.

The proper question is, HAVE WE DESTROYED THE THREAT TO THIS COUNTRY YET?

I think everyone will agree the answer to that is NO.
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 11:12:34 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Dave_A:

Originally Posted By SaintMichaelArms:
Well?

What is revenge?

Revenge is something that has no place in war or national politics.

This is not about revenge, rage, or any other emotion. It is about a logical chain of events: There is a threat. We must destroy it, as efficiently and cleanly as possible - while retaining the moral high ground.

The proper question is, HAVE WE DESTROYED THE THREAT TO THIS COUNTRY YET?

I think everyone will agree the answer to that is NO.



I concur.

And I also concur that "DESTROYED" is what we need to do.

Link Posted: 9/10/2010 11:14:28 PM EDT
Not the last time I checked the news.
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 11:19:23 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Dave_A:

Originally Posted By SaintMichaelArms:
Well?

What is revenge?

Revenge is something that has no place in war or national politics.

This is not about revenge, rage, or any other emotion. It is about a logical chain of events: There is a threat. We must destroy it, as efficiently and cleanly as possible - while retaining the moral high ground.

The proper question is, HAVE WE DESTROYED THE THREAT TO THIS COUNTRY YET?

I think everyone will agree the answer to that is NO.


BS. Revenge is perhaps the oldest constant in international relations. I thought you took classes on this.

And, yes, we should take revenge.
Link Posted: 9/10/2010 11:39:35 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Dave_A:

Originally Posted By SaintMichaelArms:
Well?

What is revenge?

Revenge is something that has no place in war or national politics.

This is not about revenge, rage, or any other emotion. It is about a logical chain of events: There is a threat. We must destroy it, as efficiently and cleanly as possible - while retaining the moral high ground.

The proper question is, HAVE WE DESTROYED THE THREAT TO THIS COUNTRY YET?

I think everyone will agree the answer to that is NO.


QFT Couldn't have sad it any better.
Top Top