User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/15/2020 12:11:29 PM EDT
[#1]
I don't have the horsepower for VR, but I do have like 4 flight helmets now so I got that immersion going for me which is nice.
I really want VR because I feel like it's the only way to go with flight and racing sims, but DCS' current state makes it stupid to even try to get a hardware setup that will run it. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/15/2020 1:04:58 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: This sounds wierd, what exactly is happening with these units? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: The mainboard on mine reached the point where it won't be seen on my wife's computer but it still works on mine. I've read that you can get the board for about $60, it just hasn't hit the top of my to-do list. This sounds wierd, what exactly is happening with these units? Don't know. The thing works on my computer, but if I plug it into anything else it'll never show up as a joystick. After some research it's a known issue. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/15/2020 1:14:01 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Harlikwin]
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By lancecriminal86: I don't have the horsepower for VR, but I do have like 4 flight helmets now so I got that immersion going for me which is nice. I really want VR because I feel like it's the only way to go with flight and racing sims, but DCS' current state makes it stupid to even try to get a hardware setup that will run it. I mean VR works in DCS period. You do need to optimize it and have reasonable expectations. FWIW my 9700k system at 5ghz and 2080ti (non-OC) with reasonable settings routinely gets me 45-70+ fps in most reasonable situations. Which includes online play on crowded, heavy unit servers. And really the main issue tends to be that I'm CPU bound not GPU. So get the fastest single core CPU you can find/OC (10700k would be my suggestion since you only need 1-2 cores) Get a good air cooler or watercool it, and crank it up. Add a decent 3xxx series gfx card and you're good to go. The Reverb/Reverb G2 is the most demanding headset currently out there at 2160x2160 for GFX. If you go with a lower res RiftS or Index you'll be even better off frame rate wise, it just won't look as good, or you can easily kill yourself by super sampling on those lower end headsets. In terms of my upgrade path, I'm waiting on the intel 11x series as that finally should move to a smaller process, which hopefully means some serious speed gains. GFX wise, I was eyeing a 3090 since the 3080 is about equal to the 2080ti. But due to the absurd availability situation I'm probably gonna wait a bit longer to see if they pull a 3080ti out of their asses, though apparently the 3090 due to its huge VRAM does improve DCS some. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/15/2020 1:40:58 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: This sounds wierd, what exactly is happening with these units? One of the theories I've seen is that the boards are particularly vulnerable to power fluctuations, surges, or interruptions from hot-plugging. Mine was the only thing affected on a 7-port USB 3.0 hub after a power outage, so I kind of doubt it was a surge. Some have had luck resurrecting them by reducing the effective voltage available to it over USB (using an unpowered hub and a bunch of other stuff plugged in to it). |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/15/2020 1:53:36 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GilenusX207: One of the theories I've seen is that the boards are particularly vulnerable to power fluctuations, surges, or interruptions from hot-plugging. Mine was the only thing affected on a 7-port USB 3.0 hub after a power outage, so I kind of doubt it was a surge. Some have had luck resurrecting them by reducing the effective voltage available to it over USB (using an unpowered hub and a bunch of other stuff plugged in to it). Yeah that sounds weird... Glad mine is running rickety tick for now. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/15/2020 1:57:55 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Yeah that sounds weird... Glad mine is running rickety tick for now. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Originally Posted By GilenusX207: One of the theories I've seen is that the boards are particularly vulnerable to power fluctuations, surges, or interruptions from hot-plugging. Mine was the only thing affected on a 7-port USB 3.0 hub after a power outage, so I kind of doubt it was a surge. Some have had luck resurrecting them by reducing the effective voltage available to it over USB (using an unpowered hub and a bunch of other stuff plugged in to it). Yeah that sounds weird... Glad mine is running rickety tick for now. Mine ran with zero problems for years. I'd have never known it was misbehaving if I hadn't gotten my Virpil throttle and went to put the Warthog on my wife's machine. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/16/2020 10:59:33 AM EDT
[Last Edit: clayvt]
[#7]
I had the Warthog slew upgrade and one day it just up and stopped working. Contacted delta sim and he helped run me through some trouble shooting checking voltages. one of the pinouts from the warthog was showing low on one pin so he figured it was something in the slew and sent me a replacement. Same thing, not recognized. i managed to have my brother send me his OEM slew since he didn't throw his away like i did. It works just fine. the weirdest thing.
ETA: is anyone else playing around with the C-130 mod? its been a blast. I've been dropping troops and vehicles and taking over airfields left and right. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/16/2020 11:46:27 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By clayvt: I had the Warthog slew upgrade and one day it just up and stopped working. Contacted delta sim and he helped run me through some trouble shooting checking voltages. one of the pinouts from the warthog was showing low on one pin so he figured it was something in the slew and sent me a replacement. Same thing, not recognized. i managed to have my brother send me his OEM slew since he didn't throw his away like i did. It works just fine. the weirdest thing. ETA: is anyone else playing around with the C-130 mod? its been a blast. I've been dropping troops and vehicles and taking over airfields left and right. I have the controls mapped but haven't used it much. I think the latest update added a droppable MOAB. 
|
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 12/16/2020 2:01:23 PM EDT
[#9]
One more DCS player here. Learning the F16, A10, P51.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/16/2020 5:17:31 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CAJva: One more DCS player here. Learning the F16, A10, P51. Well, you picked a few good planes. Realize the viper is still very much a WIP... |
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 12/16/2020 7:09:10 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Well, you picked a few good planes. Realize the viper is still very much a WIP... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Originally Posted By CAJva: One more DCS player here. Learning the F16, A10, P51. Well, you picked a few good planes. Realize the viper is still very much a WIP... That’s what I tell myself every time i get shot down or “land” short of the runway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2020 12:11:11 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CAJva: That’s what I tell myself every time i get shot down or “land” short of the runway. If you have trouble flying/landing the Viper... LOL... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2020 12:49:02 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: If you have trouble flying/landing the Viper... LOL... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Originally Posted By CAJva: That’s what I tell myself every time i get shot down or “land” short of the runway. If you have trouble flying/landing the Viper... LOL... Do you ever have anything positive to say? JFC your shtick is getting old. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 12:00:59 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CAJva: That’s what I tell myself every time i get shot down or “land” short of the runway. When I first started I couldn't taxi for anything. I spent several hours just trying to get a hot airframe to the ramp. Now Aerial Refueling is easy day or night (navy style), and I can nail CASE III landings with a pitching deck. I've been part of several large organized PvP raids. It just takes time, it's really a study sim like MS flight sim. Practice and ask questions, if you want I'll hook you up with the group I fly with, we have instructors that can help. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 9:04:05 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RichieRich3902: When I first started I couldn't taxi for anything. I spent several hours just trying to get a hot airframe to the ramp. Now Aerial Refueling is easy day or night (navy style), and I can nail CASE III landings with a pitching deck. I've been part of several large organized PvP raids. It just takes time, it's really a study sim like MS flight sim. Practice and ask questions, if you want I'll hook you up with the group I fly with, we have instructors that can help. It is really easy to taxi way to fast in game. That rarely ends well. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 12:09:33 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SmilingBandit: It is really easy to taxi way to fast in game. That rarely ends well. Yup, usually thats a respawn moment  Depends on the airframe though. Some can taxi pretty fast. |
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 12:23:13 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RichieRich3902: When I first started I couldn't taxi for anything. I spent several hours just trying to get a hot airframe to the ramp. Now Aerial Refueling is easy day or night (navy style), and I can nail CASE III landings with a pitching deck. I've been part of several large organized PvP raids. It just takes time, it's really a study sim like MS flight sim. Practice and ask questions, if you want I'll hook you up with the group I fly with, we have instructors that can help. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RichieRich3902: Originally Posted By CAJva: That’s what I tell myself every time i get shot down or “land” short of the runway. When I first started I couldn't taxi for anything. I spent several hours just trying to get a hot airframe to the ramp. Now Aerial Refueling is easy day or night (navy style), and I can nail CASE III landings with a pitching deck. I've been part of several large organized PvP raids. It just takes time, it's really a study sim like MS flight sim. Practice and ask questions, if you want I'll hook you up with the group I fly with, we have instructors that can help. Thanks - just need to get enough stick time to learn all of the systems. I only roll the damn thing on taxi every once in awhile... I appreciated the A10s relatively complete assortment of training flights. Even more so when the F16s selection was, oh, thinner. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 12:29:23 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Yup, usually thats a respawn moment Depends on the airframe though. Some can taxi pretty fast. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: It is really easy to taxi way to fast in game. That rarely ends well. Yup, usually thats a respawn moment Depends on the airframe though. Some can taxi pretty fast. A-10 has some pretty wide legs. F-16's not so much.  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 12:30:04 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CAJva: Thanks - just need to get enough stick time to learn all of the systems. I only roll the damn thing on taxi every once in awhile... I appreciated the A10s relatively complete assortment of training flights. Even more so when the F16s selection was, oh, thinner. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CAJva: Originally Posted By RichieRich3902: Originally Posted By CAJva: That’s what I tell myself every time i get shot down or “land” short of the runway. When I first started I couldn't taxi for anything. I spent several hours just trying to get a hot airframe to the ramp. Now Aerial Refueling is easy day or night (navy style), and I can nail CASE III landings with a pitching deck. I've been part of several large organized PvP raids. It just takes time, it's really a study sim like MS flight sim. Practice and ask questions, if you want I'll hook you up with the group I fly with, we have instructors that can help. Thanks - just need to get enough stick time to learn all of the systems. I only roll the damn thing on taxi every once in awhile... I appreciated the A10s relatively complete assortment of training flights. Even more so when the F16s selection was, oh, thinner. The A-10 has been out forever so it's going to be the most complete. For the F-16 you gotta watch Wags' videos. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 1:58:24 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CAJva: Thanks - just need to get enough stick time to learn all of the systems. I only roll the damn thing on taxi every once in awhile... I appreciated the A10s relatively complete assortment of training flights. Even more so when the F16s selection was, oh, thinner. Yeah the F16 is still very much a WIP, so best not to use it as training material. Hornet is more done, but still a ways to go. Hog is more or less done so its not the worst place to start, not my favorite module since its so limited and slow. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 1:58:56 PM EDT
[#21]
Also...
Rotorhead hype train.... Sekrit DCS module is the AH-64D... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 2:00:12 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SmilingBandit: A-10 has some pretty wide legs. F-16's not so much. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/66085/download_jpg-1736816.JPG Lol. yeah no, not the viper... BTDT a few times like that though. Harrier is decently quick due to the outriggers, but you can still "bend" them. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 2:02:55 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Also... Rotorhead hype train.... Sekrit DCS module is the AH-64D... With the Kiowa that's going to be a fun pair. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 2:03:38 PM EDT
[#24]
those clouds !!!!!
and the Longbow, of course !  DCS WORLD | 2021 AND BEYOND |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 2:04:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: SmilingBandit]
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Shung: those clouds !!!!! and the Longbow, of course !  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA49DDZ13LAI've spent plenty of my life at six seconds in on that video.  Also I'll believe clouds when I see them. They've been on the "next year" plan for five years now. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 2:23:05 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SmilingBandit: I've spent plenty of my life at six seconds in on that video. Also I'll believe clouds when I see them. They've been on the "next year" plan for five years now. where is 6 seconds ? Guam ? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 3:05:22 PM EDT
[Last Edit: SmilingBandit]
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Shung: where is 6 seconds ? Guam ? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Shung: Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: I've spent plenty of my life at six seconds in on that video. Also I'll believe clouds when I see them. They've been on the "next year" plan for five years now. where is 6 seconds ? Guam ? Yup. The scores of individual parking spots down the center taxiway is a dead giveaway. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 3:07:15 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SmilingBandit: With the Kiowa that's going to be a fun pair. Yeah, I wish it woulda been the A which would have been a really good working pair. I think the eye of sauron MMR is gonna be stupidly OP in DCS world and you won't need the kiowa if you have it. Unless ED all of a sudden has a change of course and actually starts modeling "limitations" instead of just "capabilities" |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 3:08:23 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SmilingBandit: I've spent plenty of my life at six seconds in on that video. Also I'll believe clouds when I see them. They've been on the "next year" plan for five years now. IDK, those did look like in game shots, so I'm hopefully optimistic we might get clouds soon. I just hope they don't tank perfromance, do block IR missiles and sensors, and are actually synched for multiplayer. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 3:33:08 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: IDK, those did look like in game shots, so I'm hopefully optimistic we might get clouds soon. I just hope they don't tank perfromance, do block IR missiles and sensors, and are actually synched for multiplayer. multiplayer SYNC is MANDATORY |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 3:41:01 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Shung: multiplayer SYNC is MANDATORY Like I said, I'm hopeful. Looks like huey multicrew might be working "soon" too. So that should be cool finally. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 3:49:44 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Like I said, I'm hopeful. Looks like huey multicrew might be working "soon" too. So that should be cool finally. It sure would be. Especially with Polychop saying that they weren't going to try multiplayer for the Warrior until ED has the API working. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 3:57:31 PM EDT
[#33]
I like the latest updates to the F14 FM. Plane doesn't go berserk if I let my hands off the stick without an AP mode enabled.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 4:14:02 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Shung: multiplayer SYNC is MANDATORY Yep - otherwise it'll be clear skies in every MP server. Sync'd weather would be so rad. I never understood why this was hard. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 4:56:43 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Shung: those clouds !!!!! and the Longbow, of course ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA49DDZ13LASaw F-15E's around :32 secs in that vid |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 5:03:27 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By josepha1: Saw F-15E's around :32 secs in that vid F15E has been in the game forever as an AI... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 5:03:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Harlikwin]
[#37]
Well. Mostly good/interesting news, from KP
 And double thank christ on point #6. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 5:11:20 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2alpha-down0]
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Well. Mostly good/interesting news, from KP https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/287928410687406080/789595442198478878/unknown.png And double thank christ on point #6. Good news on the cloud sync, and yes, centralizing weapons development is a good idea. Once they leave the plane, they're "owned" by the core system anyway, IIRC. I'm also glad to hear "no WWI" from them. Good; the last thing ED needs is another era to develop for. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 5:22:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Harlikwin]
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GilenusX207: Good news on the cloud sync, and yes, centralizing weapons development is a good idea. Once they leave the plane, they're "owned" by the core system anyway, IIRC. I'm also glad to hear "no WWI" from them. Good; the last thing ED needs is another era to develop for. Yeah, mostly good news, plus they seem to be getting a bit better on expectations managment as in what they realistically think they can do vs what they can actually do. Some bummer points in there too about the F4 and Tornado. Though TBH it would be KILLER if HB did the F4... Jester is basically built to do it. F4's operated off Forestal carriers... IDK call me crazy. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 6:40:11 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Yeah, mostly good news, plus they seem to be getting a bit better on expectations managment as in what they realistically think they can do vs what they can actually do. Some bummer points in there too about the F4 and Tornado. Though TBH it would be KILLER if HB did the F4... Jester is basically built to do it. F4's operated off Forestal carriers... IDK call me crazy. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Originally Posted By GilenusX207: Good news on the cloud sync, and yes, centralizing weapons development is a good idea. Once they leave the plane, they're "owned" by the core system anyway, IIRC. I'm also glad to hear "no WWI" from them. Good; the last thing ED needs is another era to develop for. Yeah, mostly good news, plus they seem to be getting a bit better on expectations managment as in what they realistically think they can do vs what they can actually do. Some bummer points in there too about the F4 and Tornado. Though TBH it would be KILLER if HB did the F4... Jester is basically built to do it. F4's operated off Forestal carriers... IDK call me crazy. While it means that ED will have work to do, I'm a little shocked that some parts like the weapons aren't centrally managed. I'm really shocked that let it continue after the RN-24. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 6:57:39 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2alpha-down0]
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SmilingBandit: While it means that ED will have work to do, I'm a little shocked that some parts like the weapons aren't centrally managed. I'm really shocked that let it continue after the RN-24. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SmilingBandit: Originally Posted By Harlikwin: Originally Posted By GilenusX207: Good news on the cloud sync, and yes, centralizing weapons development is a good idea. Once they leave the plane, they're "owned" by the core system anyway, IIRC. I'm also glad to hear "no WWI" from them. Good; the last thing ED needs is another era to develop for. Yeah, mostly good news, plus they seem to be getting a bit better on expectations managment as in what they realistically think they can do vs what they can actually do. Some bummer points in there too about the F4 and Tornado. Though TBH it would be KILLER if HB did the F4... Jester is basically built to do it. F4's operated off Forestal carriers... IDK call me crazy. While it means that ED will have work to do, I'm a little shocked that some parts like the weapons aren't centrally managed. I'm really shocked that let it continue after the RN-24. When you think about it, it really is a lot of work. Not only developing new weapons for 3rd parties to make money on (Meteor, AIM-9D and J for the F-8), but maintaining what those devs have already coded (HB and the Phoenix, SD-10, Viggen ASMs, etc). No wonder they left it alone for so long. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 7:16:36 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: F15E has been in the game forever as an AI... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Originally Posted By josepha1: Saw F-15E's around :32 secs in that vid F15E has been in the game forever as an AI... I'm not a smart man (forrest gump voice).
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 7:32:55 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Harlikwin]
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By josepha1: I'm not a smart man (forrest gump voice). The larger joke being is that Razbam has been caught teasing F15E images using ED's old external model... But they are using the FC3 mig29 to tease the upcoming mig29... So... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 7:38:28 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Harlikwin]
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GilenusX207: When you think about it, it really is a lot of work. Not only developing new weapons for 3rd parties to make money on (Meteor, AIM-9D and J for the F-8), but maintaining what those devs have already coded (HB and the Phoenix, SD-10, Viggen ASMs, etc). No wonder they left it alone for so long. I absolutely don't disagree, but at the end of the day what most of the A/A weapons need is a context, and to be vaguely relative in that context (cuz sekrits). There is enough stuff out there for most of the "old" stuff to do it right, (which might make one side or the other cry). And in terms of the "new stuff" enough rough data to make those "balanced" I.e. put the performance of ALL weps in the overlap zones of "known" data. I mean I really want to actually a "sidewinder" missile path in DCS  Yeah it was called that due to how it tracked in weird side-to-side pattern. Frankly I think most of the weapons modeling in DCS is pretty poor, especially things like ground weapons i.e. CBU's or GP bomb blast damage, and it really hurts the core game, because then ED makes other shit waay too precise so you can get kills with those weapons. I mean CEP is known thing for alot of those systems and ED models it at like 1/10th of that or worse. But it is a big job, though the main rework should be AI units/behavior with the "Slavbo" gunners and the ground AI being functionally retarded. I mean no tank commander is gonna set up in some field and wait for the inevitable helo/A10 to come along. Oh shit trees! 200m over there? Yeah, bro, lets setup there instead of the middle of this open field... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 7:39:00 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SmilingBandit: While it means that ED will have work to do, I'm a little shocked that some parts like the weapons aren't centrally managed. I'm really shocked that let it continue after the RN-24. I'm shocked we don't have mushroom clouds years later 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 8:25:12 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2alpha-down0]
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: Frankly I think most of the weapons modeling in DCS is pretty poor, especially things like ground weapons i.e. CBU's or GP bomb blast damage, and it really hurts the core game, because then ED makes other shit waay too precise so you can get kills with those weapons. I mean CEP is known thing for alot of those systems and ED models it at like 1/10th of that or worse. An overhaul of ground vehicle damage modeling and splash damage would make me a very happy Cold War bomb truck driver. Oh, and napalm... I think we're still supposed to get Mk77s for the Hornet so there is some hope. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 9:11:34 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GilenusX207: An overhaul of ground vehicle damage modeling and splash damage would make me a very happy Cold War bomb truck driver. Oh, and napalm... I think we're still supposed to get Mk77s for the Hornet so there is some hope. I mean at some point they have to do it, this "pickle barrel" BS will get worn out at some point. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 9:24:09 PM EDT
[Last Edit: freerider04]
[#48]
How's that new 57mm AAA thing?
Old school soviet AAA including the big stuff (85 and 100mm) have been on my wishlist for a while ETA:maybe one day my dream of DCS:Thud will come true |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 9:32:02 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Harlikwin]
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By freerider04: How's that new 57mm AAA thing? Old school soviet AAA including the big stuff (85 and 100mm) have been on my wishlist for a while ETA:maybe one day my dream of DCS:Thud will come true it looks good, but I havent tested it yet. Surprisingly the ww2 40mm bofors works pretty good against most jets. As to the Thud, there is one dev considering doing it (i.e. have the docs), you might not be that excited if I told you which one. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2020 9:35:24 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: it looks good, but I havent tested it yet. Surprisingly the ww2 40mm bofors works pretty good against most jets. As to the Thud, there is one dev considering doing it (i.e. have the docs), you might not be that excited if I told you which one. Does it rhyme with spazbam? |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
