User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/16/2005 9:03:52 PM EDT
[#1]
Guess what....it doesn't suck. Actually, it's one of the most amazing movies I've seen in quite awhile.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 12:06:38 AM EDT
[#2]
didn't suck!
Funny thing, but one of my movie buff friends noted that the actor who played the cook on the ship also played the facial expression of Kong. Naomi Watts is hot, are all austrailian girls just like her and Nicole Kidman? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 4:02:37 AM EDT
[#3]
Andy Serkis, the same actor who was the basis for Gollum in LOTR |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2005 12:39:15 PM EDT
[#4]
I really enjoyed this movie.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/16/2006 10:46:04 AM EDT
[#5]
Bump, see first updated post.
I really liked the movie. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/16/2006 7:54:56 PM EDT
[#6]
It was excellent i was very impressed
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2006 3:23:08 AM EDT
[#7]
last week on Canuvo (Fox News) Canuvo had a good point. Why do people claim King Kong was a failure because it only grossed $400+ million while at the same time they claim Bareback Mountain was a success while it only grossed $25 million. They had a lezzie defending Bareback Mountain. Her case was weak and she got owned.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2006 4:12:13 AM EDT
[#8]
No it did not suck, But it would have been a better movie if about an Hour of it ended up on the cutting room floor!
I felt like I was watching some DVD extended version with a bunch of deleted scenes included! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2006 6:39:36 AM EDT
[#9]
I have not seen King Kong, but I like a nice LONG good movie. Obviously if the movie sucks longer is bad. However, when viewing a good movie, I like to get my money’s worth. I feel cheated if I watch a good flick and it’s only 90 friggin minutes.
Maybe some of you have ADD. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2006 8:48:53 AM EDT
[#10]
There may be something to that. Many of us can no longer sit through a movie that has "thinking" or "contemplation" moments. Then again, many people can no longer make it through reading an entire book. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2006 9:38:29 AM EDT
[#11]
I didn't care for it. 2 out of five bananas. It probably would have gotten three or three and a half it it had a better editor.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/19/2006 3:31:27 AM EDT
[#12]
You are correct, But sitting through long scenes of Dinosaurs chomping at people while swinging from hanging reeds & Giant slugs sucking people down hardly qualifies as a "thinking" or "contemplation" moment. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/19/2006 3:36:29 AM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2006 1:53:44 AM EDT
[#14]
Just watched it. I give it 10 bananas! it was great!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2006 6:46:57 AM EDT
[#15]
Giant slugs sucking people down?!!! I really need to see this movie! 
|
|||
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
