Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ah, just the right thing to do to a decent and fair minded writer about guns who is published in one of the premier, genuinely Tier 1 American publication
decent and fair minded?
and harpers isn't premier or tier anything
Take a bit of time out of your busy day, and go to a large book store, and find the wall or the shelves where they keep periodicals.
Take a look, and acquaint yourself with the number of different magazines.
You'll some are just pornography, some are about cars, about boats perhaps, certainly a great many on fitness, a few on guns, an awful lot for women, and and equally awful lot for men, several about women's fashion, several about men's, a few about travel, perhaps one or two about knives or aviation, several on cooking, several on losing weight, really, almost any topic you could think of.
Now, acquaint yourself with these magazines, and then, when you're done, take down a few of the better sort, the sort that the people who care about knowing and quality get at home, and purchase in airports when they travel. There are only a few in this august and rarefied company.
The preeminent one is, as it long has been, the New Yorker, it's peer is the Economist, a notch below those two are Harper's and the Atlantic. You could probably include the Council on Foreign Relations' journal to be up there as well, except for the relative narrowness of it's scope.
It's clear now that there are indeed tiers to the magazine world. Tier one, led by the New Yorker and the Economist at the paramount pinnacle, consists of those two, Harper's, the CFR, and the Atlantic.
Second tier would be the better interest-specific magazines, mainly Conde Nast's stuff, and of course Vogue. Rolling Stone might make the cut, and the National Geographic society, belongs perhaps indeed to the top tier, nevertheless reigns over the science magazines.
The third tear would be all the demographic minded gimmicky rubbish, don't you agree?