Quoted:
OK. for the sake of defining the two side clearly, and equally, what we have here is Whitey vs Blacky.
View Quote
Whitey reporting in, Jewey.
The NAACP verses the Cracker. Now that is a Barrel of laughs.
View Quote
I'm laffin all ready! HAHA
I don't understand it and yet, maybe I really do. You have to admit whether you like it or not that Whitey did take its turn at the lottery a while back. Remember the white guy that sued Hooters because they didn't let him become a waitress. Now, that was a HOOT(er_)!
View Quote
So a white guy sued a white owned restaraunt and you equate that with the never ending torrent of "I bin discrinamated ginst" litigation. How did that turn out? Did whites on the jury look favorably upon his case?
FYI: When trial attorneys bring these class-action suits they deliberately do so in large, urban settings where they know a large percentage of the jurors will be black or other minorities. Doesn't matter where the alleged offenses occured. They know where they have the best chance of getting a sympathetic jury.
You can't blame Blackey for picking its lawsuits that have a high potential to qualify for class action. So stop your bitching and put on your dresses.
View Quote
Still going on with the "Blackey" crap. Blacks are not "its" Mr. Levi.
I bitch to my worthless, socialist congressman to enact tort law reforms, but it doesn't do much good, as he receives boku$$ from the Trial Lawyers Ass.
I don't blame blacks for taking advantage of the system we have. In fact I encourage all minorities [b]to always claim that they are the victim of racism[/b]. There is no downside to doing so, and at best you might get something.
Eventually, it will lose it's meaning.